by ILoveMoonPig » 05 Jul 2025 09:02
by WestYorksRoyal » 05 Jul 2025 09:27
ILoveMoonPig I'm getting the impression that life in L1 is very much a case of basically doing a yearly squad rebuild. You can't really build long term, anyone young enough and developing well will take their shot at a step up to the champ.
I'm really grateful we have a pipeline of promising youngsters coming through and I hope we keep that going. It means we have a steady stream of young talent waiting to step in.
A lot of clubs will have to get promoted the first time they start doing well, or basically lose their star players and fall away.
by Sutekh » 05 Jul 2025 09:51
WestYorksRoyalILoveMoonPig I'm getting the impression that life in L1 is very much a case of basically doing a yearly squad rebuild. You can't really build long term, anyone young enough and developing well will take their shot at a step up to the champ.
I'm really grateful we have a pipeline of promising youngsters coming through and I hope we keep that going. It means we have a steady stream of young talent waiting to step in.
A lot of clubs will have to get promoted the first time they start doing well, or basically lose their star players and fall away.
That's not really true. We've lost Craig and Wareham to rivals when they could have been good squad options, and which may not have happened if we had the ability to open contract renewal negotiations earlier last season. We lost Mbengue to QPR, but again I bet we'd have tried to renew him and Bindon last summer.
Of course the best and highest potential players will move to the Championship, but ideally it would be a maximum of 2 or 3 a season and all for good fees. Then maybe add 3 or 4 who you let go when contracts expire, but by definition they will be easier to absorb. You should never be negotiating contracts for key players upon expiry, and if they want to run it down they become one of the players you sell.
So overall, you'd expect a churn of 5 - 7 players a season, of which most are fringe players you choose to let go and the better ones bring in money. No need for a full rebuild every year.
We've been rebuilding the squad pretty much every summer apart from 2024 solely because of bad ownership.
by ILoveMoonPig » 05 Jul 2025 12:17
WestYorksRoyalILoveMoonPig I'm getting the impression that life in L1 is very much a case of basically doing a yearly squad rebuild. You can't really build long term, anyone young enough and developing well will take their shot at a step up to the champ.
I'm really grateful we have a pipeline of promising youngsters coming through and I hope we keep that going. It means we have a steady stream of young talent waiting to step in.
A lot of clubs will have to get promoted the first time they start doing well, or basically lose their star players and fall away.
That's not really true. We've lost Craig and Wareham to rivals when they could have been good squad options, and which may not have happened if we had the ability to open contract renewal negotiations earlier last season. We lost Mbengue to QPR, but again I bet we'd have tried to renew him and Bindon last summer.
Of course the best and highest potential players will move to the Championship, but ideally it would be a maximum of 2 or 3 a season and all for good fees. Then maybe add 3 or 4 who you let go when contracts expire, but by definition they will be easier to absorb. You should never be negotiating contracts for key players upon expiry, and if they want to run it down they become one of the players you sell.
So overall, you'd expect a churn of 5 - 7 players a season, of which most are fringe players you choose to let go and the better ones bring in money. No need for a full rebuild every year.
We've been rebuilding the squad pretty much every summer apart from 2024 solely because of bad ownership.
by Uke » 06 Jul 2025 13:09
WestYorksRoyal That's not really true. We've lost Craig and Wareham to rivals when they could have been good squad options
by tidus_mi2 » 06 Jul 2025 15:36
UkeWestYorksRoyal That's not really true. We've lost Craig and Wareham to rivals when they could have been good squad options
Which is precisely what they didn’t want to be.
So they left at the end of their contract.
That’s not us “losing” them.
by 72 bus » 06 Jul 2025 20:53
tidus_mi2UkeWestYorksRoyal That's not really true. We've lost Craig and Wareham to rivals when they could have been good squad options
Which is precisely what they didn’t want to be.
So they left at the end of their contract.
That’s not us “losing” them.
Yeah, that's how I see it as well. Whatever the situation and perhaps it's arrogance on my part, but if we were offering the same as Exeter or Lincoln and we should be easily able to do that, they both would have stayed. Sounds like a common sense approach really.
by tidus_mi2 » 07 Jul 2025 10:47
72 bustidus_mi2Uke
Which is precisely what they didn’t want to be.
So they left at the end of their contract.
That’s not us “losing” them.
Yeah, that's how I see it as well. Whatever the situation and perhaps it's arrogance on my part, but if we were offering the same as Exeter or Lincoln and we should be easily able to do that, they both would have stayed. Sounds like a common sense approach really.
Craig left because without injuries to midfield and right back he would not get a game, and he does not want to play right back.
Yiadom has the right back position whilst fit backed up by abreafa, Savage Wing and Elliot plus Knibbs would block him in midfield, and we have a shed load of midfielders in the academy that can fill in for a game or two.
by WestYorksRoyal » 07 Jul 2025 11:08
tidus_mi272 bustidus_mi2 Yeah, that's how I see it as well. Whatever the situation and perhaps it's arrogance on my part, but if we were offering the same as Exeter or Lincoln and we should be easily able to do that, they both would have stayed. Sounds like a common sense approach really.
Craig left because without injuries to midfield and right back he would not get a game, and he does not want to play right back.
Yiadom has the right back position whilst fit backed up by abreafa, Savage Wing and Elliot plus Knibbs would block him in midfield, and we have a shed load of midfielders in the academy that can fill in for a game or two.
He doesn't want to play RB but signed for a club that announced him as a RB?
by tidus_mi2 » 07 Jul 2025 15:07
by Brogue » 07 Jul 2025 15:34
tidus_mi2 Has Kelvin not signed yet because Couhig said he was improving the Wifi at the Stadium and he took it as an insult?
by Sutekh » 07 Jul 2025 16:04
Broguetidus_mi2 Has Kelvin not signed yet because Couhig said he was improving the Wifi at the Stadium and he took it as an insult?
he hasn't signed yet because his agent is being a pcunt. He wants to sign...
by Hound » 07 Jul 2025 17:09
Broguetidus_mi2 Has Kelvin not signed yet because Couhig said he was improving the Wifi at the Stadium and he took it as an insult?
he hasn't signed yet because his agent is being a pcunt. He wants to sign...
by Pepe the Horseman » 07 Jul 2025 17:13
by Hound » 07 Jul 2025 17:21
Pepe the Horseman Happy days. Just two wingers away from a starting XI. Would also like to sign a big lump of a centre forward as plan B.
by windermereROYAL » 07 Jul 2025 17:30
by Sutekh » 07 Jul 2025 18:21
by Sutekh » 07 Jul 2025 18:30
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], From Despair To Where?, KDRF, Reading_fc_bible, Sutekh, WestYorksRoyal and 165 guests