Sanguine Couple of commentaries saying he has actually chipped or lost a tooth doing it.
Good, he should have the rest of them taken out as well.
by sandman » 24 Jun 2014 19:18
Sanguine Couple of commentaries saying he has actually chipped or lost a tooth doing it.
by Stranded » 24 Jun 2014 19:18
Whore JackieSanguine Wouldn't surprise me if he is looking at a 6 month/season long ban, as a third incident, plus the racism.
Liverpool now have a player they can't play or sell.
Not sure how far FIFA's jurisdiction extends to with regard domestic matches.
by Bandini » 24 Jun 2014 19:34
by genome » 24 Jun 2014 19:36
by soggy biscuit » 24 Jun 2014 19:49
by Libertine » 24 Jun 2014 19:53
by Victor Meldrew » 24 Jun 2014 19:54
Bandini You wonder how much Liverpool are to blame, after indulging him over the previous biting and racism incidents.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 24 Jun 2014 19:55
by Victor Meldrew » 24 Jun 2014 19:58
MmmMonsterMunch What a horrible little cnut that Suarez is.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 24 Jun 2014 19:59
Victor MeldrewMmmMonsterMunch What a horrible little cnut that Suarez is.
Well that must be the most original post of the year.
Everybody, even Liverpool fans feel that , but football regrettably is full of them and always will be .
by MmmMonsterMunch » 24 Jun 2014 20:02
by Victor Meldrew » 24 Jun 2014 20:08
MmmMonsterMunchVictor MeldrewMmmMonsterMunch What a horrible little cnut that Suarez is.
Well that must be the most original post of the year.
Everybody, even Liverpool fans feel that , but football regrettably is full of them and always will be .
What's your point? He is a horrible little cnut.
by Ouroboros » 24 Jun 2014 20:08
by MmmMonsterMunch » 24 Jun 2014 20:08
by multisync1830 » 24 Jun 2014 20:09
Victor MeldrewBandini You wonder how much Liverpool are to blame, after indulging him over the previous biting and racism incidents.
Not sure what the indulgence was that any club would have done differently with such a financial asset.
Yes, those scousers actively encourage that sort of thing and should control their players off-season when they are thousands of miles away.
If he has bitten him that is the fastest bite you will ever see-try biting somebody when you are running.
I think it was an attempted head butt (just as bad) .
Deluded or what?
by MmmMonsterMunch » 24 Jun 2014 20:13
by Victor Meldrew » 24 Jun 2014 20:13
multisync1830Victor MeldrewBandini You wonder how much Liverpool are to blame, after indulging him over the previous biting and racism incidents.
Not sure what the indulgence was that any club would have done differently with such a financial asset.
Yes, those scousers actively encourage that sort of thing and should control their players off-season when they are thousands of miles away.
If he has bitten him that is the fastest bite you will ever see-try biting somebody when you are running.
I think it was an attempted head butt (just as bad) .
Deluded or what?
none as blind as those who will not see....You are just a sad reflection of all that is wrong with the game.
by Sanguine » 24 Jun 2014 20:20
MmmMonsterMunch Well the scousers are fcuked now if they did want to cash in! What do we think? 15 games? 20?
Barca are quite a classy outfit - I cannot for the life of me think why they'd pay a shitload of money to bring that sort of trouble to their club.
by multisync1830 » 24 Jun 2014 20:23
SanguineMmmMonsterMunch Well the scousers are fcuked now if they did want to cash in! What do we think? 15 games? 20?
Barca are quite a classy outfit - I cannot for the life of me think why they'd pay a shitload of money to bring that sort of trouble to their club.
Sky says FIFA's rules allow for a ban of up to two years for biting. As I posted already, given this is a third bite, plus the ban for racism, I think he's looking at a year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests