by Old Man Andrews » 03 Sep 2020 10:56
03 Sep 2020 10:56by royalp-we » 03 Sep 2020 11:37
03 Sep 2020 11:37by Old Man Andrews » 03 Sep 2020 11:41
03 Sep 2020 11:41I haven't mentioned Puscas you moron.royalp-we wrote:OMA - just to let you know, your FGS Puscas is on international duty with Romania.
Are you oxf*rd mental
by Old Man Andrews » 03 Sep 2020 11:47
03 Sep 2020 11:47To elaborate on this Snowball just make it so everyone knows the criteria and it is set in stone.Old Man Andrews wrote:There is no extra time. Are you all oxf*rd mental?
Snowball, simplify this shit please. It is getting ridiculous.
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 11:55
03 Sep 2020 11:55Pepe the Horseman wrote:Thought I'd pop in and leave a quick prediction, but this all seems VERY complicated.
by Pepe the Horseman » 03 Sep 2020 11:57
03 Sep 2020 11:57So you just want the FGS? Not all goal scorers?Snowball wrote:Pepe the Horseman wrote:Thought I'd pop in and leave a quick prediction, but this all seems VERY complicated.
It might LOOK complicated but it ain’t
Pick the HT SCORE or Result
Pick the FT SCORE or Result
Pick first team to score bonus for when
Pick first Reading scorer ditto
That’s the core
Bonuses for predicting sides who gain points from a losing position and (rarely) getting the goal sequence right from, say, a 3-2 win
Nobbers don’t need to concern themselves with details They just need to get their predictions in on time, ideally with the right format
The reason for that and “explicitly stating” (for example) “Colchester to win from behind” or Reading to Score First in first half is to make it easier for me to enter the data.
Reading’s gonna win
or
Reading (1) 1 Colchester (0) 2 just takes a lot of time to “parse” and if certain Nobbers choose not go go with making my life a tad easier they lose five points every time. Their loss
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 12:07
03 Sep 2020 12:07Pepe the Horseman wrote:Thought I'd pop in and leave a quick prediction, but this all seems VERY complicated.
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 12:10
03 Sep 2020 12:10People can post first, second, third scorers (And they usually do) but the points are for FIRST RDG scorer, the others are just for interestPepe the Horseman wrote:So you just want the FGS? Not all goal scorers?Snowball wrote:Pepe the Horseman wrote:Thought I'd pop in and leave a quick prediction, but this all seems VERY complicated.
It might LOOK complicated but it ain’t
Pick the HT SCORE or Result
Pick the FT SCORE or Result
Pick first team to score bonus for when
Pick first Reading scorer ditto
That’s the core
Bonuses for predicting sides who gain points from a losing position and (rarely) getting the goal sequence right from, say, a 3-2 win
Nobbers don’t need to concern themselves with details They just need to get their predictions in on time, ideally with the right format
The reason for that and “explicitly stating” (for example) “Colchester to win from behind” or Reading to Score First in first half is to make it easier for me to enter the data.
Reading’s gonna win
or
Reading (1) 1 Colchester (0) 2 just takes a lot of time to “parse” and if certain Nobbers choose not go go with making my life a tad easier they lose five points every time. Their loss
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 12:11
03 Sep 2020 12:11Pepe the Horseman wrote:So you just want the FGS? Not all goal scorers?Snowball wrote:Pepe the Horseman wrote:Thought I'd pop in and leave a quick prediction, but this all seems VERY complicated.
It might LOOK complicated but it ain’t
Pick the HT SCORE or Result
Pick the FT SCORE or Result
Pick first team to score bonus for when
Pick first Reading scorer ditto
That’s the core
Bonuses for predicting sides who gain points from a losing position and (rarely) getting the goal sequence right from, say, a 3-2 win
Nobbers don’t need to concern themselves with details They just need to get their predictions in on time, ideally with the right format
The reason for that and “explicitly stating” (for example) “Colchester to win from behind” or Reading to Score First in first half is to make it easier for me to enter the data.
Reading’s gonna win
or
Reading (1) 1 Colchester (0) 2 just takes a lot of time to “parse” and if certain Nobbers choose not go go with making my life a tad easier they lose five points every time. Their loss
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 13:00
03 Sep 2020 13:00by The Royal Forester » 03 Sep 2020 13:51
03 Sep 2020 13:51
by SouthDownsRoyal » 03 Sep 2020 18:47
03 Sep 2020 18:47by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 19:14
03 Sep 2020 19:14[/quote]SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Reading 0-0 Colchester HT
Reading 1-1 Colchester FT
================
56, joao
Penalties
Reading 3-5 Colchester
by EverHopeful » 03 Sep 2020 19:40
03 Sep 2020 19:40by Ascotexgunner » 03 Sep 2020 19:57
03 Sep 2020 19:57
by SouthDownsRoyal » 03 Sep 2020 20:25
03 Sep 2020 20:25Snowball wrote:SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Reading 0-0 Colchester HT
Reading 1-1 Colchester FT
================
56, joao
Penalties
Reading 3-5 Colchester
by UpNorth » 03 Sep 2020 20:33
03 Sep 2020 20:33
by SouthDownsRoyal » 03 Sep 2020 20:42
03 Sep 2020 20:42[/quote]SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Reading 0-0 Colchester HT
Reading 1-1 Colchester FT
================
56, joao
77, someone who plays for Colchester
Penalties
Reading 3-5 Colchester
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 21:09
03 Sep 2020 21:091-1 do I need to name the scorer for Colchester?SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Snowball wrote:SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Reading 0-0 Colchester HT
Reading 1-1 Colchester FT
================
56, joao
Penalties
Reading 3-5 Colchester
You don’t have Colchester scoring or have you predicted first team to score
Are you predicting 1-0 or 1-1?
by Snowball » 03 Sep 2020 21:11
03 Sep 2020 21:11[/quote]SouthDownsRoyal wrote:SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Reading 0-0 Colchester HT
Reading 1-1 Colchester FT
================
56, joao
77, someone who plays for Colchester
Penalties
Reading 3-5 Colchester
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 33 guests