big crowd and a lot of what we have already seen this season…just not since boxing day admittedlypaultheroyal wrote:Guts, determination, up and at them, fight, bodies on line, committed.
Just a few words / phrases to sum up that performance. Just need to work on that end product.
What an atmosphere today. Best in years. Club 1871 led the whole ground brilliantly.
More of the same please.
AthleticoSpizz wrote:big crowdpaultheroyal wrote:Guts, determination, up and at them, fight, bodies on line, committed.
Just a few words / phrases to sum up that performance. Just need to work on that end product.
What an atmosphere today. Best in years. Club 1871 led the whole ground brilliantly.
More of the same please.
AthleticoSpizz wrote:big crowd and a lot of what we have already seen this season…just not since boxing day admittedly…no goals tho’paultheroyal wrote:Guts, determination, up and at them, fight, bodies on line, committed.
Just a few words / phrases to sum up that performance. Just need to work on that end product.
What an atmosphere today. Best in years. Club 1871 led the whole ground brilliantly.
More of the same please.
Disagree. More structure today. Bodies on line. A response to the crowd. More fight. Appeared more evident.AthleticoSpizz wrote:AthleticoSpizz wrote:big crowd and a lot of what we have already seen this season…just not since boxing day admittedly…no goals tho’paultheroyal wrote:Guts, determination, up and at them, fight, bodies on line, committed.
Just a few words / phrases to sum up that performance. Just need to work on that end product.
What an atmosphere today. Best in years. Club 1871 led the whole ground brilliantly.
More of the same please.
+1 he was clearly wasting timeElm Park Kid wrote:To be fair the ref - Lumley dropped the ball, picked up a bottle, had a bit of a leisurely drink, and didn't even look like taking the goal kick until he got booked. It was pretty textbook time wasting.Sutekh wrote:We’ll do e to everyone, really dug in well and deserved a point that finally stops Burnley’s chance to break the record.
Yiadom easily motm but everyone played their part. Brilliant to see Camara get returned to the squad and again impressed in his small cameo, Azeez did provide the only real outlet, if only his crossing was more consistent. Joke referee booking Lumley for time wasting, I presume he was expected to take the goal kick while the ref had his back turned to play![]()
If only they’d dumped Ince after the Hull game and given Hunt a couple of weeks grace to pull things together we may have given ourselves a better shot at staying up.
At least that should give confidence to the players and some belief in what Noel is trying to do. Can’t help think Luton might turn out to be harder still though.
Big crowd certainly helps uspaultheroyal wrote:Disagree. More structure today. Bodies on line. A response to the crowd. More fight. Appeared more evident.AthleticoSpizz wrote:AthleticoSpizz wrote:big crowd and a lot of what we have already seen this season…just not since boxing day admittedly…no goals tho’
He's not had many 90 mins this season and has been nursing injuries. We were really high-intensity as well today, and he was working really hard defensively, so I'm not surprised he pulled up a bit towards the end.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Nice, but more of an indictment of our “lovely” training facilities?
If he wasn’t up to playing 90 minutes, he shouldn’t have been started.
Still not getting it how a pro kid gets ‘cramp’ playing on a billiard surface after just 70
yes, the crowd helped, the (some) players rose to the occasion (glad they did) …still no goals tho’paultheroyal wrote:Disagree. More structure today. Bodies on line. A response to the crowd. More fight. Appeared more evident.AthleticoSpizz wrote:AthleticoSpizz wrote:big crowd and a lot of what we have already seen this season…just not since boxing day admittedly…no goals tho’
That’s why he’s been one of our best players. We’re going to need all of that business to get us over the line.Hound wrote:Most unlike Lumley that. Right out of characterElm Park Kid wrote:To be fair the ref - Lumley dropped the ball, picked up a bottle, had a bit of a leisurely drink, and didn't even look like taking the goal kick until he got booked. It was pretty textbook time wasting.Sutekh wrote:We’ll do e to everyone, really dug in well and deserved a point that finally stops Burnley’s chance to break the record.
Yiadom easily motm but everyone played their part. Brilliant to see Camara get returned to the squad and again impressed in his small cameo, Azeez did provide the only real outlet, if only his crossing was more consistent. Joke referee booking Lumley for time wasting, I presume he was expected to take the goal kick while the ref had his back turned to play![]()
If only they’d dumped Ince after the Hull game and given Hunt a couple of weeks grace to pull things together we may have given ourselves a better shot at staying up.
At least that should give confidence to the players and some belief in what Noel is trying to do. Can’t help think Luton might turn out to be harder still though.
No, Ince had been pilloried for not starting with Azeez more.AthleticoSpizz wrote:I am not criticising the kid, just the choice of starting a 70 minute (capable) player….if Ince had dared do that, he’d have been rightly pilloried here….big time
+1paultheroyal wrote:Guts, determination, up and at them, fight, bodies on line, committed.
Just a few words / phrases to sum up that performance. Just need to work on that end product.
What an atmosphere today. Best in years. Club 1871 led the whole ground brilliantly.
More of the same please.
Genuinely, do you understand what cramp is ?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Yes of course…..but “cramp” ffs
Get real sucker
Indeed. Given that a well organised team will have let their players know at half time who is coming off when given specific score permutations, if you know you're coming off at 70 you should try to empty your tank to the 70th minute, so that you've made the maximum contribution possible.MR.CYNICAL wrote:No, Ince had been pilloried for not starting with Azeez more.AthleticoSpizz wrote:I am not criticising the kid, just the choice of starting a 70 minute (capable) player….if Ince had dared do that, he’d have been rightly pilloried here….big time
Better to start with a '70 minute (capable) player' so as to get the best from him and sub him when he's done.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Marcel, Polish International, Tinpot Royal and 137 guests