by Hound » 23 Feb 2019 18:51
23 Feb 2019 18:51by Ascotexgunner » 23 Feb 2019 18:51
23 Feb 2019 18:51by Old Man Andrews » 23 Feb 2019 18:57
23 Feb 2019 18:57by windermereROYAL » 23 Feb 2019 19:00
23 Feb 2019 19:00by Royal_jimmy » 23 Feb 2019 19:02
23 Feb 2019 19:02by sandman » 23 Feb 2019 19:04
23 Feb 2019 19:04FFSSCIAG wrote:Don't remember us getting into trouble from playing it out from the back today. I do remember us scoring a goal after playing it out from the back.Bristol Paul wrote:Rotherham tried hard, ran hard, but lacking quality. Our players think they are better than they are, Swift can’t tackle and is definitely not as good as he thinks he is. Moore is another, negative, poor touch and wish we’d sold him when we had the chance. Why do we persevere with getting into so much trouble from playing it out form the back, and we don’t play with any tempo whatsoever. If there was any doubt it would go down to the last day, there shouldn’t be now, we are so so poor and have no fight for the challenge in my view.
Honestly the negative here is completely baffling. Yes the sub was weird and the two dropped points are disappointing but we played really well. Every single player eho started can hold their head up high after that performance. Play like that every week and we'll be fine.
by CountryRoyal » 23 Feb 2019 19:06
23 Feb 2019 19:06by NewCorkSeth » 23 Feb 2019 19:15
23 Feb 2019 19:15Where are you in France? Why didn't you come visit me? We could have made a day of it.CountryRoyal wrote:I watched on ifollow as I’m in France. oxf*rd me we are shit. Meite was gash and so was Oliveira god knows how he missed that. Thought the Liverpool lad offered the most quality and certainly stood out but probably easy to do with the other shite. It’s depressing watching Gmac now compared to what he once offered.
It’s weird it always looks like we are playing within ourselves and it looks like we never really “go for it”, in reality we are just not a good team, we’re devoid of quality, creativity and commitment.
by Hound » 23 Feb 2019 19:19
23 Feb 2019 19:19Yep it’s an odd one. We really did ‘go for it’ between 85-90mins and were excellent. So why only do it then?CountryRoyal wrote:
It’s weird it always looks like we are playing within ourselves and it looks like we never really “go for it”.
by Notts Royal » 23 Feb 2019 19:20
23 Feb 2019 19:20Genuinely believe Clement would’ve kept us up. He needed more than 1 transfer window. The bloke was shafted by the club.Ascotexgunner wrote:Rotherham have had goals in them the last couple of months. They take their chances . We don't.
Really mystified by the subs, seemed to drop very deep and that was our downfall. I'd still rather have Gomes than Clement but Jesus Christ this team ware shocking. Whether we survive or not 70% of this team can f*ck off at the end of the season, never want to see them in a Reading shirt again.
I'm starting to wonder whether Gomes has the balls to make positive gambles when it matters and would rather defend slender leads when we really should be more positive.
by Lower West » 23 Feb 2019 19:22
23 Feb 2019 19:22If we put half their team into ours. We'd be comfortably mid table.Bristol Paul wrote:Rotherham tried hard, ran hard, but lacking quality.
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Feb 2019 19:24
23 Feb 2019 19:24Because the defenders and midfielders are frequently more interested in playing triangles in our half and dawdling in their passing, sadly.Hound wrote:My main concern is still the lack of chance creation
GMac played well but had so little of the ball. Meite didn’t do enough for me
We’re not getting the ball out fast enough to the wingers. When we do we create chances
by SCIAG » 23 Feb 2019 19:24
23 Feb 2019 19:24We've used that phrase about every third match because it's true - every three matches or so we play really well, and today was one such example. We need to add the consistency.sandman wrote:FFSSCIAG wrote:Don't remember us getting into trouble from playing it out from the back today. I do remember us scoring a goal after playing it out from the back.Bristol Paul wrote:Rotherham tried hard, ran hard, but lacking quality. Our players think they are better than they are, Swift can’t tackle and is definitely not as good as he thinks he is. Moore is another, negative, poor touch and wish we’d sold him when we had the chance. Why do we persevere with getting into so much trouble from playing it out form the back, and we don’t play with any tempo whatsoever. If there was any doubt it would go down to the last day, there shouldn’t be now, we are so so poor and have no fight for the challenge in my view.
Honestly the negative here is completely baffling. Yes the sub was weird and the two dropped points are disappointing but we played really well. Every single player eho started can hold their head up high after that performance. Play like that every week and we'll be fine.
The phrase we've been saying since the 3rd of August.
The goal came about from getting the ball out wide and using some pace, not because of passing around the back, the passing just came along with it.
We then didn't bother getting it out wide with pace until just after Rotherham scored and then managed to get three chances that we should have done better with.
by Lower West » 23 Feb 2019 19:25
23 Feb 2019 19:25Rotherham did work hard the entire match. Also were pushing for the win. Could easily have kept more players back.Hound wrote:Yep it’s an odd one. We really did ‘go for it’ between 85-90mins and were excellent. So why only do it then?CountryRoyal wrote:
It’s weird it always looks like we are playing within ourselves and it looks like we never really “go for it”.
by Kitsondinho » 23 Feb 2019 19:29
23 Feb 2019 19:29This. We have lots of quality in the squad.....but very little fight or desire. We are in this mess because we don’t do the simple stuff and we always allow teams back into the game when we take the lead. This could easily have happened against Blackburn.....Nelson saved our blushes.Lower West wrote:If we put half their team into ours. We'd be comfortably mid table.Bristol Paul wrote:Rotherham tried hard, ran hard, but lacking quality.![]()
Quality players alone don't make a team. Other ingredients come into play.
I'd back Rotherham to stay up above us. More likely to scrape points together away from home.
by Lower West » 23 Feb 2019 19:29
23 Feb 2019 19:29Don't recall the first 44 minutes against Blackburn being particular good.SCIAG wrote:We've used that phrase about every third match because it's true - every three matches or so we play really well, and today was one such example. We need to add the consistency.
by Henley Royal 1 » 23 Feb 2019 19:32
23 Feb 2019 19:32sandman wrote:FFSSCIAG wrote:Don't remember us getting into trouble from playing it out from the back today. I do remember us scoring a goal after playing it out from the back.Bristol Paul wrote:Rotherham tried hard, ran hard, but lacking quality. Our players think they are better than they are, Swift can’t tackle and is definitely not as good as he thinks he is. Moore is another, negative, poor touch and wish we’d sold him when we had the chance. Why do we persevere with getting into so much trouble from playing it out form the back, and we don’t play with any tempo whatsoever. If there was any doubt it would go down to the last day, there shouldn’t be now, we are so so poor and have no fight for the challenge in my view.
Honestly the negative here is completely baffling. Yes the sub was weird and the two dropped points are disappointing but we played really well. Every single player eho started can hold their head up high after that performance. Play like that every week and we'll be fine.
The phrase we've been saying since the 3rd of August.
I thought Moore played well one fantastic block agree with the substition right bloke off wrong bloke on.
The goal came about from getting the ball out wide and using some pace, not because of passing around the back, the passing just came along with it.
We then didn't bother getting it out wide with pace until just after Rotherham scored and then managed to get three chances that we should have done better with.
by Crowbar6753 » 23 Feb 2019 19:35
23 Feb 2019 19:35by Notts Royal » 23 Feb 2019 19:44
23 Feb 2019 19:44Really valid point. Both managers have spoken about the squad size being an issue. But more import to that is a settled team. Neither have mastered thatLower West wrote:Don't recall the first 44 minutes against Blackburn being particular good.SCIAG wrote:We've used that phrase about every third match because it's true - every three matches or so we play really well, and today was one such example. We need to add the consistency.
The inconsistancy of the team selection this season speaks volumes. Must be approaching a 100 changes match to match. I know that we were top of that particular league a few weeks ago.
by URZZZZ » 23 Feb 2019 19:51
23 Feb 2019 19:51Absolute nonsense, Barrow has played pretty much every game this season and hasn't contributed anything, Harriott isn't the answer either, we should have signed two natural wingers in the window but we didn't and it's coming back to bite us because they're useless. McCleary was a lot better today though TBFCrowbar6753 wrote: I'm afraid McCleary is clearly past his best and as said Meite is a Joke!! Barrow or Harriott should be our regular Right Wingers as they have the raw pace and ability to make things happen. Rant over.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Lower West and 95 guests