CONFIMRED - Tiago Ilori

[genome]

Not sure why i said Derby lol

I meant Fulham

It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing

He got injured during the Norwich game so wasn't risked in the starting XI.

I'll give you another

[TBM]

Not sure why i said Derby lol

I meant Fulham

It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing

He got injured during the Norwich game so wasn't risked in the starting XI.

I'll give you another

He was still dropped though

The fact he came on before half time - means he wasn't injured....

So i'll give you that back

[Pepe the Horseman]

Not sure why i said Derby lol

I meant Fulham

It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing

He got injured during the Norwich game so wasn't risked in the starting XI.

I'll give you another

He was still dropped though

The fact he came on before half time - means he wasn't injured....

So i'll give you that back

And then they kiss?

[TBM]

@genome

[genome]

No, it means he wasn't risked, not dropped for tactical reasons.

TBM on the offensive because he know's he had a shocker.

[TBM]

No, it means he wasn't risked, not dropped for tactical reasons.

TBM on the offensive because he know's he had a shocker.

Who said anything about it being for tactical reasons. He was dropped from the starting XI - be it through "injury" or whatever, he was still dropped as he started the previous game but not this one

[genome]

Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon

Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.

[TBM]

Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon

Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.

He did against Derby

[genome]

Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon

Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.

He did against Derby

No he didn't, he played the 90 minutes.

[Sutekh]

Surely Ilori would be part of a back 3 and we'd adopt the wing back approach more consistently. Thus all 3 will play and Evans/Berg will lose out.

[TBM]

Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon

Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.

He did against Derby

No he didn't, he played the 90 minutes.

Thought you said he was injured

[genome]

For the Fulham match.

Keep up TBM

[MouldyRoyal]

He dropped him against Derby

He played the 90 minutes

Not sure why i said Derby lol

I meant Fulham

It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing

[leon]

Never mind all the flirting, is it confrimed yet?

[TBM]

For the Fulham match.

Keep up TBM

At least now you admit he was dropped for it

[genome]

For the Fulham match.

Keep up TBM

At least now you admit he was dropped for it

Because of injury.

This is the worst deb8 in HNA history

[Pepe the Horseman]

[paultheroyal]

Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon

Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.

Does being club captain immune you from being dropped? Must be a clause thing.

[Ian Royal]

I hope this outlay is because of the new ownership, because the club really are not in a position to be spending £2-£3m on a new player, if everything I have heard & read is to be believed.

If this isn't from the chinese its just more debt for the club.

If it's from the chinese it's still debt to the club. Just owed to them rather than the Thais or some third party.

[Nameless]

I hope this outlay is because of the new ownership, because the club really are not in a position to be spending £2-£3m on a new player, if everything I have heard & read is to be believed.

If this isn't from the chinese its just more debt for the club.

If it's from the chinese it's still debt to the club. Just owed to them rather than the Thais or some third party.

Not necessarily. They could chose to loan the money, or not. Not all the money SJM put into the club was loaned.