by Tilehurst End » 26 Feb 2010 10:04
by brendywendy » 26 Feb 2010 11:02
by specialjon » 26 Feb 2010 11:27
by brendywendy » 26 Feb 2010 11:58
by Plymouth_Royal » 26 Feb 2010 12:29
specialjon Great to see we're still on the look out to boost the squad. Would be easy for us to sit back after the run of results we've had. Doesn't look good for rasiak or Thorvaldsson, seems bizarre we brought Thorvaldsson in after brendy left and Macca D obviously doesn't rate him.
by Tilehurst End » 26 Feb 2010 13:24
by Stranded » 27 Feb 2010 10:01
Tilehurst End Thor has not played much football in the last year or so but unfortunately won't get match fit unless he plays games so it's a vicious circle.
Would be interesting to know if the Mackail-Smith thing would have been a short term loan or with a view to permanent giving us Long, Church, Rasiak, Hunt,
Thor, Bignall, HRK, Mooney and M-S as strikers on our books.
by Ian Royal » 27 Feb 2010 13:14
by Royal Lady » 28 Feb 2010 16:31
Ian Royal Thought Thor's looked very bright in the few glimpses I've caught. But Mackail-Smith would be an excellent steal...
by Row Z Royal » 28 Feb 2010 17:10
Royal LadyIan Royal Thought Thor's looked very bright in the few glimpses I've caught. But Mackail-Smith would be an excellent steal...
If, after being 5-0, McD still prefers to bring on Robson-Kanu instead of letting Thor have a bit of a run out, it indicates to me that McD doesn't actually rate Thor much. He sits on the bench every week and he's never brought on.
by Royal Lady » 28 Feb 2010 17:21
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 28 Feb 2010 20:08
by brendywendy » 01 Mar 2010 10:29
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 01 Mar 2010 12:23
by brendywendy » 01 Mar 2010 16:44
by SpaceCruiser » 01 Mar 2010 16:54
Royal Lady Yeah, but as far as I'm aware, he hasn't started Thor and I think he came on for 10 mins once as a sub - so why bother taking him on loan. And he could have taken Khishnivilli or however you spell it, or Bertrand off and put someone else on, because they're "only" on loan too.
by brendywendy » 01 Mar 2010 16:59
by ZacNaloen » 01 Mar 2010 17:00
Royal Lady Yeah, but as far as I'm aware, he hasn't started Thor and I think he came on for 10 mins once as a sub - so why bother taking him on loan. And he could have taken Khishnivilli or however you spell it, or Bertrand off and put someone else on, because they're "only" on loan too.
by Ian Royal » 01 Mar 2010 17:23
Royal Lady Yeah, but as far as I'm aware, he hasn't started Thor and I think he came on for 10 mins once as a sub - so why bother taking him on loan. And he could have taken Khishnivilli or however you spell it, or Bertrand off and put someone else on, because they're "only" on loan too.
by Millsy » 01 Mar 2010 19:20
brendywendy i prefer
khizan
ishvilli
but same difference
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 146 guests