Nameless wrote:Can’t say the prospect of having player called Ian in the team appeals greatly.
Do you think we could drag him out of retirement we pretty much did that once before.Hendo wrote:Nameless wrote:Can’t say the prospect of having player called Ian in the team appeals greatly.
Hasn't he gone over to the darkside (become an agent) now? I mean, he could do a job for us on the pitch, but I'd be afraid he's be too busy persuading our assets to sign up with him and agitate for a move.linkenholtroyal wrote: Do you think we could drag him out of retirement we pretty much did that once before.
Maybe a double agent? Get all the players he represents to come to us?muirinho wrote:Hasn't he gone over to the darkside (become an agent) now? I mean, he could do a job for us on the pitch, but I'd be afraid he's be too busy persuading our assets to sign up with him and agitate for a move.linkenholtroyal wrote: Do you think we could drag him out of retirement we pretty much did that once before.
Passed his medicalmorganb wrote:A few days ago the reports were he was off to Coventry but hasn't been confrimed yet
Elm Park Kid wrote:Chelsea use their loanees to make money - which means we would have to cover his wage and pay a fee. Neither of which we are in a great position to do.
ConfimredRG30 wrote:Passed his medicalmorganb wrote:A few days ago the reports were he was off to Coventry but hasn't been confrimed yet
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 183 guests