sorry. auto spell check haha.M-U-R-T-Y wrote:Friday's Legacy wrote:set a president
Since they merged with Havant they have a nice little ground down the road from my old flat in West Leigh, Havant. Can't see it being suitable for any reincarnation of Portsmouth. I believe it can hold around 5,000 fans at the moment. But why should they give it up for them?paultheroyal wrote:What's the situ with waterlooville? They had a great little ground behind industrial units but then merged with Havant. That arrangement still in place or did they reform?
Nah,Ideal wrote:It's really unfair that we have to play Portsmouth when they might go bust a few days later, it's just really unfair.
LOLRoyal With Cheese wrote:Nah,Ideal wrote:It's really unfair that we have to play Portsmouth when they might go bust a few days later, it's just really unfair.
I actually hope they win this game - then have their record expunged.
I'm imagining the incredulity of a purple faced Allardyce on Sky Sports News - it would definately make my day.
a ground-share wouldn't really be giving it up. pompey will fill it every week. h&W will benefit from a tenancy fee, takings from food and drink sold etc. valuable income to aid h&w's ambitions to climb the leagues. bournemouth is also being mooted this morning.buzzby wrote:Since they merged with Havant they have a nice little ground down the road from my old flat in West Leigh, Havant. Can't see it being suitable for any reincarnation of Portsmouth. I believe it can hold around 5,000 fans at the moment. But why should they give it up for them?paultheroyal wrote:What's the situ with waterlooville? They had a great little ground behind industrial units but then merged with Havant. That arrangement still in place or did they reform?
As above the thought of 1,000's of Portsmouth fans running riot every other week doesn't sound good. Especially as my local is opposite Havant's groundFriday's Legacy wrote:a ground-share wouldn't really be giving it up. pompey will fill it every week. h&W will benefit from a tenancy fee, takings from food and drink sold etc. valuable income to aid h&w's ambitions to climb the leagues. bournemouth is also being mooted this morning.buzzby wrote:Since they merged with Havant they have a nice little ground down the road from my old flat in West Leigh, Havant. Can't see it being suitable for any reincarnation of Portsmouth. I believe it can hold around 5,000 fans at the moment. But why should they give it up for them?paultheroyal wrote:What's the situ with waterlooville? They had a great little ground behind industrial units but then merged with Havant. That arrangement still in place or did they reform?
We need a poll on the number of fans Pompey will take to away games in the 7th tier.buzzby wrote:As above the thought of 1,000's of Portsmouth fans running riot every other week doesn't sound good. Especially as my local is opposite Havant's groundFriday's Legacy wrote:a ground-share wouldn't really be giving it up. pompey will fill it every week. h&W will benefit from a tenancy fee, takings from food and drink sold etc. valuable income to aid h&w's ambitions to climb the leagues. bournemouth is also being mooted this morning.buzzby wrote: Since they merged with Havant they have a nice little ground down the road from my old flat in West Leigh, Havant. Can't see it being suitable for any reincarnation of Portsmouth. I believe it can hold around 5,000 fans at the moment. But why should they give it up for them?
I'd've had no probs if he'd saidWimb wrote:Could well all be BS. Just pointing out that he wasn't going totally mental throwing by saying £4k average on one hand then saying 4 good players for £38k.
Couldn't agree more.Snowball wrote:You have to admit there would be a delicious bit of Karma if Pompey go tits-up and West Ham miss automatic.
West Ham cheated to stay up (officially) and Pompey didn't try against them and got us relegated in the final game.
So between them they cost us a MINIMUM of 40 Million if we'd only lasted one more season.
Of course we might well have consolidated season three and become a good mid-table side and been 200 Million better off
So, frankly, Pompey crashing and taking down West Ham, allowing us in and then up, is just PERFECT.
True, wasn't the best explained post on the boardSnowball wrote:I'd've had no probs if he'd saidWimb wrote:Could well all be BS. Just pointing out that he wasn't going totally mental throwing by saying £4k average on one hand then saying 4 good players for £38k.
Average player is 4K. You c'n get a VVG player under 10K, could get 4 for 38K
But wot was writ was odd
I have sympathy for Sheffield United obviously but they still had it in their hands on the final day of that season and bottled it at home to Wigan.Woodcote Royal wrote:Couldn't agree more.Snowball wrote:You have to admit there would be a delicious bit of Karma if Pompey go tits-up and West Ham miss automatic.
West Ham cheated to stay up (officially) and Pompey didn't try against them and got us relegated in the final game.
So between them they cost us a MINIMUM of 40 Million if we'd only lasted one more season.
Of course we might well have consolidated season three and become a good mid-table side and been 200 Million better off
So, frankly, Pompey crashing and taking down West Ham, allowing us in and then up, is just PERFECT.
In fact, no one has lost more than Sheffield United following the outrageous decision not to relegate West Ham following their blatant flouting of the transfer rules. Surely the time to finally dispose of this nasty little club's unofficial World Cup Veto is long overdue
As for Portsmouth (and whilst I have genuine sympathy for the fans despite the fact they rarely treat us with anything but contempt) if they survive this latest round of massive debts, every club in the country will know the governing bodies are toothless in this respect, bar the docking of a few points, and can largely be ignored as and when it suits.
If there's any justice remaining in English football, Portsmouth and it's annoying bell should be shoved into the Solent long before the seasons end so the final table, at long last, will be a fair reflection of those who played by the rules.
Out of interest Paul, did you witness any disorder?paultheroyal wrote:Aldershot regularly took over 2000 to each away game following their demise.
I remember refereeing a game for them against Chalfont St Peter I believe where the kick off was delayed by 40 minutes because the old lady who took the gate money from a chair and table at he back of the ground could not cope with the hundreds coming through.
Portsmouth would take thousands around non league circuit.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Yellowcoat2 and 3 guests