by NewCorkSeth » 31 Jul 2019 14:13
by PistolPete » 31 Jul 2019 15:35
NewCorkSeth wrote:Wages. Also I would prefer to sign a deeper midfielder not another box to box mid. Rinomhota has all the attributes to be a great b2b mid and we should be looking to develop that rather than limiting him to a deeper role.
by Mid Sussex Royal » 31 Jul 2019 19:11
John Smith wrote:In a heartbeat.
Categorically the best midfielder to have ever played for us.
by Snowflake Royal » 31 Jul 2019 19:54
PistolPete wrote:NewCorkSeth wrote:Wages. Also I would prefer to sign a deeper midfielder not another box to box mid. Rinomhota has all the attributes to be a great b2b mid and we should be looking to develop that rather than limiting him to a deeper role.
This ^
by One87One » 31 Jul 2019 19:58
One87One wrote:Never going to happen.
He’s a massive wage and we’re busy removing those as best we can. We certainly wouldn’t be adding them to the wage bill, especially those that are rarely fit!
Move on.
by NewCorkSeth » 31 Jul 2019 20:36
Snowflake Royal wrote:PistolPete wrote:NewCorkSeth wrote:Wages. Also I would prefer to sign a deeper midfielder not another box to box mid. Rinomhota has all the attributes to be a great b2b mid and we should be looking to develop that rather than limiting him to a deeper role.
This ^
I'd prefer two solid b2bers than 1 deep and 1 b2b. But then I hate seeing a midfielder basically playing half their game as a third CB, it's just the way we play.
by Nameless » 31 Jul 2019 20:48
NewCorkSeth wrote:Snowflake Royal wrote:PistolPete wrote:
This ^
I'd prefer two solid b2bers than 1 deep and 1 b2b. But then I hate seeing a midfielder basically playing half their game as a third CB, it's just the way we play.
Oooh that's risky. Cant say I've seen any team play a 2 man midfield with 2 b2bs before.
I mean Baker did it (played deep) last year and still got forward enough to threaten.
by Hound » 31 Jul 2019 20:59
One87One wrote:Never going to happen.
He’s a massive wage and we’re busy removing those as best we can. We certainly wouldn’t be adding them to the wage bill, especially those that are rarely fit!
Move on.
by Nameless » 31 Jul 2019 21:07
StellaPlease wrote:Why is this stupid, hypothetical thread still running?
by Ascotexgunner » 31 Jul 2019 21:50
Users browsing this forum: retro royal and 168 guests