
by RoyalBlue » 25 Jun 2008 20:14
Rev Algenon Stickleback HRoyaleebrendywendy oh cmon
suyrely the king of mistakes is someone a bit higher profile
coppell is just the grand vizier, or arch duke of mistakes
The guy is a walking mistake. The worst thing is that he doesn't appear to have learnt from any of them either given his lack of tact regarding Little
what "lack of tact" ?and the fact that he evidently did no forward-planning whatsoever come the end of the season!
by Arnie_Pie » 25 Jun 2008 20:16
Royal Rother You really are priceless Royalee, with this almost retarded "King of Mistakes" routine.
How many managers can you name who have won the Manager of the Year award 2 years running, one when in the CCC, the other in the PL?
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 25 Jun 2008 21:15
Royalee Any successful businessman talks up their chances of retaining important staff and does their utmost to keep them - more often than not it pushes up the price they are paid to let them go, which is exactly what United are doing with Ronaldo. They know Ronaldo's off, doesn't mean they have to admit it in the press so that Madrid can pounce and get him without a fight. You'd know this of course if you knew how to negotiate.
I know there was no forward planning by us not having offered Little something sooner, Coppell's comments that someone will now have to claim the right sided position (which indicates he wasn't looking at any previously) and the fact that we have not made any rumblings about bringing anyone in yet.
by Royalee » 25 Jun 2008 23:06
by Royal Rother » 25 Jun 2008 23:20
by royalsteve » 25 Jun 2008 23:39
Rev Algenon Stickleback HRoyalee Any successful businessman talks up their chances of retaining important staff and does their utmost to keep them - more often than not it pushes up the price they are paid to let them go, which is exactly what United are doing with Ronaldo. They know Ronaldo's off, doesn't mean they have to admit it in the press so that Madrid can pounce and get him without a fight. You'd know this of course if you knew how to negotiate.
I know there was no forward planning by us not having offered Little something sooner, Coppell's comments that someone will now have to claim the right sided position (which indicates he wasn't looking at any previously) and the fact that we have not made any rumblings about bringing anyone in yet.
what "businessmen" are you talking about exactly (and what is your personal experience of business anyway?)
Business doesn't have transfer fees or tabloid speculation. Businessmen therefore don't talk up their chances of retaining staff, as its never discussed.
Besides, are you really trying to suggest we didn't try and keep Little? Do you really think we didn't try and keep Sidwell? Do you think we haven't tried all we can to keep Shorey?
Any businessman would know that a member of staff that wants to leave will be far less productive than they could be, and even if you offer them more money, it won't make them happier, and they'll still look to move anyway.
There's also little we can do do push up the price of our players. Even the ones who are wanted are typically just options for bigger clubs. They aren't players that clubs want at almost any price. If we hold out for more, like we did with Shorey last year, then we won't sell. In some ways that would be a success, but if it means having an unhappy unproductive player who could go on a free at the end of the season, what exactly have we achieved?
by readingbedding » 25 Jun 2008 23:41
by Archie's penalty » 25 Jun 2008 23:47
readingbedding I understand the frustration from the frustrated posters.
All the press speculation and the hysteria on this board would point to the fact that the Club is a carcass, and there are vultures circling over our players.
Personally, I think that the vultures have been circling around our players for a very long time.
But we were in a strong position...the players wanted to see how far they could go with the team, I admire that, they wanted to continue, they felt as the job wasn't done.
Only now are we prostrate in the desert, waiting for these clubs to cherry-pick, tempt and persuade the relevant players that the journey is over and it's time to move on.
As a supporter of RFC, I cannot do that, with a 7000 reduction in STH's it seems that the journey is over (in most cases) for them too.
Fact of life, good luck to the players, and good luck to the tourists - thanks for everything!!!
Due to our recent success, players have been content to stay, apart from Sidwell and, maybe at a push Ashdown, now Little I can't think of too many RFC players in recent history that left who we wanted to keep...
I've been accused of being an RTG, I don't really like that acronym, I'm a bit more pragmatic than blind optimism or dark negativity
What's also important is who we're going to bring in to energise and improve the team.
Anyway, this has been said millions of times before, let's wait until end of July, then debate.
It's like cutting off your eyelids at the moment.
by readingbedding » 25 Jun 2008 23:55
Archie's penaltyreadingbedding I understand the frustration from the frustrated posters.
All the press speculation and the hysteria on this board would point to the fact that the Club is a carcass, and there are vultures circling over our players.
Personally, I think that the vultures have been circling around our players for a very long time.
But we were in a strong position...the players wanted to see how far they could go with the team, I admire that, they wanted to continue, they felt as the job wasn't done.
Only now are we prostrate in the desert, waiting for these clubs to cherry-pick, tempt and persuade the relevant players that the journey is over and it's time to move on.
As a supporter of RFC, I cannot do that, with a 7000 reduction in STH's it seems that the journey is over (in most cases) for them too.
Fact of life, good luck to the players, and good luck to the tourists - thanks for everything!!!
Due to our recent success, players have been content to stay, apart from Sidwell and, maybe at a push Ashdown, now Little I can't think of too many RFC players in recent history that left who we wanted to keep...
I've been accused of being an RTG, I don't really like that acronym, I'm a bit more pragmatic than blind optimism or dark negativity
What's also important is who we're going to bring in to energise and improve the team.
Anyway, this has been said millions of times before, let's wait until end of July, then debate.
It's like cutting off your eyelids at the moment.
Well said RB, well said. I don't think the journey is over though. We will be back...
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 25 Jun 2008 23:58
royalsteveRev Algenon Stickleback HRoyalee Any successful businessman talks up their chances of retaining important staff and does their utmost to keep them - more often than not it pushes up the price they are paid to let them go, which is exactly what United are doing with Ronaldo. They know Ronaldo's off, doesn't mean they have to admit it in the press so that Madrid can pounce and get him without a fight. You'd know this of course if you knew how to negotiate.
I know there was no forward planning by us not having offered Little something sooner, Coppell's comments that someone will now have to claim the right sided position (which indicates he wasn't looking at any previously) and the fact that we have not made any rumblings about bringing anyone in yet.
what "businessmen" are you talking about exactly (and what is your personal experience of business anyway?)
Business doesn't have transfer fees or tabloid speculation. Businessmen therefore don't talk up their chances of retaining staff, as its never discussed.
Besides, are you really trying to suggest we didn't try and keep Little? Do you really think we didn't try and keep Sidwell? Do you think we haven't tried all we can to keep Shorey?
Any businessman would know that a member of staff that wants to leave will be far less productive than they could be, and even if you offer them more money, it won't make them happier, and they'll still look to move anyway.
There's also little we can do do push up the price of our players. Even the ones who are wanted are typically just options for bigger clubs. They aren't players that clubs want at almost any price. If we hold out for more, like we did with Shorey last year, then we won't sell. In some ways that would be a success, but if it means having an unhappy unproductive player who could go on a free at the end of the season, what exactly have we achieved?
you have completely missed his point.....this is exactly what i think man u are doing with ronaldo....ferguson and his chairman arent stupid...they will survive without ronaldo and if they get £100m for him they will laugh their way to the bank.....they could replace him with 2 or 3 world class players and still have £50m left!!
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 26 Jun 2008 00:01
Royalee Christ I'm dealing with idiots.
by readingbedding » 26 Jun 2008 00:04
Rev Algenon Stickleback HRoyalee Christ I'm dealing with idiots.
No. You're just a typical 20 year old, convinced he's utterly right in every opinion he has without a shade of doubt, mainly because you've never had time to really think about anything or experience anything.
by Archie's penalty » 26 Jun 2008 00:14
readingbeddingRev Algenon Stickleback HRoyalee Christ I'm dealing with idiots.
No. You're just a typical 20 year old, convinced he's utterly right in every opinion he has without a shade of doubt, mainly because you've never had time to really think about anything or experience anything.
He's just frustrated, he had a hunch that the situation (supposedly) would unravel for the worse, and he feels that the Club is incompetant and could be doing better.
Perhaps nothing to compare it to.
by readingbedding » 26 Jun 2008 00:17
by RoyalBlue » 26 Jun 2008 08:17
readingbedding I understand the frustration from the frustrated posters.
All the press speculation and the hysteria on this board would point to the fact that the Club is a carcass, and there are vultures circling over our players.
Personally, I think that the vultures have been circling around our players for a very long time.
But we were in a strong position...the players wanted to see how far they could go with the team, I admire that, they wanted to continue, they felt as the job wasn't done.
Only now are we prostrate in the desert, waiting for these clubs to cherry-pick, tempt and persuade the relevant players that the journey is over and it's time to move on.
As a supporter of RFC, I cannot do that, with a 7000 reduction in STH's it seems that the journey is over (in most cases) for them too.
Fact of life, good luck to the players, and good luck to the tourists - thanks for everything!!!
Due to our recent success, players have been content to stay, apart from Sidwell and, maybe at a push Ashdown, now Little I can't think of too many RFC players in recent history that left who we wanted to keep...
I've been accused of being an RTG, I don't really like that acronym, I'm a bit more pragmatic than blind optimism or dark negativity
What's also important is who we're going to bring in to energise and improve the team.
Anyway, this has been said millions of times before, let's wait until end of July, then debate.
It's like cutting off your eyelids at the moment.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 26 Jun 2008 09:03
and that's my feeling too. The club made mistakes, quite a few of them. The truth is that all clubs make mistakes, but we've made so few, or at least so few that have had any impact over the last 10 years, that people tend to forget that the football world doesn't perpetually smell of roses. Football is typically cyclic in nature, with good spells and bad ones, and the bad ones are typically a result of being unable to pay for a higher level of football.readingbeddingRev Algenon Stickleback HRoyalee Christ I'm dealing with idiots.
No. You're just a typical 20 year old, convinced he's utterly right in every opinion he has without a shade of doubt, mainly because you've never had time to really think about anything or experience anything.
He's just frustrated, he had a hunch that the situation (supposedly) would unravel for the worse, and he feels that the Club is incompetant and could be doing better.
Perhaps nothing to compare it to.
by Roger the Rabbit » 26 Jun 2008 09:39
RoyalBlue
We're repeatedly told they are constantly looking and they probably are. It just seems as though they need a damn guide/search and rescue dog to help them find anyone!!
by loyalroyal4life » 26 Jun 2008 12:16
by Alan Partridge » 26 Jun 2008 12:30
loyalroyal4life If harper, sonko, shorey and hunt go we will be fine.
Harper - doesnt really compliment marek who will be key for us next season. We need to bring someone in there.
Sonko - shown what a liability he is and doesnt look like he will recapture his past sparkling form.
Shorey - Think none of us are going to be surprised at him going, as expected really. Sure we could find a decent enough replacement if not rosenior could do a job.
Hunt - since signing new contract has looked awful every game. Can get decent amount of money for him enabling us to strengthen possibly both wings although i think convey would do well for us on the left.
WHAT I WILL be worried about is if the likes of Kitson and doyle and even lita move on. If we keep our 4 strikers even if it is just for 1 season, we are guaranteed goals!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests