by Friday's Legacy » 10 May 2012 17:48
by Jackson Corner » 10 May 2012 17:50
cmonurz wrote:I'm sure the biggest kit deal in British football history has made up for that devastating 'fact'.
by cmonurz » 10 May 2012 18:10
by 1871 Royal » 10 May 2012 18:26
Friday's Legacy wrote:Like the collar, love the badge, but who is that kit provider? The logo cheapens the shirt.
by Handsome Man » 10 May 2012 19:58
cmonurz wrote:American subsidiary of New Balance, apparently. I'm not totally convinced that the target market for football shirts is less likely to buy a replica shirt because it's not made by Adidas.
by URZZ » 10 May 2012 20:38
Friday's Legacy wrote:Like the collar, love the badge, but who is that kit provider? The logo cheapens the shirt.
by Cobi » 10 May 2012 21:30
URZZ wrote:
Well they've obviously manufactured it rather well whoever they are so credit to them![]()
Amazing shirt
by URZZ » 10 May 2012 21:41
by Whore Jackie » 10 May 2012 22:11

by daswonder » 10 May 2012 23:12

by Whore Jackie » 11 May 2012 06:02



by cmonurz » 11 May 2012 07:06
by TBM » 11 May 2012 07:12
cmonurz wrote:Hmm, it's alright, preferred the other one.
by paultheroyal » 11 May 2012 07:58
by who are ya? » 11 May 2012 09:43
by Geekins » 11 May 2012 10:08
cmonurz wrote:Hmm, it's alright, preferred the other one.
who are ya? wrote:Some Liverpool fans not happy that the old skoool badge is back without the twin flames for the 96..
Surely the Hillsborough cow is running out of milk
by URZZ » 11 May 2012 17:10
No Fixed Abode wrote:
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs and 229 guests