Indeed. But the alternative to a football shirt does not have to mean dressing like an extra from a Danny Dyer Cinematic Opus either.Larry_Parnell wrote:Lots of people making lots of assumptions based on one photo (which shouldn't have been posted). Luckily, I'm sure you have perfect figures, know how to grow proper beards and are properly game. Relax, it's ok not to wear football shirts to football and it's ok to be young.
Alas, way too old but I don't begrudge the young their moment......however they want to spend ittidus_mi2 wrote:Are you the ginger Larry? It's ok we won't be mean to you.
K.URZ13 wrote:Grumpy old bastards. IN for flares.

Why shouldn't the picture have been posted?Larry_Parnell wrote:Lots of people making lots of assumptions based on one photo (which shouldn't have been posted).
Because it doesn't seem that it was something they agreed to and it identifies them to anonymous people who seem to take delight in denigrating them .tmesis wrote:Why shouldn't the picture have been posted?Larry_Parnell wrote:Lots of people making lots of assumptions based on one photo (which shouldn't have been posted).
Infringement of image rights?Larry_Parnell wrote:Because it doesn't seem that it was something they agreed to and it identifies them to anonymous people who seem to take delight in denigrating them .tmesis wrote:Why shouldn't the picture have been posted?Larry_Parnell wrote:Lots of people making lots of assumptions based on one photo (which shouldn't have been posted).
They're in a public place and playing up to the crowd. My sympathy is rather limited.Larry_Parnell wrote:Because it doesn't seem that it was something they agreed to and it identifies them to anonymous people who seem to take delight in denigrating them .tmesis wrote:Why shouldn't the picture have been posted?Larry_Parnell wrote:Lots of people making lots of assumptions based on one photo (which shouldn't have been posted).
+100,000CountryRoyal wrote:15 year olds with flares > OAPs sitting on their hands.
But anything else >>>>>>>> than either.sloughroyal123 wrote:+100,000CountryRoyal wrote:15 year olds with flares > OAPs sitting on their hands.
yeah I'm sure ginger balls has image rights.East Grinstead Royal wrote:Infringement of image rights?Larry_Parnell wrote:Because it doesn't seem that it was something they agreed to and it identifies them to anonymous people who seem to take delight in denigrating them .tmesis wrote:
Why shouldn't the picture have been posted?
+1CountryRoyal wrote:15 year olds with flares > OAPs sitting on their hands.
Rea Ding wrote:+1CountryRoyal wrote:15 year olds with flares > OAPs sitting on their hands.
I am glad we have had an increase in youthful support and I'm in for more flares and Danny dyers![]()
Tbh if they boost our away support and increase the atmosphere then it's worth a few cringy awkward moments
Royal Rother wrote:Jeez, maybe there should be about a dozen different sections for supporters who want to do different things so no-one gets offended.
Standing area (with seats)
Standing area (without seats)
Singing and chanting area
Blanket and thermos area
Pokemon Go area
Gesturing at away fans area
Remain seated at all times area
Drumming area
Fashion offence area
Breastfeeding area
Over 65 area
Tourette's area
A 66 year old new mother in a Superdry trackie who has bad circulation plus a coffee addiction and swears a lot might struggle to make a decision.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Orion1871, Polish International, tidus_mi2 and 645 guests