lol. They have got us there tbfpaultheroyal wrote:If any club will feel at home and be unaffected by playing in an empty stadium with no atmosphere it’s Reading to be fair.
lol. They have got us there tbfpaultheroyal wrote:If any club will feel at home and be unaffected by playing in an empty stadium with no atmosphere it’s Reading to be fair.
Or Psucas to miss a few sitters?leon wrote:Tbf we need to bring Swift back to blaze a few randomly over to get our averages up.WestYorksRoyal wrote:On this xG thing other fans seem obsessed with, it doesn't make sense.
Looking at the stats, our expected goals and expected conceded are very close. But they're different. Our xG is made up of a lower volume of high quality chances, which our in form strikers are converting.
The xG against us is a higher volume of low quality chances, which adds up to the same. But we have a good keeper, and you wouldn't expect him to get beaten by low quality chances often.
So basically, we're creating higher quality chances which we're converting, but our rivals don't consider it sustainable.
This made me lol, we are so tinpot.paultheroyal wrote:Forest
If any club will feel at home and be unaffected by playing in an empty stadium with no atmosphere it’s Reading to be fair.
Doing brilliantly but clearly some are suffering negativity withdrawal symptoms.Hendo wrote:Or Psucas to miss a few sitters?leon wrote:Tbf we need to bring Swift back to blaze a few randomly over to get our averages up.WestYorksRoyal wrote:On this xG thing other fans seem obsessed with, it doesn't make sense.
Looking at the stats, our expected goals and expected conceded are very close. But they're different. Our xG is made up of a lower volume of high quality chances, which our in form strikers are converting.
The xG against us is a higher volume of low quality chances, which adds up to the same. But we have a good keeper, and you wouldn't expect him to get beaten by low quality chances often.
So basically, we're creating higher quality chances which we're converting, but our rivals don't consider it sustainable.
BrightonWoodleyRoyal wrote:Brighton north stand chat
I hope they fall away. No doubt some of their nobhead fans are already wondering how to reword their poncy 'record' chant.
Snowflake Royal wrote:One hundred and six
One hundred and siiiiix
Brighton got no records
One hundred and six.
Mine, and probably Leon's, comment was certainly tongue in cheekRoyalBlue wrote:Doing brilliantly but clearly some are suffering negativity withdrawal symptoms.Hendo wrote:Or Psucas to miss a few sitters?leon wrote:
Tbf we need to bring Swift back to blaze a few randomly over to get our averages up.
Swift's return will present our in form strikers with even more chances to convert and Puscas is pretty good at scoring goals when given the chances. Meite too misses sitters but scores great goals at other times.
by From Despair To Where? » 28 Oct 2020 10:07
28 Oct 2020 10:07Surely our Expected Goals is every time we take a shot, we expect to score.WestYorksRoyal wrote:On this xG thing other fans seem obsessed with, it doesn't make sense.
Looking at the stats, our expected goals and expected conceded are very close. But they're different. Our xG is made up of a lower volume of high quality chances, which our in form strikers are converting.
The xG against us is a higher volume of low quality chances, which adds up to the same. But we have a good keeper, and you wouldn't expect him to get beaten by low quality chances often.
So basically, we're creating higher quality chances which we're converting, but our rivals don't consider it sustainable.
I'd like to know who these 20 Reading fans are.WoodleyRoyal wrote:brentford
nick logan said:
if we don't finish above reading i will parade naked through the Invo
Mate, I will do it next to you. And then I will donate my house to any charity.
As I said in another thread, thank god its them and not watford, Bmouth or Norwich pushing on. Reading are irrelevant and its not a case of catching them, it is a case of letting them fade away. I know about 20 Reading fans who I see regularly when playing football or at work and they all think they have already used up their whole seasons luck, they are loving it but they know they are rubbish.
think we may need to keep tabs on this one
by From Despair To Where? » 28 Oct 2020 10:19
28 Oct 2020 10:19Pepe the Horseman wrote:I'd like to know who these 20 Reading fans are.WoodleyRoyal wrote:brentford
nick logan said:
if we don't finish above reading i will parade naked through the Invo
Mate, I will do it next to you. And then I will donate my house to any charity.
As I said in another thread, thank god its them and not watford, Bmouth or Norwich pushing on. Reading are irrelevant and its not a case of catching them, it is a case of letting them fade away. I know about 20 Reading fans who I see regularly when playing football or at work and they all think they have already used up their whole seasons luck, they are loving it but they know they are rubbish.
think we may need to keep tabs on this one
Hinton?Mr Optimist wrote:Brentford, bless! lol! Two words...Jamie
I’ll let you guess the second.
Do refs really favour Southern teams? Is that a genuine theory? I thought old Trafford was the epitome of refs being biased. Those Northern monkeys really do come up with some weird theories. #sad#jealousybcubed wrote:Thought he gave us nothing tbfJagermesiter1871 wrote:"Referees will favour the Southern team, the traditionally bigger team, the most recently PL side and the current higher placed team. In just about that order."
![]()
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], nailseabiscuitman, WestYorksRoyal and 239 guests