?Green wrote:How many times had the football stadium flooded since it's been there?
It's raised up on a rubbish dump, the Pru development would be at water level ("LOLakeside LOLiving"
by John Madejski's Wallet » 08 Oct 2013 23:21
08 Oct 2013 23:21?Green wrote:How many times had the football stadium flooded since it's been there?
by John Madejski's Wallet » 09 Oct 2013 22:23
09 Oct 2013 22:23Let me try a different tack - how often has the train track flooded? How often is that line closed?John Madejski's Wallet wrote:?Green wrote:How many times had the football stadium flooded since it's been there?
It's raised up on a rubbish dump, the Pru development would be at water level ("LOLakeside LOLiving")
by John Madejski's Wallet » 10 Oct 2013 15:16
10 Oct 2013 15:16
by TheLawnMowerMan » 10 Oct 2013 22:41
10 Oct 2013 22:41The burden of proof will ultimately be on the developers, not me. But for plans to get to the advanced stage they did I'd say this had been considered and overcome - despite your anecdotal evidence about running along one stretch which you admit is right next to the canal.Icke wrote:I know we`ve gone a little off topic but JMW is correct, to all you talking about the Southcote/Theale development and saying "oh it`s just a little bit of marshland" can you back this up with any facts?
I can, and trust me, alongside the canal and all across the fields/area where the houses were proposed to be built, it floods massively every year. I have been running these routes four times a week for the last 6 years and the flooding has been very bad. Last year was particularly bad and houses are just not viable anywhere along this band of land.
There is plenty of land that can be built on the UK but this land is not suitable. End of story.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests