
Exactly this. I realy don't know what some were expecting.Jano wrote:Really am amazed at the negativity on this one, it's about the best signing we could have hoped or dreamt for. We have no money, and we've signed an experienced, natural goalscorer who looks in decent shape and potentially has a few years left in him on a short term deal for a free transfer. I can't imagine the club will have given him a big wage as they will have been bitten on the Ferdinand deal. Add to that he is perfectly capable of the spectacular as well as the simple tap ins, he could be just what the club needs to further improve morale in the squad as he seems to come across as a very upbeat character and surely it'll give the crowd a lift on match days.

but he does have a polynym he has chosen to be mononymousSCIAG wrote:Expecting to be dodded but when was the last time (if ever) that we had a player who was all but mononymous?
Well yes, and I acknowledged that ("all but"), but that's not the point I was making.WoodleyRoyal wrote:but he does have a polynym he has chosen to be mononymousSCIAG wrote:Expecting to be dodded but when was the last time (if ever) that we had a player who was all but mononymous?
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], RG30 and 842 guests