If these rivals want him, demand the full money up front.
It's how it should be anyway.

by ZacNaloen » 03 Aug 2011 13:01
by Svlad Cjelli » 03 Aug 2011 13:04
by Wycombe Royal » 03 Aug 2011 13:06
Svlad Cjelli But (currently) the Football Creditors Rule means we'll get 100% of the money no matter what happens.
by Svlad Cjelli » 03 Aug 2011 13:07
Wycombe RoyalSvlad Cjelli But (currently) the Football Creditors Rule means we'll get 100% of the money no matter what happens.
So when/if the rules are changed, would all deals done before the change still be covered by the football creditors rule?
by Rob-Royal » 03 Aug 2011 13:37
by Barry the bird boggler » 03 Aug 2011 13:48
by Rob-Royal » 03 Aug 2011 13:49
Rob-Royal Take this with a lump of salt of course - but interested to hear BMc mentioning hero's welcome on Sat....
http://www.millwall.vitalfootball.co.uk ... 17&posts=7
by Hoop Blah » 03 Aug 2011 13:53
Svlad Cjelli But (currently) the Football Creditors Rule means we'll get 100% of the money no matter what happens.
by loyalroyal4life » 03 Aug 2011 14:49
Barry the bird boggler 6m + Cox at the end of August works me (or the same but in January would be even better)!
by Svlad Cjelli » 03 Aug 2011 15:23
Hoop BlahSvlad Cjelli But (currently) the Football Creditors Rule means we'll get 100% of the money no matter what happens.
Not if they go out of business surely?
I know it's an extreme scenario, but if they've actually run out of money and get wound up we're only at the front of the queue for our money, it's not guaranteed as such is it?
by Hoop Blah » 03 Aug 2011 16:24
by Ian Royal » 03 Aug 2011 17:08
Svlad Cjelli Are we "selling players to our rivals" - or are we just unable to stop players leaving when our rivals tempt them with what are ludicrous offers and salaries for this level of the game?
by rhroyal » 03 Aug 2011 17:30
by Friday's Legacy » 03 Aug 2011 17:38
rhroyal http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/football-league/championship/9508/2/exclusive-%E2%80%93-mcdermott-no-bid-leicester-shane-long?
McDermott denies Leceister bid, and maintains that Long should move to a Premiership club.
“We’ve had contact from Leicester very early in the summer but we’ve had no £7.5million email drop on our doorstep,” said McDermott, speaking to Drive Time. “For me, Shane Long belongs in the Premiership."
"If it’s a Championship club and it's Leicester who offer that kind of money then it will be down to the board. My view on Shane Long is he is a Premiership player and I’d sign him for any Premiership team that I was involved with."
Reading between the lines, McD will be royally pissed off if Long is sold to another Championship club. He clearly believes that he should only be sold to a Premiership team, however he does concede that it would be the board's decision if a big offer comes in.
by leicsRoyal » 03 Aug 2011 17:53
by specialjon » 03 Aug 2011 17:57
rhroyal http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/football-league/championship/9508/2/exclusive-%E2%80%93-mcdermott-no-bid-leicester-shane-long?
"If it’s a Championship club and it's Leicester who offer that kind of money then it will be down to the board. My view on Shane Long is he is a Premiership player and I’d sign him for any Premiership team that I was involved with."
by Franchise FC » 03 Aug 2011 18:08
specialjonrhroyal http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/football-league/championship/9508/2/exclusive-%E2%80%93-mcdermott-no-bid-leicester-shane-long?
"If it’s a Championship club and it's Leicester who offer that kind of money then it will be down to the board. My view on Shane Long is he is a Premiership player and I’d sign him for any Premiership team that I was involved with."
So basically he's off in anyone offers what we want for him?
by leww_rfc » 03 Aug 2011 19:56
by savage 4 england » 03 Aug 2011 23:10
by Sarah Star » 03 Aug 2011 23:14