
by Bath Hoops » 01 Sep 2009 12:18
by YateleyRoyal » 01 Sep 2009 12:22
Bath Hoops Heidar Helguson is available and apparently Watford are favourites to land him, good experience player who would add some quality up front. Would certainly be worth a punt especially if it meant Watford didnt get him
by Bath Hoops » 01 Sep 2009 12:28
Whats incorrect ? Its reported that he is available and Watford are currently favourites to sign him , you can check on Sky and they are usually pretty good with their rumours.YateleyRoyalBath Hoops Heidar Helguson is available and apparently Watford are favourites to land him, good experience player who would add some quality up front. Would certainly be worth a punt especially if it meant Watford didnt get him
Incorrect.
by rg6royal » 01 Sep 2009 12:29
by Wycombe Royal » 01 Sep 2009 12:30
Bath HoopsWhats incorrect ? Its reported that he is available and Watford are currently favourites to sign him , you can check on Sky and they are usually pretty good with their rumours.YateleyRoyalBath Hoops Heidar Helguson is available and apparently Watford are favourites to land him, good experience player who would add some quality up front. Would certainly be worth a punt especially if it meant Watford didnt get him
Incorrect.
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2009 12:30
by YateleyRoyal » 01 Sep 2009 12:31
Bath HoopsWhats incorrect ? Its reported that he is available and Watford are currently favourites to sign him , you can check on Sky and they are usually pretty good with their rumours.YateleyRoyalBath Hoops Heidar Helguson is available and apparently Watford are favourites to land him, good experience player who would add some quality up front. Would certainly be worth a punt especially if it meant Watford didnt get him
Incorrect.
by Bath Hoops » 01 Sep 2009 12:39
by winchester_royal » 01 Sep 2009 12:40
Bath Hoops Sorry have to disagree he is a good quality player and has shown that in the past, certainly playing in the championship his scoring record was good and I would think his style of play would fit into our new style better than Rasiak.
by Bath Hoops » 01 Sep 2009 12:45
I'm wouldn't agree with you on that, I'd say he was just as good a ball player and more able to play as a lone striker in the mould that Brendan has set out. Certainly has a better turn of pace than Rasiak and a decent goalscoring record in the championship and premiership.winchester_royalBath Hoops Sorry have to disagree he is a good quality player and has shown that in the past, certainly playing in the championship his scoring record was good and I would think his style of play would fit into our new style better than Rasiak.
How?
Rasiak is far superior to Helguson in terms of technique with ball at feet. Helguson is good in the air and not much else.
by YateleyRoyal » 01 Sep 2009 12:46
Bath Hoops Sorry have to disagree he is a good quality player and has shown that in the past, certainly playing in the championship his scoring record was good and I would think his style of play would fit into our new style better than Rasiak.
by Row Z Royal » 01 Sep 2009 13:30
by Hoop Blah » 01 Sep 2009 13:33
Bath HoopsI'm wouldn't agree with you on that, I'd say he was just as good a ball player and more able to play as a lone striker in the mould that Brendan has set out. Certainly has a better turn of pace than Rasiak and a decent goalscoring record in the championship and premiership.winchester_royalBath Hoops Sorry have to disagree he is a good quality player and has shown that in the past, certainly playing in the championship his scoring record was good and I would think his style of play would fit into our new style better than Rasiak.
How?
Rasiak is far superior to Helguson in terms of technique with ball at feet. Helguson is good in the air and not much else.
by Geekins » 01 Sep 2009 13:49
Row Z Royal There are few worse strikers in the CCC than Helguson.
/thread
by Royalwaster » 01 Sep 2009 13:53
GeekinsRow Z Royal There are few worse strikers in the CCC than Helguson.
/thread
Long, Church and Rasiak??
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 198 guests