by Winston Biscuit » 26 Aug 2019 17:24
26 Aug 2019 17:24The Brexit voters?Winston Biscuit wrote:Had a look at the Bolton forum. They seem to think this will all get sorted late on.
Recent history suggests that it will - the EFL are apparently getting pressure from other League 1 clubs to get this done one way or another as you currently have 4 teams with results that will be wiped, a potential fixture pile-up due to the Bury games being suspended and various other issues regarding if clubs will have 21, 22 or 23 home games this season.Winston Biscuit wrote:Had a look at the Bolton forum. They seem to think this will all get sorted late on.
by Winston Biscuit » 27 Aug 2019 09:17
27 Aug 2019 09:17I don't know how you would do it but they should look to stagger things over 2 seasons I recksStranded wrote:Recent history suggests that it will - the EFL are apparently getting pressure from other League 1 clubs to get this done one way or another as you currently have 4 teams with results that will be wiped, a potential fixture pile-up due to the Bury games being suspended and various other issues regarding if clubs will have 21, 22 or 23 home games this season.Winston Biscuit wrote:Had a look at the Bolton forum. They seem to think this will all get sorted late on.
If both do go under then we will end up in a farcical situation where:
*L1 will be 22 teams - teams will have 4 blank weekends and 2 clubs will finish earlier than everyone else.
* Only 2 teams will be relegated
*L2 will see 5 teams automatically promoted and the play-offs will be contested by the teams in 6th to 9th
* Nobody will be relegated
As a result, L2 will be a lot more competitive as far as promotion push is concerned as likely teams as low as 16th or 17th will fancy a late run but conversely for the bottom 6 or 7 teams the season will be a dead rubber from Feb/March - this could affect gates etc and clubs finances.
by Winston Biscuit » 27 Aug 2019 11:47
27 Aug 2019 11:47.his daughter is an absolute oxf*rdWinston Biscuit wrote:Some fella on the wireless just said Bolton's 'fallen through' deal is seen as just each side negotiating hard and it should go through today, though obv could still hit problems. Bury have had an offer (from Alastair Campbell's son) but it only happened over the weekend it is very much in the balance as there is so little time to actually sort it out before the deadline.
L2 would still only promote 4 teams it’s the national conference that would have the extra promotion placesStranded wrote:Recent history suggests that it will - the EFL are apparently getting pressure from other League 1 clubs to get this done one way or another as you currently have 4 teams with results that will be wiped, a potential fixture pile-up due to the Bury games being suspended and various other issues regarding if clubs will have 21, 22 or 23 home games this season.Winston Biscuit wrote:Had a look at the Bolton forum. They seem to think this will all get sorted late on.
If both do go under then we will end up in a farcical situation where:
*L1 will be 22 teams - teams will have 4 blank weekends and 2 clubs will finish earlier than everyone else.
* Only 2 teams will be relegated
*L2 will see 5 teams automatically promoted and the play-offs will be contested by the teams in 6th to 9th
* Nobody will be relegated
As a result, L2 will be a lot more competitive as far as promotion push is concerned as likely teams as low as 16th or 17th will fancy a late run but conversely for the bottom 6 or 7 teams the season will be a dead rubber from Feb/March - this could affect gates etc and clubs finances.
by The Enfield Royal71 » 27 Aug 2019 13:46
27 Aug 2019 13:46I read and posted last week only 1 team will go down from L2 and 1 up from NL. I would rather 3 (Woking, Solihull and Maidenhead) go up.Sutekh wrote:L2 would still only promote 4 teams it’s the national conference that would have the extra promotion placesStranded wrote:Recent history suggests that it will - the EFL are apparently getting pressure from other League 1 clubs to get this done one way or another as you currently have 4 teams with results that will be wiped, a potential fixture pile-up due to the Bury games being suspended and various other issues regarding if clubs will have 21, 22 or 23 home games this season.Winston Biscuit wrote:Had a look at the Bolton forum. They seem to think this will all get sorted late on.
If both do go under then we will end up in a farcical situation where:
*L1 will be 22 teams - teams will have 4 blank weekends and 2 clubs will finish earlier than everyone else.
* Only 2 teams will be relegated
*L2 will see 5 teams automatically promoted and the play-offs will be contested by the teams in 6th to 9th
* Nobody will be relegated
As a result, L2 will be a lot more competitive as far as promotion push is concerned as likely teams as low as 16th or 17th will fancy a late run but conversely for the bottom 6 or 7 teams the season will be a dead rubber from Feb/March - this could affect gates etc and clubs finances.
Well my maths is completely screwed anyway - as I'm making L1 a 26 team league.Sutekh wrote:L2 would still only promote 4 teams it’s the national conference that would have the extra promotion placesStranded wrote:Recent history suggests that it will - the EFL are apparently getting pressure from other League 1 clubs to get this done one way or another as you currently have 4 teams with results that will be wiped, a potential fixture pile-up due to the Bury games being suspended and various other issues regarding if clubs will have 21, 22 or 23 home games this season.Winston Biscuit wrote:Had a look at the Bolton forum. They seem to think this will all get sorted late on.
If both do go under then we will end up in a farcical situation where:
*L1 will be 22 teams - teams will have 4 blank weekends and 2 clubs will finish earlier than everyone else.
* Only 2 teams will be relegated
*L2 will see 5 teams automatically promoted and the play-offs will be contested by the teams in 6th to 9th
* Nobody will be relegated
As a result, L2 will be a lot more competitive as far as promotion push is concerned as likely teams as low as 16th or 17th will fancy a late run but conversely for the bottom 6 or 7 teams the season will be a dead rubber from Feb/March - this could affect gates etc and clubs finances.
So sad and life changing for so many fans.Stranded wrote:Bury takeover has collapsed as proposed new owners are unwilling to take on the risks following their review of the finances, CVA and ground.
Looks like they will be gone this evening barring a late miracle.
Even with a phoenix club they will have to wait until the 2020/21 season to see "Bury" kick a ball again. Feasibly they could play at the ground but depends on if it is sold - would imagine there will be planning permission for houses/retail going in pretty quickly if they do go pop today.StellaPlease wrote:So sad and life changing for so many fans.Stranded wrote:Bury takeover has collapsed as proposed new owners are unwilling to take on the risks following their review of the finances, CVA and ground.
Looks like they will be gone this evening barring a late miracle.
They'll create a phoenix club, but unlike Aldershot they won't be able to play at the ground.
Horrible stuff.
by Winston Biscuit » 27 Aug 2019 16:10
27 Aug 2019 16:10AFC Wimbledon?Winston Biscuit wrote:Cant help but think Bury's low attendances, and proximity to other big clubs, may well not help a Phoenix club progress too far
Yeah. They'll have the season to plan but no football for a year hurts.Stranded wrote:Even with a phoenix club they will have to wait until the 2020/21 season to see "Bury" kick a ball again. Feasibly they could play at the ground but depends on if it is sold - would imagine there will be planning permission for houses/retail going in pretty quickly if they do go pop today.StellaPlease wrote:So sad and life changing for so many fans.Stranded wrote:Bury takeover has collapsed as proposed new owners are unwilling to take on the risks following their review of the finances, CVA and ground.
Looks like they will be gone this evening barring a late miracle.
They'll create a phoenix club, but unlike Aldershot they won't be able to play at the ground.
Horrible stuff.
by Winston Biscuit » 27 Aug 2019 16:14
27 Aug 2019 16:143 years before AFC Wimbledon was formed, the old Wimbledon averaged 18,000 at home games.Hendo wrote:AFC Wimbledon?Winston Biscuit wrote:Cant help but think Bury's low attendances, and proximity to other big clubs, may well not help a Phoenix club progress too far
I seem to remember them ending with really low attendances and there are numerous other clubs close to Wimbledon.
Did they? I seem to remember a game with us at Selhurst Park and the away fans outnumbered the home fans.Winston Biscuit wrote:3 years before AFC Wimbledon was formed, the old Wimbledon averaged 18,000 at home games.Hendo wrote:AFC Wimbledon?Winston Biscuit wrote:Cant help but think Bury's low attendances, and proximity to other big clubs, may well not help a Phoenix club progress too far
I seem to remember them ending with really low attendances and there are numerous other clubs close to Wimbledon.
Their hardcore of support will follow them.Winston Biscuit wrote:Cant help but think Bury's low attendances, and proximity to other big clubs, may well not help a Phoenix club progress too far
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests