What an odd post. Would you value the Crawley Town attacking midfield at £8 million then?Jagermesiter1871 wrote:£7mil for a 23 year old English attacking midfielder? That's oxf*rd all in today's market.
No.John Smith wrote:Anybody think we miss George Evans?
What an odd post. Would you value the Barton Rovers u11 attacking midfield at £28million then?John Smith wrote:What an odd post. Would you value the Crawley Town attacking midfield at £8 million then?Jagermesiter1871 wrote:£7mil for a 23 year old English attacking midfielder? That's oxf*rd all in today's market.
Absolutely not, which is why your initial post was absolute drivel. As per.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:What an odd post. Would you value the Barton Rovers u11 attacking midfielder at £28million then?John Smith wrote:What an odd post. Would you value the Crawley Town attacking midfield at £8 million then?Jagermesiter1871 wrote:£7mil for a 23 year old English attacking midfielder? That's oxf*rd all in today's market.
What does the Crawley Town midfield have to do with anything?John Smith wrote:Absolutely not, which is why your initial post was absolute drivel. As per.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:What an odd post. Would you value the Barton Rovers u11 attacking midfielder at £28million then?John Smith wrote: What an odd post. Would you value the Crawley Town attacking midfield at £8 million then?
Agreed, still think I'd accept an offer of £7 million, but people are acting strangely over the top over it, it's probably what he is worth in today's marketJagermesiter1871 wrote:What does the Crawley Town midfield have to do with anything?John Smith wrote:Absolutely not, which is why your initial post was absolute drivel. As per.Jagermesiter1871 wrote:
What an odd post. Would you value the Barton Rovers u11 attacking midfielder at £28million then?
The actual point at hand is Swift is a young English and former England youth International midfielder playing in the championship. You have players such as Sam Clucas, George Saville, Bobby Reid, josh Murphy and more who are older and about as proven and all whom have moved for more than £7million. Lewis Grabban went for not much short of £7million at 30 years old and that's not even mentioning our own Aluko. £7millon is little more than pittance these days.
Precisely this. You could certainly make a case for accepting it and, depending on if it meant we retained some loanees we wouldn't otherwise, I probably would. But to make out its some outlandish over the top offer we should snap their hands off for, I'd disagree. And knowing our history of spending we're just as likely to spend that 7million on someone half as good as swift and twice his age.URZZZZ wrote:Agreed, still think I'd accept an offer of £7 million, but people are acting strangely over the top over it, it's probably what he is worth in today's marketJagermesiter1871 wrote:What does the Crawley Town midfield have to do with anything?John Smith wrote: Absolutely not, which is why your initial post was absolute drivel. As per.
The actual point at hand is Swift is a young English and former England youth International midfielder playing in the championship. You have players such as Sam Clucas, George Saville, Bobby Reid, josh Murphy and more who are older and about as proven and all whom have moved for more than £7million. Lewis Grabban went for not much short of £7million at 30 years old and that's not even mentioning our own Aluko. £7millon is little more than pittance these days.
Which one.Hendo wrote: Consistent player? Not since his injury
Ok, so is RFC's problem with FFP solely down to the combination of a number of high player wages and low gate revenue or does it also cover transfer fees? I had figured that the sale to the the siblings got the debt off our books so I cannot understand if FFP also covers transfer fees. A simple explanation would be much appreciated.strap wrote:I saw that! Kind of sorts out our FFP issues for next season at a guess.Snowflake Royal wrote:That's nice, thanks.Royality creeps In wrote:
You know that people think you talk a load of shite.
Well I actually felt sorry for you.
I have now realised that they were right.
£7m? oxf*rd driving, I'll carry him there.
It covers income vs spending and is to prevent excessive losses, so yeah it covers transfer fees.PremAddict wrote:Ok, so is RFC's problem with FFP solely down to the combination of a number of high player wages and low gate revenue or does it also cover transfer fees? I had figured that the sale to the the siblings got the debt off our books so I cannot understand if FFP also covers transfer fees. A simple explanation would be much appreciated.strap wrote:I saw that! Kind of sorts out our FFP issues for next season at a guess.Snowflake Royal wrote: That's nice, thanks.
£7m? oxf*rd driving, I'll carry him there.
We didn’t destroy Edwards contract, we’ll have paid it up so it’s cost us the same as if he stayed. That’s how acontract works.linkenholtroyal wrote:We all worry about FFP but Ilori and Bacunas sale must have helped and I would hope that atleast half of the percentacge of wage we are paying our loanees is also being covered by the player we are loaning out and the destruction of the contract of David Edwards. we also have removed a descent earner at the beginning of the season in Quinn. Yes there is some dead weight still to remove and we will also lose another large earner in Mcshane. We will offload some of the dead weight aswell expect to see Meyler, Aluko and potentially another one of our better players sold like Swift to help fund things. (personally hope it is not swift as i would love to see a season with Baker, Rinhomota and swift play together there is a good mix there )
I don't think things are that bad but we need to be wary of FFP. I think we may see some experienced but in expensive free transfers come in. the likes of Beevers from Bolton springs to mind, Knudson and Spence aswell from Ipswich. They are not bad players just in terrible sides and not on massive contracts. I can also see a couple of loans coming in the same. Might see Miazga on a full season and Ejaria. could see us buying Oliveira and Baker with the pennys we do have and a Goalkeeper (Would love Martinez and would also take Martinez on a season long but unlikely.)
What I really dont want though is wholesale changes in the core as we have a good feeling again and a good feeling amongst the squad that needs to be kept going into next season.
His first oneLower West wrote:Which one.Hendo wrote: Consistent player? Not since his injury
I'd be happy for Baker to stay.
I remember reading somewhere it was a mutual split so Edwards could go to Shrewsbury and play on a longer contract. don't know the ins and outs but I don't think we payed it up. It does still happen. I maybe wrong though.Nameless wrote:We didn’t destroy Edwards contract, we’ll have paid it up so it’s cost us the same as if he stayed. That’s how acontract works.linkenholtroyal wrote:We all worry about FFP but Ilori and Bacunas sale must have helped and I would hope that atleast half of the percentacge of wage we are paying our loanees is also being covered by the player we are loaning out and the destruction of the contract of David Edwards. we also have removed a descent earner at the beginning of the season in Quinn. Yes there is some dead weight still to remove and we will also lose another large earner in Mcshane. We will offload some of the dead weight aswell expect to see Meyler, Aluko and potentially another one of our better players sold like Swift to help fund things. (personally hope it is not swift as i would love to see a season with Baker, Rinhomota and swift play together there is a good mix there )
I don't think things are that bad but we need to be wary of FFP. I think we may see some experienced but in expensive free transfers come in. the likes of Beevers from Bolton springs to mind, Knudson and Spence aswell from Ipswich. They are not bad players just in terrible sides and not on massive contracts. I can also see a couple of loans coming in the same. Might see Miazga on a full season and Ejaria. could see us buying Oliveira and Baker with the pennys we do have and a Goalkeeper (Would love Martinez and would also take Martinez on a season long but unlikely.)
What I really dont want though is wholesale changes in the core as we have a good feeling again and a good feeling amongst the squad that needs to be kept going into next season.
We know for the loan players who came in we are paying very little. Seems like some massive favours have been done and it will be interesting to see how they are repaid. I would imagine we will be using one specific agent for our recruitment for the foreseeable future. We are likely to be paying more towards the cost of the players who are out on loan than on the ones we have here.
I would hope we have dealt with the FFP issue and we won’t be impacted by it next season but I also think our spending will be much reduced. You’d hope we got a good price agreed as part of Nelson’s loan deal, to be honest with Norwich eyeing Premiership riches there’s no reason they will have asked daft moneyfor a player they clearly don’t want.
Or you can also potentially sell a player you don’t want to Another club the owners own in let’s say China. To put some money back into the club. And then you don’t have to pay his wage or give him away for nothing.PremAddict wrote:Thanks for all the additional information. So do clubs really benefit form deep-pocketed owners anymore or are there ways around FFP such as owners paying fee directly as “gifts”?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests