It's about the game and if it's a game that cannot be officiated properly you have no game. No arguments if they left the pitch at 40 mins. The big issue is the "fake" game for last five minutes knowing the decision was already made and no checking 15 mins later.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Yeah but the game is about the supporters....not the players
Thousands of folk unnecessarily out of pocket
yes..the game could've been called off later....had it been necessary.....it wasn'tSutekh wrote:Understandable decision really. The linesmen were having dfficulty seeing the far side of the pitch and Fulham's kit wasn't helping that (apparently). It should have been called off at about 30 minutes when it was getting really bad but they decided to carry on for some obscure reason.
If the game had restarted the fog could well have come back worse (it had been lifting and returning throughout) and the game called off later. It was obvious that the officials were having problems looking across the pitch so offsides and incidents on the far side may well have been difficult for them to identify confidently - and imagine the stick they'd have got if one team won the game through a poor offside decision missed/given because of the weather.
As to the game, Harriott is not a wing back. Reading looked to be struggling but had the best two chancesFredericks is ******* quick and there is also a rumour that Reading actually played "spotlight" keepers tonight as I couldn't see a keeper at our end of the pitch.
Reminds me of that story of the Reading keeper being left alone on the pitch at Tranmere(?) about 80 years ago when the ref abandoned the game due to thick fog but but no-one got the message to him and he was left waiting for the next appear to appear out of the gloom....
When did you take that picture then? Cant have been tonight unless there was a rugby match on ...genome wrote:The scene at the Mad Stad. I can't see a fcuking thing.
I heard this from RG7jr today but his story wasn't a Reading game, it was a Chelsea game (I think 1936 was mentioned, which would fit time line wise). Maybe its just one of those old folklore stories that has been twisted for all clubs. A bit like the wedding speech where the best man gets the bride and groom to play Mr and Mrs and there are some strange answers. You can look that up but I have had 2 people tell me that they have witnessed this at a wedding.Sutekh wrote: Reminds me of that story of the Reading keeper being left alone on the pitch at Tranmere(?) about 80 years ago when the ref abandoned the game due to thick fog but but no-one got the message to him and he was left waiting for the next appear to appear out of the gloom....
Yeah, this really, and the comment about Fulham's kit was correct too, they were even harder to spot.Winston Smith wrote:A whole lot of wise-after-the-event type folk on here tonight.
I couldn't see the other side of the penalty area from my seat in the East. Was surprised it made it to HT tbh.
RG7Fan wrote:When did you take that picture then? Cant have been tonight unless there was a rugby match on ...genome wrote:The scene at the Mad Stad. I can't see a fcuking thing.
I agree it should have been canned at the 30 min mark (or thereabouts), very confused by the decision just at the start of 2nd half (especially as it had lifted quite a lot). To be honest I think it might be a blessing in disguise - I couldn't see us winning that. Yeah we had 2 very good chances, but a lot of the time I felt we were pressured and looked like conceding. Still, it was better than a few weeks back.
What's the replay ticket position? I assume season tickets are covered, but I heard on BBRC that its 1/2 price due to a FL rule. I wasn't sure if that was a "you must charge at least 1/2 price" or "you can charge no more than 1/2 price". Personally I think it should be free for the people who bought tickets for today.
If anyone else wants to pitch up at the replay then they can pay. Given that ticket money accounts for not very much I'm sure the club could do that, and if the league want their cut then we should pay them anyway. It would garner far more good feeling and loyalty from the fans, who might just buy a few more beers and pies because of it.
Love the way the BBC is showing it as abandoned after 50 minutes - did I miss 5 minutes of the second half after we all buggered off?
Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:Should have been cancelled in the afternoon. Like Brighton was
Yes it does, but on the flip side Callum Harriott is now injured with nothing to show for it.marlowuk wrote: Still - it gives us more time to get Swift and McShane and Obita (and Rakells?) back to full fitness before meeting them again. Fulham are a good side - better than their league position suggests - and we will need to be at the top of our game to beat them.
He was warming down - HTH.marlowuk wrote:
And, if the decision had been made immediately after the first half, why was Paul McShane warming up on the pitch during the half-time break?
The injury gets overturned when the game is abandoned.Royal Ginger wrote:Yes it does, but on the flip side Callum Harriott is now injured with nothing to show for it.marlowuk wrote: Still - it gives us more time to get Swift and McShane and Obita (and Rakells?) back to full fitness before meeting them again. Fulham are a good side - better than their league position suggests - and we will need to be at the top of our game to beat them.
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 596 guests