by statto » 06 Feb 2014 12:53
by Green » 06 Feb 2014 15:19
by LUX » 06 Feb 2014 15:24
by Green » 06 Feb 2014 15:34
by YateleyRoyal » 06 Feb 2014 15:47
by under the tin » 06 Feb 2014 15:53
LUX Lmao
by RoyalBlue » 06 Feb 2014 18:04
by notloyalenuffroyal » 06 Feb 2014 18:51
by FridaysGhost » 06 Feb 2014 19:43
by Faithful Son » 06 Feb 2014 22:01
RoyalBlue I detest what happened with Wimbledon but does that really make Pete Winkelman one of the ten worst chairmen? Seems he did and does a pretty good job for MKD. What's more, what he did to Wimbledon was more the fault of the footballing authorities who allowed it to happen - afterall, it was only little old Wimbledon.
And I'm not sure I would be totally peed off if, in return for significant ongoing investment, a chairman wanted to call us Reading Royals FC.
Maybe a tad hypocritical as I'm not a great fan of Chairmen naming stadia after themselves, even if it was 'someone else's idea'!
by Percy's Rocket » 06 Feb 2014 22:11
by genome » 06 Feb 2014 22:57
Green Bob Fossil
by Ian Royal » 07 Feb 2014 11:47
RoyalBlue I detest what happened with Wimbledon but does that really make Pete Winkelman one of the ten worst chairmen? Seems he did and does a pretty good job for MKD. What's more, what he did to Wimbledon was more the fault of the footballing authorities who allowed it to happen - afterall, it was only little old Wimbledon.
And I'm not sure I would be totally peed off if, in return for significant ongoing investment, a chairman wanted to call us Reading Royals FC.
Maybe a tad hypocritical as I'm not a great fan of Chairmen naming stadia after themselves, even if it was 'someone else's idea'!
by RoyalBlue » 07 Feb 2014 14:26
Faithful SonRoyalBlue I detest what happened with Wimbledon but does that really make Pete Winkelman one of the ten worst chairmen? Seems he did and does a pretty good job for MKD. What's more, what he did to Wimbledon was more the fault of the footballing authorities who allowed it to happen - afterall, it was only little old Wimbledon.
And I'm not sure I would be totally peed off if, in return for significant ongoing investment, a chairman wanted to call us Reading Royals FC.
Maybe a tad hypocritical as I'm not a great fan of Chairmen naming stadia after themselves, even if it was 'someone else's idea'!
Tbf to Mr. Mad, he only named the stadium after himself because nobody else was remotely interested in paying for the privilege. Also he stumped up the money to pay for the thing to be built so why not?
Ian RoyalRoyalBlue I detest what happened with Wimbledon but does that really make Pete Winkelman one of the ten worst chairmen? Seems he did and does a pretty good job for MKD. What's more, what he did to Wimbledon was more the fault of the footballing authorities who allowed it to happen - afterall, it was only little old Wimbledon.
And I'm not sure I would be totally peed off if, in return for significant ongoing investment, a chairman wanted to call us Reading Royals FC.
Maybe a tad hypocritical as I'm not a great fan of Chairmen naming stadia after themselves, even if it was 'someone else's idea'!
I'd be furious. I wasn't happy about the name of the stadium either, but once a thing is named, it shouldn't be changed.
by Extended-Phenotype » 07 Feb 2014 16:22
by Ian Royal » 07 Feb 2014 16:42
Extended-Phenotype Regarding the article, why does everything have to be conveyed to me in a f/cking slideshow these days? Wiki-answers is the worst, what the actual F?CK
"The best way..." CLICK
"to dispose..." CLICK
"of a body is..." CLICK
"to first..." CLICK
"make sure you..." OH FOR THE LOVE OF SHIT
by Tad Showbiz » 07 Feb 2014 18:01
by Reading4eva » 08 Feb 2014 08:35
by From Despair To Where? » 08 Feb 2014 09:15
by Badger Finger » 08 Feb 2014 09:28
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 180 guests