The problem is as a journalist in this sort of situation, he shouldn't be taking the clubs word for it without referencing that the club or the person has told him XYZ. Its been clear for so long that certain people in the club haven't been 100% factual.From Despair To Where? wrote:There was an interview that Couhig did with a podcast where he specifically said that Dellor was just repeating whatever the club fed him.
Call me crazy but Couhig really needs to scrap a lot of people in a lot of different areas tbh. We need a fresh start in more ways than one.Reading4eva wrote:The problem is as a journalist in this sort of situation, he shouldn't be taking the clubs word for it without referencing that the club or the person has told him XYZ. Its been clear for so long that certain people in the club haven't been 100% factual.From Despair To Where? wrote:There was an interview that Couhig did with a podcast where he specifically said that Dellor was just repeating whatever the club fed him.
Dellor is the BBC Berks sports editor I believe, it’s up to him to source and investigate the sporting news stories in the region either himself or by appointing others to do it.From Despair To Where? wrote:There was an interview that Couhig did with a podcast where he specifically said that Dellor was just repeating whatever the club fed him.
Unless he holds a grudge or thinks independent journalism is important.Orion1871 wrote:So now he's owner Couhig shouldn't have a problem with someone who will supposedly just "parrots" the line of the club.
Investigative journalism is a specific subset of journalism, not all journalism is investigative. Some is to try to investigate the truth and some is to report what's said/known.Brogue wrote:I don’t see why the sports desk should be any different to the rest of the bbc.
Thames water CEO - yeah we don’t pump sewage into water ways -
BBC - ok the ceo has said they don’t pump sewage into water ways so that must be true.
Now the bbc wouldn’t have taken the ceo on theirr word and would have done their own research.
Why should the sports desk not do the same investigative journalism and actually find out what they are being told is true or not.
That's certainly how my ears received what he said.Snowflake Royal wrote:That's not a contradiction, it's an acknowledgement there's more than one approach to bringing through young players....Greatwesternline wrote:Couhig contradicted himself when he said he wants to keep cat 1 but also said Brentford and Wycombe can bring good young players into their first team squad without an academy.
I wonder which opinion he actually holds.
.
The way I see it, all Dellor, or anyone had to do is ask Couhig for comment and declare that they have extended the right to reply. That at least creates the idea that there are 2 sides to the story.Reading4eva wrote:I love asking the tough questions myself and finding out more about something I've discovered. I'm not a journalist but thats what I expect a journalist to do - be that someone reporting from a warzone or someone reporting on Reading FC. And Dellor just didn't do that with the old ownership. He just fed their soundbites as if they were fact to a fanbase who were already panicking.
As said, I posed the question when he said on the Friday about the Escrow account and 12 million if he was sure it was correct with the knowledge I'd spoke with Rob the evening before. Mainly so Tim could turn around and correct his mistake. Don't get me wrong I don't think Tim has made this up off the top of his head, but Tim has most definitely fed the line back to the fans as if it was fact.
I did try and get Nigel Howe to come on for a video. He ignored the email. I wonder why?
Not saying this is the case in this situation but its easy to feed soundbites that a journalist then repeats on the radio or puts into press which then they become liable for. If someone is on a video, saying something which is rubbish, its far harder to avoid legal action.
It wouldn't surprise me if we see more deals such as the Savage/Elliott deals whereby we go to a Chelsea/Arsenal/Liverpool type of club and say, we'll take player X off your hands for nothing now on a 3 or 4 year deal. He'll be in or near to the first team immediately and if we sell him at any point during his time with us, you get 50 or 60% of any fee (less any agreed training costs etc).Royal Rother wrote:That's certainly how my ears received what he said.Snowflake Royal wrote:That's not a contradiction, it's an acknowledgement there's more than one approach to bringing through young players....Greatwesternline wrote:Couhig contradicted himself when he said he wants to keep cat 1 but also said Brentford and Wycombe can bring good young players into their first team squad without an academy.
I wonder which opinion he actually holds.
.
Not sure this is entirely accurate but my recollection is that he effectively said there are plenty of good young players cast off by other clubs and there is some good value to be had out there. Buy for £300k, sell for a couple of million (as he said they did at Wycombe) and it would be silly not to be on the look out for those as well as what is coming through the Academy, as they may well be more ready for 1st Team football.
I agree but I think without the embargo restrictions we'll definitely look to negotiate deals that lower the sell-on %.Stranded wrote:It wouldn't surprise me if we see more deals such as the Savage/Elliott deals whereby we go to a Chelsea/Arsenal/Liverpool type of club and say, we'll take player X off your hands for nothing now on a 3 or 4 year deal. He'll be in or near to the first team immediately and if we sell him at any point during his time with us, you get 50 or 60% of any fee (less any agreed training costs etc).Royal Rother wrote:That's certainly how my ears received what he said.Snowflake Royal wrote: That's not a contradiction, it's an acknowledgement there's more than one approach to bringing through young players....
Not sure this is entirely accurate but my recollection is that he effectively said there are plenty of good young players cast off by other clubs and there is some good value to be had out there. Buy for £300k, sell for a couple of million (as he said they did at Wycombe) and it would be silly not to be on the look out for those as well as what is coming through the Academy, as they may well be more ready for 1st Team football.
May block some players coming out of our Academy but if the player we bring in is better at the same age, it would make sense.
Potentially but I don't think the embargo makes much difference there - it is about selling it as a risk/reward to the selling club. If they think a player may develop into a top player but not one they will use over the course of the contract then if they can be persuaded to release his registration for nothing, they will want to see a high potential reward.tidus_mi2 wrote:I agree but I think without the embargo restrictions we'll definitely look to negotiate deals that lower the sell-on %.Stranded wrote:It wouldn't surprise me if we see more deals such as the Savage/Elliott deals whereby we go to a Chelsea/Arsenal/Liverpool type of club and say, we'll take player X off your hands for nothing now on a 3 or 4 year deal. He'll be in or near to the first team immediately and if we sell him at any point during his time with us, you get 50 or 60% of any fee (less any agreed training costs etc).Royal Rother wrote:
That's certainly how my ears received what he said.
Not sure this is entirely accurate but my recollection is that he effectively said there are plenty of good young players cast off by other clubs and there is some good value to be had out there. Buy for £300k, sell for a couple of million (as he said they did at Wycombe) and it would be silly not to be on the look out for those as well as what is coming through the Academy, as they may well be more ready for 1st Team football.
May block some players coming out of our Academy but if the player we bring in is better at the same age, it would make sense.
In that case it felt vey much like it, at the very least, helped Rodgers out of the door, even if he was going that way anyway.East Grinstead Royal wrote:Would it be fair to say that Dellor’s fall-out with Brendan Rodgers is the reason he is somewhat less confrontational than we might hope? I can’t imagine that didn’t have some consequences.
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], RG30 and 178 guests