by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 11:09
by Barry the bird boggler » 20 Aug 2009 11:11
by West Stand Man » 20 Aug 2009 11:18
by Isaac Hunt » 20 Aug 2009 11:19
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 11:27
by Wycombe Royal » 20 Aug 2009 11:30
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 11:32
Wycombe Royal I doubt Bristol City will be willing to let him go out on loan just to be backup at another club.
by Isaac Hunt » 20 Aug 2009 11:32
YateleyRoyal has been very consistent for Bristol City
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 11:39
Isaac HuntYateleyRoyal has been very consistent for Bristol City
by Deathy » 20 Aug 2009 11:43
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 11:45
Deathy He was getting rave reviews last season. Have they since bought a new better keeper? Seems a strange turn around to now let him go out on loan.
by Isaac Hunt » 20 Aug 2009 11:45
YateleyRoyalIsaac HuntYateleyRoyal has been very consistent for Bristol City
Whats wrong with that?
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 11:53
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 20 Aug 2009 11:54
Isaac Hunt
Just wondering why they'd allow him to go out on loan?
by Plymouth_Royal » 20 Aug 2009 12:34
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 12:42
Plymouth_Royal Why would we need another keeper when he have federici, Hamer (played 65 LEAGUE games), McCarthy (doing well at yeovil) and anderson?
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 14:37
by Plymouth_Royal » 20 Aug 2009 16:17
YateleyRoyalPlymouth_Royal Why would we need another keeper when he have federici, Hamer (played 65 LEAGUE games), McCarthy (doing well at yeovil) and anderson?
Because Hamer has played consistently at a lower level, McCarthy and Andersen are unproven, and I think Fed needs some genuine competition
by YateleyRoyal » 20 Aug 2009 16:37
Plymouth_RoyalYateleyRoyalPlymouth_Royal Why would we need another keeper when he have federici, Hamer (played 65 LEAGUE games), McCarthy (doing well at yeovil) and anderson?
Because Hamer has played consistently at a lower level, McCarthy and Andersen are unproven, and I think Fed needs some genuine competition
Then if these keepers weren't genuine competition then why did hamer sign a new deal with club and same for anderson, but last season. To suggest we sign another keeper when Hamer has been given a new contract and been told he will be challenging for number 1, is quite daft. Plus, McCarthy signed a new deal on the 16th so the club clearly rate this kid. Suggesting a keeper when we're well covered for the present and future is a waste IMO.
But, Basso is a good keeper and would do well in this league.
by Plymouth_Royal » 20 Aug 2009 17:54
YateleyRoyalPlymouth_RoyalYateleyRoyal
Because Hamer has played consistently at a lower level, McCarthy and Andersen are unproven, and I think Fed needs some genuine competition
Then if these keepers weren't genuine competition then why did hamer sign a new deal with club and same for anderson, but last season. To suggest we sign another keeper when Hamer has been given a new contract and been told he will be challenging for number 1, is quite daft. Plus, McCarthy signed a new deal on the 16th so the club clearly rate this kid. Suggesting a keeper when we're well covered for the present and future is a waste IMO.
But, Basso is a good keeper and would do well in this league.
By would do well, do you mean has done well?
Also, by that logic, would you turn down signing Steven Taylor from Newcastle if he was available just because Pearce and Ingi are captains and we just signed Mills? Even though we have good players, surely bringing in better, proven players can only help
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 127 guests