What would be more laughable?

Which teams would have been mugged off worst?

Federici to Liverpool - 2million
8
11%
Hughes to Norwich - 500K
11
15%
Sonko to Stoke - 2million
14
20%
Halford to Sunderland - 2.5million
13
18%
Kitson to Stoke - 5.5million
24
34%
Shorey to Villa - 3.5million.
1
1%
 
Total votes: 71
rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

What would be more laughable?

by rhroyal » 14 Jan 2010 10:41

The rumour is that Liverpool will make a 2million bid for Fedders. For me it will be up there with the biggest muggings ever. Hughes going to Norwich for 500k is currently at the top, but this transfer will challenge that if it goes through.
Last edited by rhroyal on 14 Jan 2010 11:15, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6685
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Wycombe Royal » 14 Jan 2010 10:49

Haven't you got the Sonko and Halford fees round the wrong way?

rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

Re: What would be more laughable?

by rhroyal » 14 Jan 2010 10:50

Don't think so. We bought Halford for 2million, sold him for 2.5. I might be wrong with Sonko though. The reason I didn't vote for Halford is that we got mugged the same way 6 months earlier.

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16921
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: What would be more laughable?

by TBM » 14 Jan 2010 10:51

Halford cost Sunderland £3.5m after we had bought him for £2.25m 6 months previous...........

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Platypuss » 14 Jan 2010 10:58

TBM Halford cost Sunderland £3.5m after we had bought him for £2.25m 6 months previous...........


Soccerbase says No.

http://www.soccerbase.com/players_details.sd?playerid=33472


User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16921
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: What would be more laughable?

by TBM » 14 Jan 2010 11:00

Platypuss
TBM Halford cost Sunderland £3.5m after we had bought him for £2.25m 6 months previous...........


Soccerbase says No.

http://www.soccerbase.com/players_details.sd?playerid=33472


Wiki says yes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Halford

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Platypuss » 14 Jan 2010 11:02


User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6685
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Wycombe Royal » 14 Jan 2010 11:02

rhroyal Don't think so. We bought Halford for 2million, sold him for 2.5. I might be wrong with Sonko though. The reason I didn't vote for Halford is that we got mugged the same way 6 months earlier.

Well there is no way we got £3.5m for Sonko.

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16921
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: What would be more laughable?

by TBM » 14 Jan 2010 11:05



So Soccerbase and Wiki are both wrong....

Did we get £3m for him? - how many appearances would it have been for?

Sonko was only £2m btw
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 587931.stm


User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Platypuss » 14 Jan 2010 11:09

Reckon that once you strip out add-ons etc that we broke even on Halford.

rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

Re: What would be more laughable?

by rhroyal » 14 Jan 2010 11:15

Sonko corrected.

W&E Royal
Member
Posts: 452
Joined: 29 Mar 2008 21:06

Re: What would be more laughable?

by W&E Royal » 14 Jan 2010 11:21

I don't think Shorey to Villa was that laughable, was an England International and is a very good left back but as Sidders is finding out, it is tough at the top.

6 months prior to Kitsons move he was on the verge on an England call up as he was the Premier Leagues highest English scorer, I think £5.5 million was a good price. I can't think why you would put both these in the same context as Hughes and Halford.

User avatar
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2851
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:46

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 14 Jan 2010 11:36

Wouldn't say Shorey was laughable, nor Hughes at £500k.

Sonko because he had been so bad that season.

Kits tops it though, there is no way in a million years he was ever going to fit into Stoke's system. Pulis made the mistake of looking at how tall his and thinking he's a target man, which we all know he aint....


CMRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2011
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 19:18

Re: What would be more laughable?

by CMRoyal » 14 Jan 2010 11:47

Kits wins this one - already 29, and previously never better than sporadically good for us in the Prem.

Fed's a very good keeper, and young too. So £2million might well be a bargain in the long run.

pearcetom
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 22:13

Re: What would be more laughable?

by pearcetom » 14 Jan 2010 15:07

as much as i love kits, 5.5mil is a bit steep!

Forty
Member
Posts: 159
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 09:35

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Forty » 15 Jan 2010 11:06

You've missed the biggest mugging, surely.


Sean Evers - £0.5 Million - years ago. How on earth.

User avatar
skipper
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1447
Joined: 25 Nov 2005 17:54
Location: Trowbridge

Re: What would be more laughable?

by skipper » 15 Jan 2010 14:56

Sonko probably from that list - Don't think Andy Hughes should even be in that list at all - Do the Norwich fans feel hard done by? At 500k?

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Thaumagurist* » 15 Jan 2010 14:58

250K for Keith Scott was an outrage.

User avatar
rg6royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3734
Joined: 17 Aug 2006 22:38
Location: Lowers

Re: What would be more laughable?

by rg6royal » 15 Jan 2010 16:46

I voted on the Halford deal. However I missed out the Kitson one, and would probably say that one in hindsight.

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: What would be more laughable?

by Arch » 15 Jan 2010 19:16

Hughes has plugged away and done a decent job for Norwich and Leeds. Surely worth 500k over the years. Even Halford had some impact at Sheff U (but still a massive LOL @ Sunderland and Roy Keane). Sonko has been an utter bust.

If Fed were to go to Liverpool, there's a serious chance he'd never play another significant football match in his life.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests

It is currently 03 Sep 2025 19:56