How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

2058 posts
No Fixed Abode

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by No Fixed Abode » 25 Feb 2016 10:02

Maneki Neko spacepalm


You can't handle the truth.

bracksroyal10
Member
Posts: 608
Joined: 17 Apr 2012 12:14
Location: Bracknell

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by bracksroyal10 » 25 Feb 2016 10:02

Agree with the comments about 4-5-1, apart from the penalty incident that went our way thankfully, very rarely did Rotherham threaten at all.

What I don't understand at all is why on earth we are punting balls to Kermogant when he has x2 6ft + defenders challenging him in the air?

You would have thought after the 5th time of it happening, we would have started to play the ball on the floor, Rotherham were there for the taking and it would have been so much more had we gone with 4-4-2 from the off.

Don't understand why we are restricting ourselves so much against opposition like this, IMO should have played 4-4-2 with the combo Rakels and Cox up front for a bit of pace

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Maneki Neko » 25 Feb 2016 10:13

Don't understand why we are restricting ourselves so much against opposition like this


you've seen our form generally this year yeah?
especially against the shit teams....

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26477
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by genome » 25 Feb 2016 10:14

Can't quite figure out why some are still moaning, did we not win :?:

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26868
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Silver Fox » 25 Feb 2016 10:22

Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.
Bad teams don't win titles but efficient teams can finish ahead of good footballing teams.


If only there was some way to judge who was the best team over a decent sample size, say 46 games?

No Fixed Abode And no offence but you're probably pissed at most home games. Things always look better when you're pissed. I should know m8!


None taken m8, probably the most vaLOLid point you've ever made


Longhorn1970
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1437
Joined: 17 Dec 2015 20:25

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Longhorn1970 » 25 Feb 2016 10:30

Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.
Bad teams don't win titles but efficient teams can finish ahead of good footballing teams.


Are you taking the p*ss

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5981
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Extended-Phenotype » 25 Feb 2016 10:31

genome Can't quite figure out why some are still moaning, did we not win :?:


Apparently it matters to kes if we 'only' beat Rotheram by 'only' one goal, rather than the 3 points completely contradicting himself that points are all that matter when comparing Clarke and Brian! 

Loolz, he's a confused wee lad.‎

OLLIE KEARNS
Member
Posts: 436
Joined: 23 May 2008 10:30
Location: East Berks

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by OLLIE KEARNS » 25 Feb 2016 10:50

Longhorn1970
Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.
Bad teams don't win titles but efficient teams can finish ahead of good footballing teams.


Are you taking the p*ss


In perhaps the longest (46 games), most competitive, most arduous league in world football it is very safe to say that the best team ALWAYS wins this league. Our last league winning side conceded less goals and won more games than any other side in the league which is kind of what good teams do.
Best footballing team is a completely different discussion to best team. I know many Arsenal fans who would happily sacrifice the "best footballing team" tag to actually win the league and become the best team.

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7799
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by tidus_mi2 » 25 Feb 2016 10:55

Longhorn1970
Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.
Bad teams don't win titles but efficient teams can finish ahead of good footballing teams.


Are you taking the p*ss

Well he's right, teams can over achieve and finish higher than they should, that's what our last promotion team did, it's what Leicester are doing right now.


OLLIE KEARNS
Member
Posts: 436
Joined: 23 May 2008 10:30
Location: East Berks

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by OLLIE KEARNS » 25 Feb 2016 11:06

tidus_mi2
Longhorn1970
Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.
Bad teams don't win titles but efficient teams can finish ahead of good footballing teams.


Are you taking the p*ss

Well he's right, teams can over achieve and finish higher than they should, that's what our last promotion team did, it's what Leicester are doing right now.


Leicester aren't over achieving, they are the best team to this point of the season. Have you watched them play ? You could argue that their scouts have over achieved in bringing the likes of Vardy, Mahrez and Kante to the club but the players are performing to their level of ability. You could also say that Leicester are over achieving in relation to their history and the perception that they are not a big club. The team however is simply playing to its very high level of ability.

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Maneki Neko » 25 Feb 2016 11:34

tidus_mi2
Longhorn1970
Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.
Bad teams don't win titles but efficient teams can finish ahead of good footballing teams.


Are you taking the p*ss

Well he's right, teams can over achieve and finish higher than they should, that's what our last promotion team did, .


they 'over' achieved by being the best team.

no one was better than us. they may have had better players on paper, or a more experienced manager, but that doesn't make them a better team.
clearly

No Fixed Abode

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by No Fixed Abode » 25 Feb 2016 11:52

Extended-Phenotype
genome Can't quite figure out why some are still moaning, did we not win :?:


Apparently it matters to kes if we 'only' beat Rotheram by 'only' one goal, rather than the 3 points completely contradicting himself that points are all that matter when comparing Clarke and Brian! 

Loolz, he's a confused wee lad.‎


You're saying Reading have improved under McDermott - I proved you wrong with points per game for Clarke and Brian. So if you can't prove it that way then prove it by 'good' performances and promising football. But you can't do that either as by all accounts most games have been dire to watch in general (apart from the FA Cup games). And the most entertaining football this season? Well, that was when Clarke was in charge.

User avatar
Winston Smith
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5219
Joined: 06 Aug 2014 16:09
Location: Ministry of Truth

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Winston Smith » 25 Feb 2016 11:55

Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.


actual real life LOL :lol:


No Fixed Abode

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by No Fixed Abode » 25 Feb 2016 11:55

Longhorn1970
Nameless I think those with even a fairly basic knowledge know that it is often not the best team that wins the league. Both Saints and West Ham were better than us when we won the league but we got more points.
Bad teams don't win titles but efficient teams can finish ahead of good footballing teams.


Are you taking the p*ss


Yep. Over the course of the season the best team always wins the title.

I think some like Nameless and EP are getting confused between the best team and the most entertaining team.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5981
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Extended-Phenotype » 25 Feb 2016 13:46

No Fixed Abode
Extended-Phenotype
genome Can't quite figure out why some are still moaning, did we not win :?:


Apparently it matters to kes if we 'only' beat Rotheram by 'only' one goal, rather than the 3 points completely contradicting himself that points are all that matter when comparing Clarke and Brian! 

Loolz, he's a confused wee lad.‎


You're saying Reading have improved under McDermott - I proved you wrong with points per game for Clarke and Brian. So if you can't prove it that way then prove it by 'good' performances and promising football. But you can't do that either as by all accounts most games have been dire to watch in general (apart from the FA Cup games). And the most entertaining football this season? Well, that was when Clarke was in charge.


I get it m8, you are saying that we haven’t improved because of PPG. I’m saying that doesn’t paint the complete picture.
 
As mentioned, what I think has improved under Brian is the following:
 
1)      We are starting to concede less goals
2)      We are looking tighter as a team
3)      Players are playing with more confidence
4)      We have managed to come from behind in games, indicative of better team spirit
 
FTR, I wasn’t a basher of Clarke during his tenure and have no reason to be looking for something that isn’t there. And I wouldn’t have supported his sacking based on results or performance. But Brian is here now and after a bit of time getting up to speed with the players we look like we are showing signs of improvement, which you’d expect to translate more effectively into performance and points as we go forward.
 
Merely looking at PPG you are missing a lot of information which is why we are drawing different conclusions. And comparing two differently sized ranges in Clarkes games vs McDermotts games is disingenuous as it doesn’t account for current form, direction of progress or ambiguity of short ranges.
 
It’s okay if you don’t understand.
 
But seeing as you moan about Chelsea being the better team in a game they lost, you do seem to agree with me that points aren’t the whole story when assessing a team.
 
And seeing as you insist Liverpool have no right to expect to be in the champions league etc just because they used to be good, you do seem to agree current form is more important than judging the entire range.
 
And seeing as you rib Liverpool fans for judging their team on past glory rather than current level, you do seem to agree the size of a range (Liverpools entire history vs Liverpool this decade) can affect the conclusions you make.
 
So I can happily conclude that you agree with me on each point, even if you don’t appear to understand why.

8)

No Fixed Abode

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by No Fixed Abode » 25 Feb 2016 13:48

But still only 2 wins in 10 games.

That's confidence for you. :lol:

And as Bill Shankley once said "- “Football is a simple game, complicated by idiots,” Seems to sum EP nicely.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5981
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Extended-Phenotype » 25 Feb 2016 13:56

No Fixed Abode But still only 2 wins in 10 games.



But like you agree, it doesn't paint the whole picture

So, cool beans

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26477
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by genome » 25 Feb 2016 14:02

No Fixed Abode But still only 2 wins in 10 games.

That's confidence for you. :lol:

And as Bill Shankley once said "- “Football is a simple game, complicated by idiots,” Seems to sum EP nicely.


5 wins in 12 actually.

Do cup games not count? I thought they would have considering Chelsea's season, much like Reading's, is only really alive because of them.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26477
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by genome » 25 Feb 2016 14:02

No Fixed Abode And as Bill Shankley once said "- “Football is a simple game, complicated by idiots,” Seems to sum EP nicely.


You know you've lost an argument when you start getting personal.

User avatar
Maneki Neko
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30200
Joined: 06 Jul 2015 00:19
Location: JAPAN! fcuk you all.

Re: How impressed are you with BMcD's return to the club?

by Maneki Neko » 25 Feb 2016 14:03

only 2 losses in 12 too...


and that's after losing our top two scorers

2058 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 248 guests

It is currently 06 Aug 2025 18:10