The generic transfer thread

[Winston Biscuit]

£85m Matues Fernandes from West Ham to Spurs. I believe that is the guaranteed amount too, before add ons. Insane money for a relegated player. The market has gone mad.

Absolutely nuts. Lets hope he can make it 3 relegations in 3 seasons

[BRO_BOT]

£85m Matues Fernandes from West Ham to Spurs. I believe that is the guaranteed amount too, before add ons. Insane money for a relegated player. The market has gone mad.

Absolutely nuts. Lets hope he can make it 3 relegations in 3 seasons

Way too much, but maybe that's the market!

I can understand why Spurs have paid it though.

[genome]

About time Spurs started acting like a big club and just getting the transfers done rather than haggling and ending up with a £50m average player after panicking late in the window

Isn't that the criticism that always gets thrown at them, and they think they are a big club but don't act like it?

[6ft Kerplunk]

£85m Matues Fernandes from West Ham to Spurs. I believe that is the guaranteed amount too, before add ons. Insane money for a relegated player. The market has gone mad.

Absolutely nuts. Lets hope he can make it 3 relegations in 3 seasons

Way too much, but maybe that's the market!

I can understand why Spurs have paid it though.

But with West Ham being desperate to bring money in you wouldn't just pay you'd wait until they get really desperate and will take £65m with the rest in add ons for achieving success like finishing more than one place above the relegation zone.

[BRO_BOT]

Absolutely nuts. Lets hope he can make it 3 relegations in 3 seasons

Way too much, but maybe that's the market!

I can understand why Spurs have paid it though.

But with West Ham being desperate to bring money in you wouldn't just pay you'd wait until they get really desperate and will take £65m with the rest in add ons for achieving success like finishing more than one place above the relegation zone.

Spurs can't oxf*rd around. They came extremely close to being relegated.

Man Utd were leading the race for him, and they were adopting that tactic. If Spurs had waited, they wouldn't have got him. They really need to reinforce. Getting a marquee signing early door shows they mean business and helps attract other players (as well as get their own fans to chillax)

[6ft Kerplunk]

Can't say he's ever made that much of an impression on me. He must be better than two consecutive relegations but has he really increased his value by £40M in one season?

[South Coast Royal]

Can't say he's ever made that much of an impression on me. He must be better than two consecutive relegations but has he really increased his value by £40M in one season?

West ham must be laughing all the way to the bank.
I could see Summerville or Bowen commanding a fee nearer that amount but he hasn't IMHO shown enough even if he does have age on his side and could improve.

BTW if those other two leave I can't see West Ham being good enough to make an immediate promotion challenge.

[Winston Biscuit]

Spurs reportedly offer £90M basic + add ons for Tonali

[genome]

There will be fees in for Spurs too. Vuskovic to Brighton for £50m apparently. Assuming Romero will also go for a sizeable chunk to one of your Barcelonas or your Atletico Madrids or your Real Madrids or your PSGs

[Sanguine]

There will be fees in for Spurs too. Vuskovic to Brighton for £50m apparently. Assuming Romero will also go for a sizeable chunk to one of your Barcelonas or your Atletico Madrids or your Real Madrids or your PSGs

And Micky Van de Ven.

[genome]

There will be fees in for Spurs too. Vuskovic to Brighton for £50m apparently. Assuming Romero will also go for a sizeable chunk to one of your Barcelonas or your Atletico Madrids or your Real Madrids or your PSGs

And Micky Van de Ven.

He'll stay I think unless something crazy comes in. Seems to love De Zerbi, and Van Hecke is his best mate apparently.

[Winston Biscuit]

There will be fees in for Spurs too. Vuskovic to Brighton for £50m apparently. Assuming Romero will also go for a sizeable chunk to one of your Barcelonas or your Atletico Madrids or your Real Madrids or your PSGs

If Romero doesn't end up at Atletico it will feel like something has gone drastically wrong in the space-time continuum

[Winston Biscuit]

Spurs reportedly offer £90M basic + add ons for Tonali

Now reported the deal is agreed at £100M

[windermereROYAL]

Christ they`re really going for it aren`t they.

[Sutekh]

Christ they`re really going for it aren`t they.

Yes mid table obscurity should be within their grasp at last.

[Winston Biscuit]

Spurs Spending explained with regards to new SCR rules:

Tottenham can spend significant sums because under the new squad-cost ratio rules (SCR) they are allowed to spend up to 85% of their revenue on player costs - player wages, amortisation and agent fees etc.

In their last set of accounts (2024-25), wages and amortisation was only 61%, and this includes all salaries. Clubs do not separate between playing and non-playing staff, although Uefa says that normally about 75% of total wage costs go towards a club's first team.

In addition, Tottenham's new stadium, which can now host up to 30 non-football events a year at full capacity, is proving to be very beneficial.

At their old White Hart Lane ground, annual matchday revenue was £45m and commercial income - which includes concerts and NFL games - was £73m.

At the new stadium those figures were £126m and £277m, respectively, in 2024-25. The additional money coming into the club allows it to spend more under the SCR regime.

While the club has spent a lot of money this summer to date, transfer fees are amortised over the length of the contract, but limited to five years, so a £240m spend this summer equates to a £48m amortisation fee.

Tottenham's total revenue for 2024-25 was £565m. Under SCR rules they would be able to spend up to £480m a year on their squad.

[Sutekh]

What’s it like if Spurs win a trophy? Worried in case there could be damage to the space/time continuum.

[Winston Biscuit]

I am not great with the whole financial regulations, but being able to spend roughly £480M per season sounds miles above what they were allowed to spend under PSR rules.

I do get that its a 'reward' for pushing their revenues so high. but £480M sounds crazy. unless I am remembering wrong.

Makes me think SCR could be the thing that pushes Spurs into being a team fighting for the top few spots in the league.

I would like to see a list of PL clubs and how much SCR would previously allowed them to spend per season.

[Winston Biscuit]

Just asked AI for a list of all PL clubs and what their permitted spending would have been last season had SCR been brought in a year earlier than it is

SCR.png (102.25 KiB) Viewed 447 times

crikey

[Whore Jackie]

Spurs Spending explained with regards to new SCR rules:

Tottenham can spend significant sums because under the new squad-cost ratio rules (SCR) they are allowed to spend up to 85% of their revenue on player costs - player wages, amortisation and agent fees etc.

In their last set of accounts (2024-25), wages and amortisation was only 61%, and this includes all salaries. Clubs do not separate between playing and non-playing staff, although Uefa says that normally about 75% of total wage costs go towards a club's first team.

In addition, Tottenham's new stadium, which can now host up to 30 non-football events a year at full capacity, is proving to be very beneficial.

At their old White Hart Lane ground, annual matchday revenue was £45m and commercial income - which includes concerts and NFL games - was £73m.

At the new stadium those figures were £126m and £277m, respectively, in 2024-25. The additional money coming into the club allows it to spend more under the SCR regime.

While the club has spent a lot of money this summer to date, transfer fees are amortised over the length of the contract, but limited to five years, so a £240m spend this summer equates to a £48m amortisation fee.

Tottenham's total revenue for 2024-25 was £565m. Under SCR rules they would be able to spend up to £480m a year on their squad.

Interesting*. Presumably that's why Liverpool have an annual summer series of concerts now. Zach Bryan, Foo Fighters and My Chemical Romance this year. Springsteen, Dua Lipa and Lana Del Rey in 2025.