by Denver Royal »
16 Apr 2019 13:12
16 Apr 2019 13:12
Stranded wrote:He is absolutely replaceable - he is a decent Championship level attacking midfielder - there are plenty of others out there. If we can get good money and get a like-for-like player in (ideally a hidden gem with more ability/consistancy) then I'm happy with him leaving this summer.
Agree he's replaceable (most all our players are, more or less).
There are 'plenty of others out there'? Interesting you say that, because about a month ago I asked people to start naming them all, and I haven't heard one name yet. (Aside from Eja, maybe, who I'd be unsure of in that role).
Obv it's not our job in here to scout and identify replacements for the club. But usually there are a few names banded about in here, esp if there are plenty of others out there.
Obv 'sell to buy' is a factor in improving the team, and I see that. But still interesting that some don't rate Swift, yet at same time say he's our most salable asset/for the most money. How is his valuation arrived at then?
Someone claimed we shouldn't sell Moore (like some wanted last Summer) cos it would send the wrong message to the loanees and they won't come here if we get rid of our best players beforehand. Does this not apply to Swift?
Btw, if there are 'plenty out there', why would Leeds be keying on Swift (if they are)? Because they think he's a really good player who will get even better? Looks like they will be in PL (as I predicted in Aug). Is Swift a PL player?
As I said, I'm all for upgrading positions, and if we get someone in to replace him and do what he does, but only better, then fine by me. (Presumably that player won't cost much, otherwise it would defeat the purpose somewhat).