Silver FoxWycombe Royal I just hope they also have a plan with regards to how they will get all the additional cars to and from the stadium and where to park them.
2 words
Monorail
They'll put the cars on a monorail?

by Wycombe Royal » 21 Sep 2006 10:33
Silver FoxWycombe Royal I just hope they also have a plan with regards to how they will get all the additional cars to and from the stadium and where to park them.
2 words
Monorail
by royal goof » 21 Sep 2006 10:34
Dirk Gentlyroyal goofDirk Gently Start work on site at J11 Spring 2007 - expected to take 2 years.
http://www.reading.gov.uk/pressarticle.asp?id=sx9452-a781cdc7
There is No chance whatsoever that this work will be completed in 2 years.
It was intended to be a combined scheme with Mereoak however it involves 2 different Councils and the Mereoak scheme hasn't even got a planning application in yet so unless they do one scheme without the other the whole thing is going to take even longer..
Who says the two schemes are still combined - the WDC & RBC sites each have them as seperate works.
by working class hero » 21 Sep 2006 10:38
premiership_boundThe 17 Bus [quote="
I would also be loking at upping the price on the top seats in the ground, despite the idea that there are no bad views if the club are to maximise income then some blocks should be more expensive.
That's a bit unfair as people would not have the chance top move as all season tickets are sold.
by MartinRdg » 21 Sep 2006 10:45
anRDirk Gently And don't forget the club's own rationale that ticket prices have to be as high as they are now because of the small capacity.
So an increase in capacity will allow more reasonable prices to be set - if only for the less attractive games - whilst stil increasing overall revenue.
This will help increase demand and allow the games to be more accessible to the old, young and less well off.
You mean to say that the prices for our programs will drop back to £2.50 if we get relegated, like Crystal Palace's didn't, and ticket prices would drop with increased capacity after expansion like Arsenal's haven't?
by anR » 21 Sep 2006 10:47
MartinRdganRDirk Gently And don't forget the club's own rationale that ticket prices have to be as high as they are now because of the small capacity.
So an increase in capacity will allow more reasonable prices to be set - if only for the less attractive games - whilst stil increasing overall revenue.
This will help increase demand and allow the games to be more accessible to the old, young and less well off.
You mean to say that the prices for our programs will drop back to £2.50 if we get relegated, like Crystal Palace's didn't, and ticket prices would drop with increased capacity after expansion like Arsenal's haven't?
I think you will find there is still a waiting list at Arsenal so the demand is still there.
by cmonurz » 21 Sep 2006 11:59
by Stranded » 21 Sep 2006 12:12
by RG30 » 21 Sep 2006 12:27
by Custard Cream » 21 Sep 2006 12:28
Stranded Not understanding the complexities of planning law - is there a time limit between when approval is given and when building work begins or is it an ongoing approval?
For example, extending by 10K seats doesn't make much sense if we were to go down, would the club be able to put the plans on ice and then start work 3/4 years down the line or would they have to reapply?
by Elm Park » 21 Sep 2006 12:34
Silver FoxWycombe Royal I just hope they also have a plan with regards to how they will get all the additional cars to and from the stadium and where to park them.
2 words
Monorail
by Tony Le Mesmer » 21 Sep 2006 12:48
by Symposium » 21 Sep 2006 12:49
readingfc_4_life_and_beyocheeryoleary When the railway station is built, will it be called the Mad Stat?
Mad station.Yes.
by Rob-Royal » 21 Sep 2006 13:13
Tony Le Mesmer I supose the application has been made assuming the club establish themselves long term in the premiership.
With the exception of games like we have on Sat, you have to ask whether we really need to extend at all at the moment.
I believe tickets for our first 2 home games went on general sale, so demand is hardly outstripping supply.
Personally, i feel that our ground is just about perfect at the moment.
by royal goof » 21 Sep 2006 13:14
Stranded Not understanding the complexities of planning law - is there a time limit between when approval is given and when building work begins or is it an ongoing approval?
For example, extending by 10K seats doesn't make much sense if we were to go down, would the club be able to put the plans on ice and then start work 3/4 years down the line or would they have to reapply?
by Lower West » 21 Sep 2006 13:15
by FiNeRaIn » 21 Sep 2006 13:18
Tony Le Mesmer I supose the application has been made assuming the club establish themselves long term in the premiership.
With the exception of games like we have on Sat, you have to ask whether we really need to extend at all at the moment.
I believe tickets for our first 2 home games went on general sale, so demand is hardly outstripping supply.
Personally, i feel that our ground is just about perfect at the moment.
by Jaques Francais » 21 Sep 2006 13:26
Dirk GentlySilver FoxWycombe Royal I just hope they also have a plan with regards to how they will get all the additional cars to and from the stadium and where to park them.
2 words
Monorail
<pedant mode>
Isn't that actually one word?![]()
<\pedant mode>
by Spirit of Elm Park » 21 Sep 2006 13:27
by FiNeRaIn » 21 Sep 2006 13:30
Spirit of Elm Park I hear a lot of people saying that if we got relegated we would be back to 10k attendances. I don't agree with this.
Over the years, Elm park included, our attendances have risen and stayed high, I think the fact that we can now get 12k for a "reserve" cup game proves this.
If we could sell 30k plus even for half our games in the prem, I am sure we would see 24+k even if we did get relegated.
Users browsing this forum: Zammo and 108 guests