It will be off.Sutekh wrote:12 hours of rain forecast up there which finishes around 2am before relenting for 12 hours or so, then it's back again so will be wet up there during the game.
Does your head go all the way to the top of that hat?NathStPaul wrote:It will be off.Sutekh wrote:12 hours of rain forecast up there which finishes around 2am before relenting for 12 hours or so, then it's back again so will be wet up there during the game.
I appreciate the frustration, but it's pervasive. It's the only real issue that matters. If you chose our fanbase L2 and a good owner or L1 with Dai, the result would be unanimous.Mr Angry wrote:And another thread that gets sucked into the ownership history/points deduction situation; I - and I suspect many others - enjoy reading about the upcoming matches (and Sutekh has done another excellent job here), so rather than have the same discussions that are going around and around on multiple other threads being regurgitated on every thread that is created, can we leave the threads that are for specific things just for those specific things?
Wish you were.NathStPaul wrote:It will be off.Sutekh wrote:12 hours of rain forecast up there which finishes around 2am before relenting for 12 hours or so, then it's back again so will be wet up there during the game.
Don't play games you can't compete in chump.windermereROYAL wrote:Wish you were.NathStPaul wrote:It will be off.Sutekh wrote:12 hours of rain forecast up there which finishes around 2am before relenting for 12 hours or so, then it's back again so will be wet up there during the game.
Its going to be called off.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Earnshaw just reporting driving through a blizzard, given he left lunch time he must be nearly there.
Met office is for rain on and off, heavy at times, until kick off
The EFL competition isn't fair to begin with. There are teams each season in the championship who are each given a huge amount of money every season by the Premier League giving them a bigger budget than anyone else in the championship and the other two EFL leagues. Therefore they have failed their attempts to make the competition "fair" at the first hurdle.Hendo wrote:Ok, but that's not really a red flag, is it?RoyalBlue wrote:https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/efl ... g-reading/Hendo wrote:
What were all the red flags when they allowed him to buy us?
That he liquidated 2 clubs after they approved his takeover? Or the fact the failed Hull takeover included a different consortium makeup?
Regardless of the different consortium aspect, from what I understand, the EPL shared their concerns about Dai with the EFL. The EFL also approved Dai's ownership conditionally and said he would be subject to increased scrutiny. It would seem they must have employed scrutineers who were as competent with numbers as Paul Simpson.
The EFL gave conditional approval for the deal in April but it has been reported that the Premier League, which gives input into the ownership status of teams who may compete in its competition, had been cautious about the deal due to aspects of the Dais' commercial history. Dai Yongge had earlier failed in an attempt to buy recently relegated Premier League club Hull City over concerns, later allayed, that he did not control the funds he was intending to use to complete the purchase. The Dais' takeover of Reading will remain subject to further oversight by the EFL.
The previous owners will retain a 25 per cent stake.
'The EFL can confirm that they have no objections to the change of control application made by Reading Football Club,' read an official statement issued by the EFL.
'Following a full review of the transaction, the EFL has insisted upon – and the club/new owners have agreed to – a number of additional reporting requirements including enhanced financial monitoring.
'This is so as to ensure that their performance is consistent with the application we have considered.
I still don't understand how the EFL are the big bad in this? They have a duty to the full set of 72 members to ensure the competition is fair. They don't have a magical crystal ball that allows them to see into the future.Dai Yongge had earlier failed in an attempt to buy recently relegated Premier League club Hull City over concerns, later allayed, that he did not control the funds he was intending to use to complete the purchase.
All signings by all clubs have to be ratified by the governing bodies if we could prove that we were able to sustain the signings made at the time, what else can they do?
And if they agree to the PL money deal, they will essentially be accepting that the Championship is just the PL naughty step. If PL relegated clubs are allowed vastly larger budgets and losses then getting in for a "new" club will involve finishing 4th through 6th and hoping to win the playoffs.Orion1871 wrote:The EFL competition isn't fair to begin with. There are teams each season in the championship who are each given a huge amount of money every season by the Premier League giving them a bigger budget than anyone else in the championship and the other two EFL leagues. Therefore they have failed their attempts to make the competition "fair" at the first hurdle.Hendo wrote:Ok, but that's not really a red flag, is it?RoyalBlue wrote:
https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/efl ... g-reading/
Regardless of the different consortium aspect, from what I understand, the EPL shared their concerns about Dai with the EFL. The EFL also approved Dai's ownership conditionally and said he would be subject to increased scrutiny. It would seem they must have employed scrutineers who were as competent with numbers as Paul Simpson.
I still don't understand how the EFL are the big bad in this? They have a duty to the full set of 72 members to ensure the competition is fair. They don't have a magical crystal ball that allows them to see into the future.Dai Yongge had earlier failed in an attempt to buy recently relegated Premier League club Hull City over concerns, later allayed, that he did not control the funds he was intending to use to complete the purchase.
All signings by all clubs have to be ratified by the governing bodies if we could prove that we were able to sustain the signings made at the time, what else can they do?
The scraps the other teams do get is financial blackmail from the Premier League, "Sign it or you don't get any money at all" leaving EFL clubs no choice but to sign up to the rules that the EFL impose.
Why are you always such an awful pcunt of an arrogant fan?Royal_jimmy wrote:They're just a jealous tinpot club who are ignorant to the reality of our situation. When they don't realise that the EFL have their fair share of blame to accept for the mess we're in by allowing Dai to buy us despite all the red flags.PieEater wrote:They seem deperate for us to go into administration and get hit with another points deduction. They don't seem to get the point the EFL penalties are based on precedent, apart from the world first for HMRC late payment.Blue Label wrote:Their fans are as deluded as the manager.
https://thebuzzisback.boards.net/thread ... -fc?page=5
They aren't.Hendo wrote:Ok, but that's not really a red flag, is it?RoyalBlue wrote:https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/efl ... g-reading/Hendo wrote:
What were all the red flags when they allowed him to buy us?
That he liquidated 2 clubs after they approved his takeover? Or the fact the failed Hull takeover included a different consortium makeup?
Regardless of the different consortium aspect, from what I understand, the EPL shared their concerns about Dai with the EFL. The EFL also approved Dai's ownership conditionally and said he would be subject to increased scrutiny. It would seem they must have employed scrutineers who were as competent with numbers as Paul Simpson.
The EFL gave conditional approval for the deal in April but it has been reported that the Premier League, which gives input into the ownership status of teams who may compete in its competition, had been cautious about the deal due to aspects of the Dais' commercial history. Dai Yongge had earlier failed in an attempt to buy recently relegated Premier League club Hull City over concerns, later allayed, that he did not control the funds he was intending to use to complete the purchase. The Dais' takeover of Reading will remain subject to further oversight by the EFL.
The previous owners will retain a 25 per cent stake.
'The EFL can confirm that they have no objections to the change of control application made by Reading Football Club,' read an official statement issued by the EFL.
'Following a full review of the transaction, the EFL has insisted upon – and the club/new owners have agreed to – a number of additional reporting requirements including enhanced financial monitoring.
'This is so as to ensure that their performance is consistent with the application we have considered.
I still don't understand how the EFL are the big bad in this? They have a duty to the full set of 72 members to ensure the competition is fair. They don't have a magical crystal ball that allows them to see into the future.Dai Yongge had earlier failed in an attempt to buy recently relegated Premier League club Hull City over concerns, later allayed, that he did not control the funds he was intending to use to complete the purchase.
All signings by all clubs have to be ratified by the governing bodies if we could prove that we were able to sustain the signings made at the time, what else can they do?
Why are you such a marxist fan who touches kids?Snowflake Royal wrote:Why are you always such an awful pcunt of an arrogant fan?Royal_jimmy wrote:They're just a jealous tinpot club who are ignorant to the reality of our situation. When they don't realise that the EFL have their fair share of blame to accept for the mess we're in by allowing Dai to buy us despite all the red flags.PieEater wrote:
They seem deperate for us to go into administration and get hit with another points deduction. They don't seem to get the point the EFL penalties are based on precedent, apart from the world first for HMRC late payment.
You support Reading not Utd or Chelsea ffs.
You really like broadcast what an awful person you are, don't you.Royal_jimmy wrote:Why are you such a left wing fan who touches kids?Snowflake Royal wrote:Why are you always such an awful pcunt of an arrogant fan?Royal_jimmy wrote:
They're just a jealous tinpot club who are ignorant to the reality of our situation. When they don't realise that the EFL have their fair share of blame to accept for the mess we're in by allowing Dai to buy us despite all the red flags.
You support Reading not Utd or Chelsea ffs.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers, royals6719 and 1425 guests