So, the club that spunked £7m on Aluko should waste at least as much again, in order to fill a fraction of the black hole created in the first place.Victor Meldrew wrote: Some club may pay the £10 million that has been mooted-I remain of the opinion that anything above £1 million with plenty of add-ons represents a good deal for the club when we are in the parlous financial position that we are-
Don't think £1m would make much difference to our finances at the moment. If that was all we would get we should definitely keep himWoodcote Royal wrote:So, the club that spunked £7m on Aluko should waste at least as much again, in order to fill a fraction of the black hole created in the first place.Victor Meldrew wrote: Some club may pay the £10 million that has been mooted-I remain of the opinion that anything above £1 million with plenty of add-ons represents a good deal for the club when we are in the parlous financial position that we are-
You are Ron Gourlay and I claim my £5
Don't understand your point.Woodcote Royal wrote:So, the club that spunked £7m on Aluko should waste at least as much again, in order to fill a fraction of the black hole created in the first place.Victor Meldrew wrote: Some club may pay the £10 million that has been mooted-I remain of the opinion that anything above £1 million with plenty of add-ons represents a good deal for the club when we are in the parlous financial position that we are-
You are Ron Gourlay and I claim my £5
Users browsing this forum: 78royal, Ahrefs [Bot] and 70 guests