by rg6royal » 08 Jan 2008 07:58
by Barry the bird boggler » 08 Jan 2008 10:00
by Ian Royal » 08 Jan 2008 15:53
by Alan Partridge » 08 Jan 2008 16:36
Ian Royal I still don't think we openly lie in the press.
That means no strikers.
by Big Foot » 04 Jun 2010 17:08
rg6royal Portsmouth and Reading are interested in signing Lille forward Nicolas Fauverge. (The Times)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 176238.stm
Ian Royal I still don't think we openly lie in the press.
That means no strikers.
by Norfolk Royal » 04 Jun 2010 19:39
Sun TzuIan Royal I still don't think we openly lie in the press.
That means no strikers.
Interestingly the quotes from Hammond and McDermott (assuming they are accurate) do not entirely rule out bringing in a new striker....although they lead you to draw that conclusion
RobRoyalSun TzuIan Royal I still don't think we openly lie in the press.
That means no strikers.
Interestingly the quotes from Hammond and McDermott (assuming they are accurate) do not entirely rule out bringing in a new striker....although they lead you to draw that conclusion
Eerily, Ian's post was from Jan 2008 but was entirely relevant!
by Mike Hunt » 05 Jun 2010 00:19
Big Footrg6royal Portsmouth and Reading are interested in signing Lille forward Nicolas Fauverge. (The Times)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 176238.stm
Heard this is back on
RobRoyalSun TzuIan Royal I still don't think we openly lie in the press.
That means no strikers.
Interestingly the quotes from Hammond and McDermott (assuming they are accurate) do not entirely rule out bringing in a new striker....although they lead you to draw that conclusion
Eerily, Ian's post was from Jan 2008 but was entirely relevant!
by Sun Tzu » 05 Jun 2010 19:06
by Big Foot » 06 Jun 2010 10:55
Mike HuntBig Footrg6royal Portsmouth and Reading are interested in signing Lille forward Nicolas Fauverge. (The Times)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 176238.stm
Heard this is back on
I dont know anything about old mate Nick, but his games to goal ratio is not the best (For Lille that is with 9 in 75. Not bad for on loan Lige 2 side RC Strasbourg though, with 10 goals in 19 games).
Snowball will not like these figures. Slong is better.
by Upper West Ginger » 08 Jun 2010 12:22
Big FootMike Huntrg6royal Portsmouth and Reading are interested in signing Lille forward Nicolas Fauverge. (The Times)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 176238.stm
I dont know anything about old mate Nick, but his games to goal ratio is not the best (For Lille that is with 9 in 75. Not bad for on loan Lige 2 side RC Strasbourg though, with 10 goals in 19 games).
Snowball will not like these figures. Slong is better.
Tbf that's still better than Gunnar Thorvaldsson and that didn't stop us bringing him to these shores
by Ian Royal » 08 Jun 2010 22:52
by brendywendy » 09 Jun 2010 10:55
Upper West GingerBig FootMike Hunt I dont know anything about old mate Nick, but his games to goal ratio is not the best (For Lille that is with 9 in 75. Not bad for on loan Lige 2 side RC Strasbourg though, with 10 goals in 19 games).
Snowball will not like these figures. Slong is better.
Tbf that's still better than Gunnar Thorvaldsson and that didn't stop us bringing him to these shores
Well I'd like to think we have learned a lesson from the Thorvaldsson debacle, and that we would avoid any repetition.
by Upper West Ginger » 10 Jun 2010 09:29
brendywendyUpper West Ginger
Well I'd like to think we have learned a lesson from the Thorvaldsson debacle, and that we would avoid any repetition.
the throvaldsson debacle where we took a bloke cheaply on loan while our strikers struggled, he didnt fit in so we sent him back, and in the mean time our strikers started scoring.
what a oxf*rd debacle
by brendywendy » 10 Jun 2010 10:36
by Upper West Ginger » 10 Jun 2010 12:06
brendywendy at the time we needed A: a striker who could play, or B: a striker who could shake up our other forwards and get them playing.
his wages from rubbish swedish club or wherever he was from would have been a drop in the ocean, and wasd a cheap gamble that could have come off, but didnt
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 126 guests