Ron would not have been impressed

10 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24451
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Ron would not have been impressed

by Sutekh » 05 Feb 2026 14:08


User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26772
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by From Despair To Where? » 05 Feb 2026 14:38

"included reference – whether express or implied – to sexual orientation".

I accept that the standard of refereeing in League 1 is shit but saying the ref sucked dick to get to this level is not something I want to hear an employee of the club saying. It was also reported by our head steward so clearly he thought it was out of order as well.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25955
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Feb 2026 15:18

Go on then :roll: ….Richard ‘Dick’ Bone

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9843
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by Forbury Lion » 05 Feb 2026 15:49

Does this mean we need to sign an assistant kit man on loan as cover for 6 games or will someone have to "play" out of position?

I wonder what he said, if he said the referee was bent that could have meant corrupt, although he admitted the charge so either he said something else or calling the referee corrupt would have been a more serious charge

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3975
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by Clyde1998 » 05 Feb 2026 16:37

Forbury Lion Does this mean we need to sign an assistant kit man on loan as cover for 6 games or will someone have to "play" out of position?

I wonder what he said, if he said the referee was bent that could have meant corrupt, although he admitted the charge so either he said something else or calling the referee corrupt would have been a more serious charge



User avatar
morganb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3316
Joined: 31 Jul 2017 12:30

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by morganb » 05 Feb 2026 16:39

Forbury Lion Does this mean we need to sign an assistant kit man on loan as cover for 6 games or will someone have to "play" out of position?

I wonder what he said, if he said the referee was bent that could have meant corrupt, although he admitted the charge so either he said something else or calling the referee corrupt would have been a more serious charge


What he said is in the PDF attached to the article - link to PDF:

https://www.thefa.com/-/media/files/the ... -bone.ashx

It doesn't get removed by the site profanity checker so -

“he should be in the National League. He has sucked duck to get to this level"

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 48729
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by Snowflake Royal » 05 Feb 2026 17:43

Sounds like an appropriate punishment. I hope the club takes it seriously

User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26772
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by From Despair To Where? » 05 Feb 2026 18:36

Snowflake Royal Sounds like an appropriate punishment. I hope the club takes it seriously


It happened in August and and it appears the club had an internal enquiry because the head safety steward reported it.

This is FA enquiry is because it wasentioned in the referee's report.

Double C
Member
Posts: 976
Joined: 01 Apr 2025 11:55

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by Double C » 05 Feb 2026 19:42

The world has gone oxf*rd mad

Can't even tell people they suck dicks anymore, Snowflake woke society run by the gen z they/thems :? :| :roll:


Double C
Member
Posts: 976
Joined: 01 Apr 2025 11:55

Re: Ron would not have been impressed

by Double C » 05 Feb 2026 19:42

Wait forgot to login as my Millsy username, sorry

10 posts   •   Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 462 guests

It is currently 05 Feb 2026 19:52