by NR_Royal » 20 Nov 2010 20:09
by Tony Le Mesmer » 20 Nov 2010 22:16
by leon » 20 Nov 2010 23:06
Tony Le Mesmer No doubting Armstrong is a much better defender than Harte. But he doesnt smash in Free Kicks for fun, hit 50 yard passes to feet and create plaenty of chances.
You can make a case for either, but BM clearly thinks we are better off as a whole with Harte playing. So do i.
We ARE going to finish mid table this season and id rather watch a player with Harte's talent, with defensive frailties, than just a solid left back.
by Snowball » 21 Nov 2010 12:08
Tony Le Mesmer No doubting Armstrong is a much better defender than Harte. But he doesnt smash in Free Kicks for fun, hit 50 yard passes to feet and create plaenty of chances.
You can make a case for either, but BM clearly thinks we are better off as a whole with Harte playing. So do i.
We ARE going to finish mid table this season and id rather watch a player with Harte's talent, with defensive frailties, than just a solid left back.
by Ian Royal » 21 Nov 2010 19:40
Tony Le Mesmer No doubting Armstrong is a much better defender than Harte. But he doesnt smash in Free Kicks for fun, hit 50 yard passes to feet and create plaenty of chances.
You can make a case for either, but BM clearly thinks we are better off as a whole with Harte playing. So do i.
We ARE going to finish mid table this season and id rather watch a player with Harte's talent, with defensive frailties, than just a solid left back.
by Snowball » 21 Nov 2010 20:45
Ian Royal
Well if Harte was injured we may well see how Armstrong does for us and whether Harte can get back in the team. Harte hasn't really done a great deal to require dropping. But at the same time if he's out for a couple of games and Armstrong does well I don't think he's necessarily done well enough to be brought straight back in.
by Snowball » 22 Nov 2010 14:32
by Focher » 22 Nov 2010 15:04
by Snowball » 22 Nov 2010 15:40
by Gordons Cumming » 22 Nov 2010 15:48
Snowball Neither of those are Karacan or Mills.
It looks like a still from a movie.
by Ian Royal » 22 Nov 2010 18:08
Gordons CummingSnowball Neither of those are Karacan or Mills.
It looks like a still from a movie.
I think you're quite witty.
You shirley can't be getting whooshes all the time.
by Snowball » 23 Nov 2010 20:31
by Elmer Park » 24 Nov 2010 09:48
by Snowball » 24 Nov 2010 10:52
Elmer Park Almost all McDermott's decisions are positive ones so if Harte is fit to play then I think he will get the nod over Armstrong for the foreseeable future. I am not sure I would make the same decision but I think it is a difficult call. Harte defensive shortcomings are obvious but to be fair to him he is pretty good in the air considering he isn't the tallest player and that is a useful factor defensively.
by Royal With Cheese » 24 Nov 2010 12:38
Snowball I take the manager's experience and considered judgment of a thousand knee-jerking fans any day
by Snowball » 24 Nov 2010 13:45
Royal With CheeseSnowball I take the manager's experience and considered judgment of a thousand knee-jerking fans any day
This is the manager who thinks the tackle on Harte by Holt wasn't a red card offence?
by Snowball » 24 Nov 2010 13:49
by RobRoyal » 24 Nov 2010 13:55
SnowballElmer Park Almost all McDermott's decisions are positive ones so if Harte is fit to play then I think he will get the nod over Armstrong for the foreseeable future. I am not sure I would make the same decision but I think it is a difficult call. Harte defensive shortcomings are obvious but to be fair to him he is pretty good in the air considering he isn't the tallest player and that is a useful factor defensively.
This is the real point. Does anyone doubt that McDermott doesn't see the advantages and disadvantages of various players.
I take the manager's experience and considered judgment of a thousand knee-jerking fans any day
by Royal With Cheese » 24 Nov 2010 14:05
Snowball A manager sees his players in training every day.
He sees what they can do and cannot do.
He can make long-term and reasoned judgments.
The incident of Harte-Holt is not REMOTELY the same.
Intent is debatable, Harte's actual pain or non-pain is debatable.
There are video-replays that can be watched interminably.
There is also a political element to what the manager says.
And he and I disagree? Shucks! I say Holt should have been sent off IF HE HAD MADE NO CONTACT WITH HARTE WHATSOEVER, because he lifted both feet off the ground and went in studs first. END OF. It is not the result that matters but (a) intent and (b) recklessness.
by Hoop Blah » 24 Nov 2010 14:07
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 144 guests