We have two many wingers. But seeing as theyre all injured and or shit and or passed it, and we seem to want to revert to 4-4-2 we probably need this guy.Berry wrote:So we had too many wingers then not enough and who will get on the end of crosses?...Bod or the tall McNulty...Who's running the club FFS
This is Reading afterall.Old Man Andrews wrote:Imagine writing off a new loan signing before he's even kicked a ball for us.
Some really embarrassing stuff in this thread.
I’m not a massive fan of Meite through the middle but would probably prefer him to Bod. Perhaps Meite and McNulty could be an interesting front two. Certainly has a ring to it if nothing else!Snowflake Royal wrote:We have two many wingers. But seeing as theyre all injured and or shit and or passed it, and we seem to want to revert to 4-4-2 we probably need this guy.Berry wrote:So we had too many wingers then not enough and who will get on the end of crosses?...Bod or the tall McNulty...Who's running the club FFS
Crosses don't have to be high chap. Meite and Bod are fairly tall anyway.
What I'd like to see is the same attacking collective, be it one two or three, given five games to build some sort of understanding and partnership.CountryRoyal wrote:I’m not a massive fan of Meite through the middle but would probably prefer him to Bod. Perhaps Meite and McNulty could be an interesting front two. Certainly has a ring to it if nothing else!Snowflake Royal wrote:We have two many wingers. But seeing as theyre all injured and or shit and or passed it, and we seem to want to revert to 4-4-2 we probably need this guy.Berry wrote:So we had too many wingers then not enough and who will get on the end of crosses?...Bod or the tall McNulty...Who's running the club FFS
Crosses don't have to be high chap. Meite and Bod are fairly tall anyway.
It’s a good point about consistency and we now have a chance to do that. Baldock and McNulty have had two games together now and have shown glimpses of promise. Will he stick with it?Snowflake Royal wrote:What I'd like to see is the same attacking collective, be it one two or three, given five games to build some sort of understanding and partnership.CountryRoyal wrote:I’m not a massive fan of Meite through the middle but would probably prefer him to Bod. Perhaps Meite and McNulty could be an interesting front two. Certainly has a ring to it if nothing else!Snowflake Royal wrote: We have two many wingers. But seeing as theyre all injured and or shit and or passed it, and we seem to want to revert to 4-4-2 we probably need this guy.
Crosses don't have to be high chap. Meite and Bod are fairly tall anyway.
I prefer Bod to Meite, he has his limitations but he's more polished, I'd rather Yak as an attacking sub. Personally my preference is Bod and McNulty. But really I don't care which of them it is, so long as they get a bloody chance to build something before the pack is shuffled yet again.
Not my preferred pairing by any stretch, but yeah, they should get at least a couple more. Still no goals, switch it up.CountryRoyal wrote:It’s a good point about consistency and we now have a chance to do that. Baldock and McNulty have had two games together now and have shown glimpses of promise. Will he stick with it?Snowflake Royal wrote:What I'd like to see is the same attacking collective, be it one two or three, given five games to build some sort of understanding and partnership.CountryRoyal wrote:
I’m not a massive fan of Meite through the middle but would probably prefer him to Bod. Perhaps Meite and McNulty could be an interesting front two. Certainly has a ring to it if nothing else!
I prefer Bod to Meite, he has his limitations but he's more polished, I'd rather Yak as an attacking sub. Personally my preference is Bod and McNulty. But really I don't care which of them it is, so long as they get a bloody chance to build something before the pack is shuffled yet again.
If you are surprised by that you are in the wrong place, I think we have the most fickle bunch in the country.Old Man Andrews wrote:Imagine writing off a new loan signing before he's even kicked a ball for us.
Some really embarrassing stuff in this thread.
Is fluid another word for shit? I can't even work out our best shape let alone XI. It should include Yiadom, Moore, Ilori, Obita and Barrow, but oxf*rd knows on the rest.Denver Royal wrote:I’m warming to Méïté. Only turned 22 this year. Good signing by Stam, and then a good loan out. Has stuff in his locker we don’t, re. Champ. Wish he was couple inches taller. Not sure he’s a wide player, reckon Clement gives him minutes there to get him on the park. Worried he may get squeezed out by numbers now.
Ian, good points re. settled side. Not sure what our 1st eleven is/should be right now? It seems too fluid.
If we wanted to go more direct he is easily the most adept at flicking the ball on. He wins headers up against defenders with his back to goal. This is something neither Bod nor any other forward we currently have is capable of. Whether he can attack a ball crossed into the penalty area in the way Bod can remains to be seen. I'm not sure he's a winger really ( I have real bugbear in the modern game and I see it on here a lot too about players who aren't wingers being described as such)* but the temptation to play him out wide where he can be a pretty effective as an aerial outlet or with his pace is clearly there for Clement.Denver Royal wrote:I’m warming to Méïté. Only turned 22 this year. Good signing by Stam, and then a good loan out. Has stuff in his locker we don’t, re. Champ. Wish he was couple inches taller. Not sure he’s a wide player, reckon Clement gives him minutes there to get him on the park. Worried he may get squeezed out by numbers now.
Ian, good points re. settled side. Not sure what our 1st eleven is/should be right now? It seems too fluid.
Vision wrote: * Aluko is not a winger. Aside from spunking too much money on him our biggest oxf*rd has been constantly playing him as one and expecting a positive outcome.
He is most definitely a winger. He might not be a very good one but that is his natural position.Sutekh wrote:Vision wrote: * Aluko is not a winger. Aside from spunking too much money on him our biggest oxf*rd has been constantly playing him as one and expecting a positive outcome.
What is he then. He isn't a central midfielder or striker either. Wing appears to be the place where he's best.
He's a dribbler.Sutekh wrote:Vision wrote: * Aluko is not a winger. Aside from spunking too much money on him our biggest oxf*rd has been constantly playing him as one and expecting a positive outcome.
What is he then. He isn't a central midfielder or striker either. Wing appears to be the place where he's best.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], gazmandu, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Polish International, Starry Blue Hooped Wonder and 362 guests