by SCIAG » 24 Oct 2020 17:02
24 Oct 2020 17:02by yuomi » 24 Oct 2020 17:05
24 Oct 2020 17:05bcubed wrote:37% possession
But 6 shots on target compared to 1
by South Coast Royal » 24 Oct 2020 17:06
24 Oct 2020 17:06Had both the TV and i-follow on-it looks as though i-follow is about 2 minutes behind real time.bcubed wrote:you watching on iFollow?WoodleyRoyal wrote:Penalty!!!
You seem to be ahead of the pictures!
by RoyalBlue » 24 Oct 2020 17:07
24 Oct 2020 17:07Some of the other percentage stats were much better.yuomi wrote:bcubed wrote:37% possession
But 6 shots on target compared to 1
37% possession, 63% pass accuracy.
Pure Shithousery.
by Simmops » 24 Oct 2020 17:09
24 Oct 2020 17:09
by RoyalBlue » 24 Oct 2020 17:09
24 Oct 2020 17:09But Joao deserved some reward for his work when he came on and created the penalty from nothing. I wouldn't have fancied taking that kick - their keeper made himself look massive in that goal!Royal Ginger wrote:Pointless penalty should have gone to Meite.
Reading have got better but Rotherham don’t deserve the scoreline.
by WoodleyRoyal » 24 Oct 2020 17:10
24 Oct 2020 17:10by Simmops » 24 Oct 2020 17:11
24 Oct 2020 17:11by Silver Fox » 24 Oct 2020 17:12
24 Oct 2020 17:12by Royal Ginger » 24 Oct 2020 17:13
24 Oct 2020 17:13Valid point, he deserved something, just feels like a hat-trick is good for morale. Either answer is valid I suppose.RoyalBlue wrote:But Joao deserved some reward for his work when he came on and created the penalty from nothing. I wouldn't have fancied taking that kick - their keeper made himself look massive in that goal!Royal Ginger wrote:Pointless penalty should have gone to Meite.
Reading have got better but Rotherham don’t deserve the scoreline.
by WoodleyRoyal » 24 Oct 2020 17:13
24 Oct 2020 17:13by genome » 24 Oct 2020 17:15
24 Oct 2020 17:15You drunk m8?Simmops wrote:Anybody that doesnt ho to games isnt a real fan, none of you are reak fans like me
by WoodleyRoyal » 24 Oct 2020 17:16
24 Oct 2020 17:16Ffs I was enjoying everyone ignoring him. Why did you replygenome wrote:You drunk m8?Simmops wrote:Anybody that doesnt ho to games isnt a real fan, none of you are reak fans like me
by Snowball » 24 Oct 2020 17:17
24 Oct 2020 17:17He often is, but then he gets goals, so what's to do?NewCorkSeth wrote:And people on here think Meite is shit.
by JR » 24 Oct 2020 17:25
24 Oct 2020 17:25Dellor also got this wrong. It needs to be a clear goalscoring opportunity - certainly wasn’t as the ball was heading off towards the corner flag.tidus_mi2 wrote:If that was a foul, should have been a red for Wood really.
by JR » 24 Oct 2020 17:41
24 Oct 2020 17:41And don’t mess with the assigned penalty takers. We’ve had too many years of poor penalty stats to start messing around with the plans just to be nice.RoyalBlue wrote:But Joao deserved some reward for his work when he came on and created the penalty from nothing. I wouldn't have fancied taking that kick - their keeper made himself look massive in that goal!Royal Ginger wrote:Pointless penalty should have gone to Meite.
Reading have got better but Rotherham don’t deserve the scoreline.
by leon » 24 Oct 2020 17:54
24 Oct 2020 17:54Yep certainly seems that way Woodleyers . Just a shame we’re not in the ground to see it/boo them.WoodleyRoyal wrote:500 users online 16 page match thread. The good times are coming back.
by Hound » 24 Oct 2020 18:08
24 Oct 2020 18:08by WoodleyRoyal » 24 Oct 2020 18:11
24 Oct 2020 18:11And this usually a sign of a good team to win when not playing well, or so the old cliche goes. However are we a good side not playing very well, or a shit side being lucky?Hound wrote:4 home wins on the trot without conceding is amazing considering how useless we were at home the last few years
And we haven’t even played very well in them
by windermereROYAL » 24 Oct 2020 18:12
24 Oct 2020 18:12Do we care? it will still be 3-0 in the Sunday papers.Royal Ginger wrote:Pointless penalty should have gone to Meite.
Reading have got better but Rotherham don’t deserve the scoreline.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 70 guests