West Stand Man There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy.
No, there wasn't, you fool.

by SpaceCruiser » 19 Dec 2006 10:23
West Stand Man There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy.
by rg6royal » 19 Dec 2006 10:36
by handbags_harris » 19 Dec 2006 10:38
by Don Finch » 19 Dec 2006 10:42
by bcubed » 19 Dec 2006 13:12
West Stand ManYupRhys The RoyalWest Stand Manbcubed seems like you are on your own here WS Man
Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
And youve seen the reverse angle?
by West Stand Man » 19 Dec 2006 14:21
by Rhys The Royal » 21 Dec 2006 09:56
West Stand ManYupRhys The RoyalWest Stand Manbcubed seems like you are on your own here WS Man
Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
And youve seen the reverse angle?
by rg6royal » 21 Dec 2006 10:02
by Millsy » 21 Dec 2006 10:20
by brendywendy » 21 Dec 2006 10:28
West Stand Man At last bcubed, you are coming along woth me and accepting the facts? It is painfully clear that there was some contact, whether it was enough to cause the dramatic collapse that resulted is arguable - but as you say - the facts are there and if you wish to continue your Blackadder-like pigheadedness that is fine by me.
Remember - my superiority is totally based on being superior.
by Millsy » 21 Dec 2006 10:30
brendywendyWest Stand Man At last bcubed, you are coming along woth me and accepting the facts? It is painfully clear that there was some contact, whether it was enough to cause the dramatic collapse that resulted is arguable - but as you say - the facts are there and if you wish to continue your Blackadder-like pigheadedness that is fine by me.
Remember - my superiority is totally based on being superior.
but the contact was about 5 seconds before the dive and clearly not enough to even nudge mcarthy, and when he did dive he was a yard away from sonko.
as a defender, if i touch the bloke at half time, and at the end of the match he dives, surely it doesnt count
by West Stand Man » 21 Dec 2006 10:39
by brendywendy » 21 Dec 2006 10:40
West Stand Man I think we are all agreed there then. Contact yes, penalty no. We can argue to the death over the fall or the dive (and I challenge you to try it - you do often get a delayed reaction to an slight ankle tap).
I think we are all agreed that the fall was exagerated.
Spaecruiser and bcubed seem out on a limb claiming no contact at all - but that fits the usual quality of their observational powers. My daughter is still on hand to offer appointments at D&A if required.
by brendywendy » 21 Dec 2006 10:41
by West Stand Man » 21 Dec 2006 11:27
brendywendyWest Stand Man - you do often get a delayed reaction to an slight ankle tap).
quote]
honestly
shut up
are you blind
by Tinrib » 21 Dec 2006 11:51
by brendywendy » 21 Dec 2006 12:12
West Stand ManbrendywendyWest Stand Man - you do often get a delayed reaction to an slight ankle tap).
quote]
honestly
shut up
are you blind
You have obviously never played any contact sport or you'd understand what I am saying.
ps, actually I have outstanding eyesight . It is superior - of course.
by brendywendy » 21 Dec 2006 12:17
brendywendyWest Stand ManbrendywendyWest Stand Man - you do often get a delayed reaction to an slight ankle tap).
quote]
honestly
shut up
are you blind
You have obviously never played any contact sport or you'd understand what I am saying.
ps, actually I have outstanding eyesight . It is superior - of course.
i play and have played many contact sports, and i understand you whitterings quite well, they are just wrong.
and i have never seen or heard of a huge and spontaneaous lateral movement of the leg as a result of, and 5 seconds after being brushed by someones clothing.
you may well have outstanding eyesight, but you are talking rubbish
please shh
by Man Friday » 21 Dec 2006 12:24
by Man Friday » 21 Dec 2006 12:35
Users browsing this forum: West F and 321 guests