Sutekh wrote:Only just thanks to Everton in City's second game of the season!strap wrote:Well the 13 wins from the start of a league season is safe for another year after only 6 games.
So City just fell 12 games short then? Real squeaky bum time there!Sutekh wrote:Only just thanks to Everton in City's second game of the season!strap wrote:Well the 13 wins from the start of a league season is safe for another year after only 6 games.
On December 3, 2005, we beat Luton 3-0 to go 4 points clear at the top with 53 points, as our 21st match unbeaten and 6th straight league win in a run of 10, scoring at least 2 in each game. Then we really hit form!Nameless wrote:We didn’t really hit form until about this time in our record season!
Not if they can't beat a side in the bottom 3 and who only had 10 men for half an hourWolves averaging 2.29 points per game - 105 points at that rateHalf Biscuit wrote:On December 3, 2005, we beat Luton 3-0 to go 4 points clear at the top with 53 points, as our 21st match unbeaten and 6th straight league win in a run of 10, scoring at least 2 in each game. Then we really hit form!Nameless wrote:We didn’t really hit form until about this time in our record season!
Wolves might get close to that...
yep, Santos won Novembers MOTM...nailed-on sh1t December for themFrom Despair To Where? wrote:If Wolves win their next 2 games, it would take them to 54pts at the half way mark. They would have to match that in the second half of the season to beat the record. They won't do it.
Today's home 0-0 draw v Sunderland sees them drop below the curve. Extrapolate their results to date through to the end of the season and they will finish with 105. However, I would be surprised if they don't drop a higher percentage of the points available in the second half of the season.From Despair To Where? wrote:If Wolves win their next 2 games, it would take them to 54pts at the half way mark. They would have to match that in the second half of the season to beat the record. They won't do it.
They look pretty damn unstoppable right now, but surely, SURELY they have to drop at least the 7pts more required.genome wrote:At this rate, Man City will be a threat to 106
They look pretty damn unstoppable right now, but surely, SURELY they have to drop at least the 7pts more required.[/quote]tidus_mi2 wrote:genome wrote:At this rate, Man City will be a threat to 106
Fox Talbot wrote:They look pretty damn unstoppable right now, but surely, SURELY they have to drop at least the 7pts more required.tidus_mi2 wrote:genome wrote:At this rate, Man City will be a threat to 106
Our record on 1st January 1986, prior to the home game against Gillingham (which we lost 1-2) was P24 W20 D2 L2. 62 points is the same as City, but they have done it in two games less. However, we were NINETEEN points clear of Walsall in second.Our record of 60 points by New Year's Day stands. If it is in fact our record.
Biscuits of 85/86 >>>>>>>> Citeh of 17/18
Yep. Screwed up my acca but I'm happy to lose that one!The Reverend wrote:At least some good news today
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Forbury Lion and 212 guests