A deal has been proposed by Lord Ashcroft to put in 7.5 million which will cover the Russo loan etc..(.)Boobies(.) wrote:Watford receive a stay of execution over the repayment to the Russo family.
Now its up the brothers to accept this deal.
A deal has been proposed by Lord Ashcroft to put in 7.5 million which will cover the Russo loan etc..(.)Boobies(.) wrote:Watford receive a stay of execution over the repayment to the Russo family.
Well Russo is just a cock then.Super_horns wrote:Watford heading into Administration as Russo rejects clubs rescue proposal.
Seem you at the bottom.
by handbags_harris » 17 Dec 2009 19:15
17 Dec 2009 19:15That highlighted bit, that is where the Russo's were clever in that they secured the loans on Vicarage Road. WFC cannot afford to repay the money back by the deadline given, so the stadium effectively is about to be owned by the Russo's,via Valley Grown Salads.Bucks Dave wrote:Not quite. The £7.5 M is a rights issue and will cover the £4.8M owed to the Russos but not all the further £5.5M Watford must find by June. Selling Scott Loach in Jan may cover that shortfall. However, the motives of Ashcroft and Simpson in owning and running the club are still unclear. Ashcroft is not a Watford supporter but a businessman who likes to see a return. Ownership of Vicarage Road at a knockdown price could be lucrative. At the AGM as I understand it there was not even a representative of Ashcroft's identified.
At Reading we have one ego controlling things but quite open about his motives, at Watford they have competing egos battling for control with the fans way down the pecking order on knowing what's happening.Watford even sued their local paper when it was getting close to what was really going on.
Their supporters trust also seem to be completely supine.
The loan guys and players like Loach/DeMerit are going now plus even a few youngsters!Row Z Royal wrote:Well Russo is just a cock then.Super_horns wrote:Watford heading into Administration as Russo rejects clubs rescue proposal.
Seem you at the bottom.
by handbags_harris » 17 Dec 2009 19:39
17 Dec 2009 19:39My take on things is a touch more positive. Speaking to my mate Watford Tom and given the info he's provided, I honestly believe that the Russo's have done what they have done in the best interests of the club. Firstly, they knew they wouldn't be re-elected at the AGM, so left it until the last minute to resign. They then immediately call in the loans (secured on Vicarage Road) knowing full well that the holding company or Watford FC had no way of paying it by the deadline they had set. This leaves Vicarage Road in the Russo's hands, and away from Simpson and Ashcroft. Not only that, administration means that the club is put up for sale, and seeing as the Russo's already effectively own Vicarage Road, it leaves them in an incredibly strong position when it comes to buying the club. It is my guess that Jimmy Russo will be chairman at Watford Football Club by the end of the season, and Simpson and Ashcroft will be nowhere to be seen.Super_horns wrote:The loan guys and players like Loach/DeMerit are going now plus even a few youngsters!Row Z Royal wrote:Well Russo is just a cock then.Super_horns wrote:Watford heading into Administration as Russo rejects clubs rescue proposal.
Seem you at the bottom.
Anyone worth dosh I reckon.
Feel so sorry for Malky and the players.
We were looking at the play-offs but now its relegation.
Now we don't even owe the ground but Russos and their company do so goodness knows what they might do.
I've met Jimmy - bit like Danny De Vito's character in Taxi, but without his social graces - the foreign bit is irrelevant, but the rest of your sentence is about right.Royal Rother wrote:But the Russos are little and foreign so you'd have to be surprised if they weren't doing it all out of self-interest.
by handbags_harris » 17 Dec 2009 20:34
17 Dec 2009 20:34Could the self-interest bit be that they want full control of Watford FC without the isue of having Ashcroft and Simpson on board?wolsey wrote:I've met Jimmy - bit like Danny De Vito's character in Taxi, but without his social graces - the foreign bit is irrelevant, but the rest of your sentence is about right.Royal Rother wrote:But the Russos are little and foreign so you'd have to be surprised if they weren't doing it all out of self-interest.
by The whole year inn » 18 Dec 2009 08:24
18 Dec 2009 08:24
A 10 points deduction (?), and a freeze on Watford's buying of players. If Watford don't come out of administration by the seasons end, I think they gain another points deduction that will be carried into next season?The whole year inn wrote:what is the likely punishment for all this?
If they can't agree s CVA with the creditors - which usually happens when tax money is owed to HMRC, as they oppose agreements on principle - then they get another 15 points. Don't think Watford owe to HMRC so they should be Ok on that score.(.)Boobies(.) wrote:A 10 points deduction (?), and a freeze on Watford's buying of players. If Watford don't come out of administration by the seasons end, I think they gain another points deduction that will be carried into next season?The whole year inn wrote:what is the likely punishment for all this?
by handbags_harris » 18 Dec 2009 15:36
18 Dec 2009 15:36My understanding is that that's not strictly true though. If/when the club enter administration, that leaves the financial side of things in the hands of independent administrators, and the club is also up for sale. If I understand the situation correctly, my prediction is that with the Russo's now effectively owning Vicarage Road, they will be in a much stronger position to buy the club when it goes into administration. This would leave Simpson and Ashcroft out in the cold and also out of pocket as they would have to sell their shares at a valuation negotiated by the Russo's and the administrators, and leaves the Russo's engineered position intact.Ideal wrote:It sounds like Watford are in deep shit no matter what. This sort of conflict is likely to drag on for years. I can't see ether party backing down.
Yep - the administrator's job is to run the club and get in offers to purchase it. Then there's a vote amongst all of the creditors as to what offer to accept - if there's more than one, with votes allocated according to the size of debt for each creditor. Usually, this vote goes in favour of sale to the highest bidder (as creditors get most back that way), but not always. The Leeds "rescue" from administration was to a buyer offering less than a rival consortium, but was swung by the votes of a local digital radio station owned by a K Bates of Leeds - this "debt" was substantial and was discovered very late in the proceedings..... but I digress.handbags_harris wrote:My understanding is that that's not strictly true though. If/when the club enter administration, that leaves the financial side of things in the hands of independent administrators, and the club is also up for sale. If I understand the situation correctly, my prediction is that with the Russo's now effectively owning Vicarage Road, they will be in a much stronger position to buy the club when it goes into administration. This would leave Simpson and Ashcroft out in the cold and also out of pocket as they would have to sell their shares at a valuation negotiated by the Russo's and the administrators, and leaves the Russo's engineered position intact.Ideal wrote:It sounds like Watford are in deep shit no matter what. This sort of conflict is likely to drag on for years. I can't see ether party backing down.
For a pretty well balanced article on the matter, this has been forwarded to me:
http://www.twohundredpercent.net/?p=4096
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests