by UpNorth » 28 Jun 2009 09:06
by rg6royal » 28 Jun 2009 11:38
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Jun 2009 11:58
by bobbybottler » 28 Jun 2009 22:25
by premiership_bound » 28 Jun 2009 23:20
by Franchise FC » 29 Jun 2009 08:01
premiership_bound and shag six formers IIRC
by RFCMod » 29 Jun 2009 09:05
Franchise FCpremiership_bound and shag six formers IIRC
I have no idea guy is, but I'd be EXTREMELY careful with remarkes like that. Libel is VERY expensive.
by Row Z Royal » 29 Jun 2009 10:31
Franchise FCpremiership_bound and shag six formers IIRC
I have no idea guy is, but I'd be EXTREMELY careful with remarkes like that. Libel is VERY expensive.
Franchise FCpremiership_bound and shag six formers IIRC
I have no idea guy is, but I'd be EXTREMELY careful with remarkes like that. Libel is VERY expensive.
by Franchise FC » 29 Jun 2009 14:33
Row Z RoyalFranchise FCpremiership_bound and shag six formers IIRC
I have no idea guy is, but I'd be EXTREMELY careful with remarkes like that. Libel is VERY expensive.
'IIRC' is the get-out clause as he may suddenly realise that he hadn't recalled correctly at all.
ORFranchise FCpremiership_bound and shag six formers IIRC
I have no idea guy is, but I'd be EXTREMELY careful with remarkes like that. Libel is VERY expensive.
Hello, Mr Woods.
by West Stand Man » 29 Jun 2009 16:28
Franchise FC
I think you'll find that IIRC would not suffice - and no, not Mr Woods
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998, From Despair To Where?, linkenholtroyal, RG30 and 116 guests