double d wrote:ACTUAL FCKING ROFLOLOLOLOLOLOL AT MY DESK AT WORK OUT LOUDgenome wrote:double d wrote:Not authorised to see it. Wotsit say?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
its th egayest thing ive ever seen
and ive seen some pretty gay stuff
double d wrote:ACTUAL FCKING ROFLOLOLOLOLOLOL AT MY DESK AT WORK OUT LOUDgenome wrote:double d wrote:Not authorised to see it. Wotsit say?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
genome wrote:CountryRoyal wrote:+1WAZZOCK wrote:That mongtard posted something similar after the Fulham playoff match, and it wasn't funny then.
It's not even well write.
genome wrote:CountryRoyal wrote:+1WAZZOCK wrote:That mongtard posted something similar after the Fulham playoff match, and it wasn't funny then.
It's not even well write.
Enjoyed that - cheersgenome wrote:Leeds fan vlog from the day with some good shots of the action, including some decent shots of the Reading fans celebrating from about 4 minutes in. Limbs at 4:12, also love the reaction to the penalty miss![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYREvsjAogc
+1 to thisunder the tin wrote:Dear oh dear
It's a little Pi$$ take on a social media platform, lighten up FFS.
I am sure the legions of LUFC fans will get over it, somehow.
Enjoyed this post in response to us being compared to MK Dons (wtf?):Warfield ED Stand wrote:https://www.s24su.com/forum/index.php?threads/memries-of-reading.59026/
Blades fans looking forward to our visit. Plastic, soulless, Tin Pot. The full Reading FC bingo!!
Usually the easy retort to these Yorkshire clubs that harp on about tradition is that we've won and achieved more in the last 15 years than Leeds, Sheffield United and Sheffield Wednesday have put together. And 15 years is a long time.History is a poor substitute for success. We sound like pigs when we start calling clubs tinpot and go on about history. We've won oxf*rd all for nearly a hundred years. Most of our history is nothing more than longevity.
It is a bit odd, seems to be a common theme amongst many northern clubs. What they either don't realise, or choose to ignore is that football was effectively a closed shop for the northern sides and a few London sides until 1920 when they were kind enough to let us southern sides join in, so you know, they all got a nice head start. The comparison to MK Dons is a bit extreme though isn't it? Yes the Madejski can be a bit flat and is located outside the town centre but we didn't pack up and move to a different County.genome wrote:Enjoyed this post in response to us being compared to MK Dons (wtf?):Warfield ED Stand wrote:https://www.s24su.com/forum/index.php?threads/memries-of-reading.59026/
Blades fans looking forward to our visit. Plastic, soulless, Tin Pot. The full Reading FC bingo!!
Usually the easy retort to these Yorkshire clubs that harp on about tradition is that we've won and achieved more in the last 15 years than Leeds, Sheffield United and Sheffield Wednesday have put together. And 15 years is a long time.History is a poor substitute for success. We sound like pigs when we start calling clubs tinpot and go on about history. We've won oxf*rd all for nearly a hundred years. Most of our history is nothing more than longevity.
by From Despair To Where? » 19 Oct 2017 19:06
19 Oct 2017 19:06Possession is just a percentage of the passes each team made, so it should add up to 100.Nameless wrote:LOL at people worrying that the possession stats don't add up to 100. It makes little sense for them to add up to 100.
Perfectly possible for neither side to have possession of the ball at times. It's only a guesstimate anyway......
That seems somewhat flawed as a system.tmesis wrote:Possession is just a percentage of the passes each team made, so it should add up to 100.Nameless wrote:LOL at people worrying that the possession stats don't add up to 100. It makes little sense for them to add up to 100.
Perfectly possible for neither side to have possession of the ball at times. It's only a guesstimate anyway......
I thought possession is how long you hold onto the ball?tmesis wrote:Possession is just a percentage of the passes each team made, so it should add up to 100.Nameless wrote:LOL at people worrying that the possession stats don't add up to 100. It makes little sense for them to add up to 100.
Perfectly possible for neither side to have possession of the ball at times. It's only a guesstimate anyway......
by East Grinstead Royal » 20 Oct 2017 11:48
20 Oct 2017 11:48That was kinda what I was hinting at bud in a subtle way.East Grinstead Royal wrote:It is.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 39 guests