Spot on!handbags_harris wrote:I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
ISort of agree, although he did blast it - I thought Fed's just didn't get the chance to react quick enough. Hell of a tight angle.handbags_harris wrote:I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
I've watched it in slowmo and I don't think Feds could have done too much about it. He tried hard but the pace of the ball beat him.handbags_harris wrote:I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.


Likewise. And although I know the GK Union is very strong and united, other keepers and goalkeeper coaches I have spoken to, also say there was little he could do given the power, pace and rising nature of the shot. It was a great finish and I doubt anyone could have reacted quickly enough to save it. Furthermore, had Feds tried to anticipate a shot of that nature, he would have been rightly criticised had the shot been hit across him, as in most cases it would have been.Royal With Cheese wrote:]ISort of agree, although he did blast it - I thought Fed's just didn't get the chance to react quick enough. Hell of a tight angle.handbags_harris wrote:I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
Batigol - one of my all time favourites...terrific stuffZ175 wrote:I would agree that normally the keeper should not be beaten at his near post. But this is because its freakishly difficult to kick it right in the corner from a tight angle, so normally the keeper has a chance.
However on the occasions where this is done it is impossible to save. Watch the replay, Federici has it covered, sees it, reacts early, jumps and doesn't get it. A fraction left, right, up or down and its a miss or a save, class finish and nothing to be done.
Another good example below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf-od48IfkI
That went straight over Spunky into the far corner. How can that be a good example of what happened on Saturday?Z175 wrote:I would agree that normally the keeper should not be beaten at his near post. But this is because its freakishly difficult to kick it right in the corner from a tight angle, so normally the keeper has a chance.
However on the occasions where this is done it is impossible to save. Watch the replay, Federici has it covered, sees it, reacts early, jumps and doesn't get it. A fraction left, right, up or down and its a miss or a save, class finish and nothing to be done.
Another good example below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf-od48IfkI
Nothing like it! Seamen drops too early and the ball goes right over him. Should've stood up to it.
I am not a Feds fan and don't think he should have regained his place last season, but I agreeBenReadingFC wrote:I've watched it in slowmo and I don't think Feds could have done too much about it. He tried hard but the pace of the ball beat him.handbags_harris wrote:I've seen the Coventry goal now, and quite frankly any 'keeper should be embarrassed to concede from that angle inside the near post. It can be considered nothing except absolute p*ss-poor goalkeeping.
It was a brilliant shot right in the near post top corner that carried on rising into the roof of the net at speed. OK he got beat at the near post... but that was an almightily acurate shot to get beaten by.
I can't really faulter Feds positioning either.
Give McSheffrey a clap and move on.
Harsh on Pearce, he makes the angle narrow and puts pressure on the shooter, it literally has to be perfectly placed and powered to go in.floyd__streete wrote:Just watched http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15054276.stm . Federici hardly covers himself in glory with the Cov goal, but witness - AGAIN - how flat-footed Pearce is in lolloping behind McSheffrey meaning that no pressure is put on the man having a pop on goal. Fed also threatens to cost us another goal around the 50 second mark of that clip, managing to palm another shot from a tight angle back into the middle of the 18 yard box, only for Cov to blast over- as usual he makes the straight-forward look difficult. Reading's goal calmly finished by Church.....yes, Church
. Gorkss beaten all ends up for the pen.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 106 guests