oofThe Enfield Royal71 wrote:To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
that's gotta hurt
oofThe Enfield Royal71 wrote:To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
Hound wrote:What's wrong with it is justifying the opinion with comments like 'no danger of it going in', 'keeper wasn't worried' and 'it went over' (it didn't)Stranded wrote:So just to clarify, most are of the belief that Swift's free kick was unlucky and worth a go but URZZZ thinks that it may have been a better option to play the ball in so that it could be contested? Both pretty valid views especially as Swift didn't score.
The rest of most of the last two pages have then essentially been willy waving?
None of which are really valid.
It is this week's Miazga 3 game ban pointless argument though. Actually thought the free kicks overall were a good mix this week, even if none were actually executed quite right. Some shots, some high crosses, some low pull backs. Good to see us keeping them guessing, though some ended in a shambles.
Tbf he's barely played all season. Blackett has proven himself a reliable, professional squad player at this level, though admittedly he will never be a star at this level.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:We were doing well.
Then Blackett came on.
It’s the fireworks upsetting meZip wrote:Hound wrote:What's wrong with it is justifying the opinion with comments like 'no danger of it going in', 'keeper wasn't worried' and 'it went over' (it didn't)Stranded wrote:So just to clarify, most are of the belief that Swift's free kick was unlucky and worth a go but URZZZ thinks that it may have been a better option to play the ball in so that it could be contested? Both pretty valid views especially as Swift didn't score.
The rest of most of the last two pages have then essentially been willy waving?
None of which are really valid.
It is this week's Miazga 3 game ban pointless argument though. Actually thought the free kicks overall were a good mix this week, even if none were actually executed quite right. Some shots, some high crosses, some low pull backs. Good to see us keeping them guessing, though some ended in a shambles.
You’ve gone from a Hound to a pit bull recently.
S'alright. It'll be genome and me again in a minute. Or OMA and JS. Or platy. You get the point.Maneki Neko wrote:oofThe Enfield Royal71 wrote:To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
that's gotta hurt
Another decent crosser of the ball. Could relieve some of the work rate off Obita pushing forward.2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:We were doing well.
Then Blackett came on.
Could end up being all of us in one swoop.Snowflake Royal wrote:S'alright. It'll be genome and me again in a minute. Or OMA and JS. Or platy. You get the point.Maneki Neko wrote:oofThe Enfield Royal71 wrote:To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
that's gotta hurt
Considering he posted the exact same message last week, no it doesn’t. And considering he messaged me asking me to unblock him and he’ll stop being an idiot, I’m not sure what his problem is. It’s just a shame I still have to read his messages through other people quoting himManeki Neko wrote:oofThe Enfield Royal71 wrote:To be honest, urzzz and Denver are the worst posters on this place.
that's gotta hurt
OMA and JS could never be the x würstOld Man Andrews wrote:Could end up being all of us in one swoop.Snowflake Royal wrote:S'alright. It'll be genome and me again in a minute. Or OMA and JS. Or platy. You get the point.Maneki Neko wrote:
oof
that's gotta hurt
New spinoff thread?NewCorkSeth wrote:Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
I think you’re a oxf*rd tbfNewCorkSeth wrote:Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
Thank you. All I wanted was a little recognition.Zip wrote:I think you’re a oxf*rd tbfNewCorkSeth wrote:Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
No need.URZZZZ wrote:New spinoff thread?NewCorkSeth wrote:Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
I take that all back. You’re a decent poster young man.NewCorkSeth wrote:Thank you. All I wanted was a little recognition.Zip wrote:I think you’re a oxf*rd tbfNewCorkSeth wrote:Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
Thought Denver and Urrzzz were 1&2? You changed your mind?The Enfield Royal71 wrote:No need.URZZZZ wrote:New spinoff thread?NewCorkSeth wrote:Little upset that I am being left out of the "worst poster" competition.
1) you
2) snowflid royal
3) denver royal
4) vic meldrew
5) woodley royal
The top 5 are interchangeable between themselves.Hound wrote:Thought Denver and Urrzzz were 1&2? You changed your mind?The Enfield Royal71 wrote:No need.URZZZZ wrote:
New spinoff thread?
1) you
2) snowflid royal
3) denver royal
4) vic meldrew
5) woodley royal
....and yet you refer to him as “Snowflid Royal”.The Enfield Royal71 wrote:The top 5 are interchangeable between themselves.Hound wrote:Thought Denver and Urrzzz were 1&2? You changed your mind?The Enfield Royal71 wrote:
No need.
1) you
2) snowflid royal
3) denver royal
4) vic meldrew
5) woodley royal
Urzzz has had a mare today, and snowflake has been mocking mental health and disabled people.
Zip wrote:....and yet you refer to him as “Snowflid Royal”.The Enfield Royal71 wrote:The top 5 are interchangeable between themselves.Hound wrote:
Thought Denver and Urrzzz were 1&2? You changed your mind?
Urzzz has had a mare today, and snowflake has been mocking mental health and disabled people.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Farnham Royal, Google [Bot], RoyalBlue and 68 guests