by Ouroboros »
12 Nov 2014 14:51
No, JMW.
I've been pretty clear that the studies aren't about football and don't prove discrimination in football exists.
I originally posted the links in answer to Floyd's position that subconscious racial discrimination isn't a real phenomenon.
As we know that it is, my point is that actually you're a fool to look at the situation of black english managers and say "until I have evidence specific cases of discrimination in this environment then I won't believe it exists." With what we know very surely about human nature we should be comfortable with the working assumption that as a young aspiring english manager, being black disadvantages your job prospects.
And you might have missed that the study uses African and Asian names. Clearly employing a Frenchman and employing a black englishman are different things, and I don't understand why the success of largely white europeans in big managerial roles should be of any solace to black english managers.
Surely the link isn't too hard to grasp here? I realise that black english managers largely have english names. But when one study shows that names suggesting African heritage confer a professional disadvantage, is it an outlandish leap to suggest that black skin might do the same?
Do you suppose that if I spend more than 5 seconds googling "racial discrimination" I'd not be able to find a study specifically about discrimination based on skin colour?