by retro_royal » 13 Oct 2008 15:17
by chandog » 13 Oct 2008 15:19
retro_royal A source close to the club has told me that we are interested in taking QPR's unsettled goalkeeper Lee Camp on loan from the london club with a view of making it perminant in Jan. Certainly some interesting competition for Marcus?
by retro_royal » 13 Oct 2008 15:24
by Alan Partridge » 13 Oct 2008 15:27
by retro_royal » 13 Oct 2008 15:38
by skipper » 13 Oct 2008 16:11
by retro_royal » 13 Oct 2008 16:11
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 13 Oct 2008 16:45
by Deathy » 13 Oct 2008 18:50
retro_royal Camp is > Fed
by winchester_royal » 13 Oct 2008 19:17
retro_royal Camp is > Fed
by retro_royal » 14 Oct 2008 09:10
by winchester_royal » 14 Oct 2008 14:02
retro_royal Ok then Camp is proven ... which means he is better than Fed.
by retro_royal » 14 Oct 2008 14:19
by winchester_royal » 14 Oct 2008 14:22
retro_royal Better than Fed at this time then because he is more proven?
by retro_royal » 14 Oct 2008 15:12
by winchester_royal » 14 Oct 2008 15:17
retro_royal W_R I disagree slightly because i'd maybe want experienced talent over just talent in a position like goal , after all you don't win anything with kids.
by juanpablo » 14 Oct 2008 15:25
by winchester_royal » 14 Oct 2008 15:26
juanpablo A Fed will never be no1
by juanpablo » 14 Oct 2008 15:29
winchester_royaljuanpablo A Fed will never be no1
I bow to your superior knowledge of the future.
by winchester_royal » 14 Oct 2008 15:30
juanpablowinchester_royaljuanpablo A Fed will never be no1
I bow to your superior knowledge of the future.
thanks... id wager a lot of money on it....
various reasons
1. Fed isnt very good
2. Hammer is better than him
I predict USA completes this final season. If we go up we will buy a new experienced keeper, Hammer moves up to no2. A Fed settles for 3 or more than likely moves on
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests