Alexander Litvinenko wrote:No. I think the whole scheme is now dead in the water.
Hence no GP station.
Maybe. If he had any.Bandini wrote:Will this be seen as another hammer blow to Alexander Litvinenko's credibility?
Simon Beasley at the council wrote:Clearly we don't know how it will be serviced by trains
Is there a chance the tracks could bend?southbank1871 wrote:A monorail would be much more cost effective and fit for purpose.
It would help if they could spell "madjeski" properlyWycombe Royal wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-25198432
It will cost double that.Wycombe Royal wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-25198432
Not on your life, my Hindu friendLoyalRoyalFan wrote:Is there a chance the tracks could bend?southbank1871 wrote:A monorail would be much more cost effective and fit for purpose.
Just the one?bobby1413 wrote:Reading should get a tram
No, maybe 3 or 4 - buy them in bulk, be cheaper that way, or do a BOGOF deal or something.Norfolk Royal wrote:Just the one?bobby1413 wrote:Reading should get a tram
This is a public forumsouthbank1871 wrote:This announcement is certainly making me think twice about using Dirk as a contractor in the future. If he's not ITK about this, what does that say of his knowledge of the Y2K bug?
What about us brain-dead slobs?chilipepper91 wrote:Not on your life, my Hindu friendLoyalRoyalFan wrote:Is there a chance the tracks could bend?southbank1871 wrote:A monorail would be much more cost effective and fit for purpose.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests