It was depressing enoughCountryRoyal wrote:Well done to those who travelled.
blythspartan wrote:Travelling back down today and upon reflection this is going to be the way it is with this young team. We virtually have an U23 team playing in a tough league one.
We’re lacking a bit of decent experience in midfield in my opinion. Someone like Hourihane, but ideally a couple of years younger. I don’t see any natural leaders like a Parky or Sidwell. We desperately need someone who can help out the youngsters and I am afraid Hutch isn’t the answer. He has the odd good game, but he’s a liability a lot of the time. I would give Craig a chance, although again he’s very young.
Hopefully, we can get enough points to survive and I think this group of players will improve during the course of the season, but it’s going to be a rollercoaster.
+1stealthpapes wrote:Well, sat at Preston Station.
That started promising, went bad, went really bad and then fizzled out, probably for the best.
Team seemed much more eager to put the ball forwards quickly than the last away games, which did not suit Ballard.
Soft penalty, rightly given.
Soft header for second.
Very soft third, don't stop!
Early (soft) fourth put game beyond us.
Trouble is, our experienced "leaders" aren't up to the task. Yiadom has been one of our serial losers over the Pauno and PInce eras. Hutchinson was poor. I think Dean needs to play to be an experienced head in there, and then Wing is a bit older too.blythspartan wrote:Travelling back down today and upon reflection this is going to be the way it is with this young team. We virtually have an U23 team playing in a tough league one.
We’re lacking a bit of decent experience in midfield in my opinion. Someone like Hourihane, but ideally a couple of years younger. I don’t see any natural leaders like a Parky or Sidwell. We desperately need someone who can help out the youngsters and I am afraid Hutch isn’t the answer. He has the odd good game, but he’s a liability a lot of the time. I would give Craig a chance, although again he’s very young.
Hopefully, we can get enough points to survive and I think this group of players will improve during the course of the season, but it’s going to be a rollercoaster.
I was wondering about Biden. He looked the businessWestYorksRoyal wrote: Trouble is, our experienced "leaders" aren't up to the task. Yiadom has been one of our serial losers over the Pauno and PInce eras. Hutchinson was poor. I think Dean needs to play to be an experienced head in there, and then Wing is a bit older too.
They were targeted yesterday along with Mola. Blackpool have a decent manager who's always been pretty spot on with tactics against us...add that to an experienced old pro up front.Snowball wrote:I was wondering about Biden. He looked the businessWestYorksRoyal wrote: Trouble is, our experienced "leaders" aren't up to the task. Yiadom has been one of our serial losers over the Pauno and PInce eras. Hutchinson was poor. I think Dean needs to play to be an experienced head in there, and then Wing is a bit older too.
up to his concussion. When he came back he had a terrible
first half, then seemed OK second half.
Not watched the last two games, so dunno, but maybe he is
not quite right, bring in Dean (or McIntyre) alongside Abbey for 2-3 games?
[EDIT]
On the other hand Bidon might be old and has other responsibilities.
BINDON!
Dean has played. Hasn't been great. And was a serial loser at Birmingham.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Trouble is, our experienced "leaders" aren't up to the task. Yiadom has been one of our serial losers over the Pauno and PInce eras. Hutchinson was poor. I think Dean needs to play to be an experienced head in there, and then Wing is a bit older too.blythspartan wrote:Travelling back down today and upon reflection this is going to be the way it is with this young team. We virtually have an U23 team playing in a tough league one.
We’re lacking a bit of decent experience in midfield in my opinion. Someone like Hourihane, but ideally a couple of years younger. I don’t see any natural leaders like a Parky or Sidwell. We desperately need someone who can help out the youngsters and I am afraid Hutch isn’t the answer. He has the odd good game, but he’s a liability a lot of the time. I would give Craig a chance, although again he’s very young.
Hopefully, we can get enough points to survive and I think this group of players will improve during the course of the season, but it’s going to be a rollercoaster.
I'd go Guiness-Walker. He's not the best defensively, but he's better than Mola and he can get forward well. He does at least try to stop crosses.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Mola clearly has pedigree coming through the Chelsea academy, playing for England U21s and being signed by Stuttgart. But Blackburn fans had nothing good to say about him, and so far he's done little to prove them wrong. I'm hoping that he's still getting up to speed and will improve in the next month, but I can't help that think he was a bit of a panic signing who we wouldn't have gone for without the Dai imposed restrictions.
I agree out of position McIntyre could be the best option there for now.
I think 5 at the back is too negative and still leaves the flanks exposed. The two upront are wasted because we don't get it to them.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Agreed the formation needs to change away from home. 4-2-2-2 offers the full backs no protection, and if teams beat our press Savage and Hutchinson get overrun. It was 5-3-2 second half yesterday - perhaps that is worthwhile from the start next time.
Though in our 2 worst away games (yesterday and Vale) we started well, and if you score early the game is different. 5-3-2 or 4-5-1 hands initiative to the opposition from the start.
We definitely need more in midfield away from home so a 4-5-1 would be ideal. I have always thought that you should try and win your home games by attacking teams and putting them under pressure, but on the road you need to be resolute and hard to beat. I’d love to see us get an ugly draw or a 1-0 away win.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think 5 at the back is too negative and still leaves the flanks exposed. The two upront are wasted because we don't get it to them.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Agreed the formation needs to change away from home. 4-2-2-2 offers the full backs no protection, and if teams beat our press Savage and Hutchinson get overrun. It was 5-3-2 second half yesterday - perhaps that is worthwhile from the start next time.
Though in our 2 worst away games (yesterday and Vale) we started well, and if you score early the game is different. 5-3-2 or 4-5-1 hands initiative to the opposition from the start.
So 4-5-1 away. Happy to stay with 4-4-2 at home (I reject the existance of 4-2-2-2, its stupid and not a thing.)
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], West F and 157 guests