by Royal Rother » 06 Mar 2011 08:36
by Snowball » 06 Mar 2011 08:47
2 world wars, 1 world cup
On what basis is he good now? Oh... goals. The ONE thing some people sidestepped and made excuses for by changing the goalposts a million times.
Those of us who stuck to our guns saying he was awful until he started scoring (even though the worst striker in the history of the club was given the longest fruitless runout in the history of the club) are now smiling with delight. Those of us pretending that was the one thing he *didn't* need to do because he ran a lot/won penalties/worked hard/was kind to animals/took good penalties/tired out the opposition/good play stairway-to-heaven must now be feeling a little dumb.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 06 Mar 2011 09:02
by LoyalRoyal22 » 06 Mar 2011 13:48
Wongle Please understand this Brian.
by SCIAG » 06 Mar 2011 20:37
Avon Royal 4-4-2 > 4-3-3
Blaming Long for a shit formation is moronic.
by readingbedding » 06 Mar 2011 20:48
by leon » 06 Mar 2011 22:54
readingbedding long is rubbish isn't he.
by Royal Rother » 06 Mar 2011 23:05
by leon » 06 Mar 2011 23:20
Royal Rother I'd need to see some stats to be convinced of that.
by yappy » 06 Mar 2011 23:23
by Ian Royal » 07 Mar 2011 17:40
yappy It's quite easy to say that currently Long > Church, but at the time this thread was created I actually agree that Church should've been given a go instead of Long. Church finished last season off very well, had a terrific pre-season and had plenty of confidence, whereas Long didn't really look like scoring (although I do think the formation played a part in that). I'm not claiming Church is/was a better player, I just think at that time he should've been given his chance, but obviously since then the tides have turned somewhat.
Credit to Long, and McDermott for sticking by him, but it has probably affected Church and I believe Church is alot better player than what we're currrently seeing of him.
by PEARCEY » 07 Mar 2011 19:41
Ian Royalyappy It's quite easy to say that currently Long > Church, but at the time this thread was created I actually agree that Church should've been given a go instead of Long. Church finished last season off very well, had a terrific pre-season and had plenty of confidence, whereas Long didn't really look like scoring (although I do think the formation played a part in that). I'm not claiming Church is/was a better player, I just think at that time he should've been given his chance, but obviously since then the tides have turned somewhat.
Credit to Long, and McDermott for sticking by him, but it has probably affected Church and I believe Church is alot better player than what we're currrently seeing of him.
Spot on IMO.
by Snowball » 07 Mar 2011 23:21
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot] and 325 guests