Snowball Or start your own stats threads (they will clearly be MUCH better)
and, OBVIOUSLY, people will flock to that "much better" stats thread
LOL. The argument of a 5 year old.
The Snowball stat thread
-
floyd__streete
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 8326
- Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
- Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.
LOL. The argument of a 5 year old.
-
Wycombe Royal
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
- Location: Churchdown, Glos
Snowball Why not have a stats thread which is separate
and another thread for the sensible, deeply-motivated constructive bloke
and other critics/moaners/WUMS to post as much and as often as they like about it?
Just separate the stats themselves
Or start your own stats threads (they will clearly be MUCH better)
and, OBVIOUSLY, people will flock to that "much better" stats thread
and this one will die on the vine
So basically you want your own thread that no one else can post on and that only contains stats? That isn't what a discussion forum is for.
-
floyd__streete
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 8326
- Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
- Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.
Wycombe Royal So basically you want your own thread that no one else can post on and that only contains stats. That isn't what a discussion forum is for.
In a nutshell. LOL @ demanding the terms of engagement on a message board you contribute to. Run your own if you aren't happy. Don't see what all the fuss is about. Develop a sense of humour. And be grateful that other members of the human race wish to debate with you, despite your appalling social skills.
floyd__streeteSnowball Or start your own stats threads (they will clearly be MUCH better)
and, OBVIOUSLY, people will flock to that "much better" stats thread
LOL. The argument of a 5 year old.
Explain, Sir. Why is that a childish argument?
I would say it's a very reasonable adult suggestion.
I believe my stats, even with flaws, are of real interest to the majority here
but the threads are contaminated, sullied by the constant barracking.
Surely, those who dislike my version of statting, can clearly do better?
And surely, if they did, their threads would be well-supported and my "useless" ones not?
Wycombe Royal So basically you want your own thread that no one else can post on and that only contains stats? That isn't what a discussion forum is for.
No. Not at all. The two threads could be pinned right next to each other
One thread has the main, regular stats, the adjacent thread discusses them.
Just like right now There's the Tilehurst End (separate blog) and discussion here OF that blog
The difference would be that those trying to FIND the stats could do so.
Right now they have to wade through a sea of vitriol to find any stats
-
floyd__streete
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 8326
- Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
- Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.
Snowball Explain, Sir. Why is that a childish argument?
I would say it's a very reasonable adult suggestion.
I believe my stats, even with flaws, are of real interest to the majority here
but the threads are contaminated, sullied by the constant barracking.
Surely, those who dislike my version of statting, can clearly do better?
And surely, if they did, their threads would be well-supported and my "useless" ones not?
You take yourself far too seriously, you sensitive old fool.
Would you like a cuddle? PM me your seat number, I'll come over tongiht and hug you. What time do you knock off later? Fancy a pint.....no, neither do I.
floyd__streeteWycombe Royal So basically you want your own thread that no one else can post on and that only contains stats. That isn't what a discussion forum is for.
In a nutshell. LOL @ demanding the terms of engagement on a message board you contribute to. Run your own if you aren't happy. Don't see what all the fuss is about. Develop a sense of humour. And be grateful that other members of the human race wish to debate with you, despite your appalling social skills.
Ignoring yet another insult. No, the reason is that the too-regular arguments
make the stats thread unmanageable. By all means argue just as much or ten
times as much "next door" but allow those who would actually like to READ
the stats (without contamination) the opportunity to do so.
Unless, of course the plan is to screw up the stats thread in order to kill it?
-
T.R.O.L.I.
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 6526
- Joined: 17 Mar 2005 14:47
- Location: 2 down, far right - Still recovering from the weekend's excesses
cmonurzSnowballTerminal Boardom This is either for Strap or Snowball.
What with 6 wins on the spin, what have been the best winning runs in the second tier and what was the final league position? I think the best we had was 10 in 2005/06 and we all know what happened then.
Strap
But cmonurz says we had 13 not too long ago
Cmonurz is right.
One for strap to confirm as Snowball is a relative newbie to RFC, but Reading’s 13 wins in a row to start the 85/86 (?) season is a football league record. I don’t know if we’ve beaten it with another run mid-season, but I’d doubt it, we’re Reading, not Barca.
Cmonurz is not right.
As has already been pointed out, 13 wins in a row was acheived in the 3rd tier. The OP refers to "best winning runs in the second tier".
floyd__streete
Would you like a cuddle?
You are really, really funny, Floyd.
Bringing it back to Football
It's impossible to call
MS, think like this. Let's say, for simplicity that RFC, Saints, WHU
roughly match each other's ppg for the next six (WHU+RFC) and five (Saints) games
(say at 2 ppg)... and we'll "give" WHU and RFC a win in their Game in Hand
1 39 +33 77 West Ham
2 39 +40 75 Southampton
3 39 +27 73 Reading
So, if WHU and Saints manage 2 ppg (quite possible, altho' not probable that both will)
We go into the WHU game (7 games to go) virtually "having to win" and even if we did
win, say, 2-0 and Saints won that same day?
1 40 +42 78 Southampton
2 40 +31 77 West Ham
3 40 +29 76 Reading
If we LOST at WHU, all the other averages as given, we'd be 7 points behind with six to play
virtually impossible to make up.
1 40 +35 80 West Ham
2 40 +42 78 Southampton
3 40 +25 73 Reading
That is, of course, presuming we WIN at Doncaster!!
So no bones about it, we have to win at Doncaster and we have to gain points on WHU and Saints
in the next (other) 5 games. It's a very, VERY tall order. They have room to slip up. We do not.
The most sensible "bet" now is that we will finish 3rd, clear of the pack and be "favourites"
to win the POs (which are really a lottery)
Of course we COULD win at West Ham, Saints, Brighton, Birmingham but that would be miraculous.
Therefore, IMO, we have to win our next six games, up to 12 straight wins to have a shot
I think the table would be roughly (but we could get luckier and the others don't manage 2 ppg)
3 39 +33 78 Reading
1 39 +33 77 West Ham
2 39 +40 75 Southampton
IMO, even if we win 5 and draw 1 of the next six, it will be very tough unless we can win
at either Saints or West Ham. I'd rather go to those grounds thinking a draw is enough
It's impossible to call
MS, think like this. Let's say, for simplicity that RFC, Saints, WHU
roughly match each other's ppg for the next six (WHU+RFC) and five (Saints) games
(say at 2 ppg)... and we'll "give" WHU and RFC a win in their Game in Hand
1 39 +33 77 West Ham
2 39 +40 75 Southampton
3 39 +27 73 Reading
So, if WHU and Saints manage 2 ppg (quite possible, altho' not probable that both will)
We go into the WHU game (7 games to go) virtually "having to win" and even if we did
win, say, 2-0 and Saints won that same day?
1 40 +42 78 Southampton
2 40 +31 77 West Ham
3 40 +29 76 Reading
If we LOST at WHU, all the other averages as given, we'd be 7 points behind with six to play
virtually impossible to make up.
1 40 +35 80 West Ham
2 40 +42 78 Southampton
3 40 +25 73 Reading
That is, of course, presuming we WIN at Doncaster!!
So no bones about it, we have to win at Doncaster and we have to gain points on WHU and Saints
in the next (other) 5 games. It's a very, VERY tall order. They have room to slip up. We do not.
The most sensible "bet" now is that we will finish 3rd, clear of the pack and be "favourites"
to win the POs (which are really a lottery)
Of course we COULD win at West Ham, Saints, Brighton, Birmingham but that would be miraculous.
Therefore, IMO, we have to win our next six games, up to 12 straight wins to have a shot
I think the table would be roughly (but we could get luckier and the others don't manage 2 ppg)
3 39 +33 78 Reading
1 39 +33 77 West Ham
2 39 +40 75 Southampton
IMO, even if we win 5 and draw 1 of the next six, it will be very tough unless we can win
at either Saints or West Ham. I'd rather go to those grounds thinking a draw is enough
Bringing it Back to Football
After Millwall (CORRECTED)
Roberts Pairings
466 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt 5 Goals, 4 Major Contibutions
025 Minutes - Roberts-Le F. 1 Goals, 1 Major Contributions
023 Minutes - Roberts-Chch 0 Goals, 0 Assists
Major Contributions are awarded for straightforward conventional assists
for a pass resulting in another player winning a penalty,
for winning a penalty whether scored or not
for forcing an own goal
and for any other major contribution such
6 Games, 6 Goals 5 Assists for Roberts Partnerships
078 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 1-0 Roberts (1) Hunt (0) Bristol Hunt Assist, brilliant flick to Roberts , Roberts Assist (Winning Pen)
067 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 2-0 Roberts (1) Hunt (0) Coventry Roberts Assist (back heel for Kebe Goal)
023 Minutes - Roberts-Chch W 2-0 Roberts (0) Chch (0) Coventry
090 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 1-0 Roberts (0) Hunt (1) Derby
076 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 1-0 Roberts (1) Hunt (0) Burnley
090 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 2-0 Roberts (0) Hunt (1) Middlesboro Roberts Assist (Won FK Harte Scored)
065 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 2-1 Roberts (0) Hunt (0) Millwall
025 Minutes - Roberts-Le F. W 2-1 Roberts (0) Le F. (1) Millwall Roberts Assist for Le Fondre winning goal
514 Minutes - Roberts-Other W6 9-1
Goals:
3 Roberts
2 Hunt
1 Le Fondre
Assists:
4 Roberts
1 Hunt
Genuinely grateful thanks to Maguire for his calculator
After Millwall (CORRECTED)
Roberts Pairings
466 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt 5 Goals, 4 Major Contibutions
025 Minutes - Roberts-Le F. 1 Goals, 1 Major Contributions
023 Minutes - Roberts-Chch 0 Goals, 0 Assists
Major Contributions are awarded for straightforward conventional assists
for a pass resulting in another player winning a penalty,
for winning a penalty whether scored or not
for forcing an own goal
and for any other major contribution such
6 Games, 6 Goals 5 Assists for Roberts Partnerships
078 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 1-0 Roberts (1) Hunt (0) Bristol Hunt Assist, brilliant flick to Roberts , Roberts Assist (Winning Pen)
067 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 2-0 Roberts (1) Hunt (0) Coventry Roberts Assist (back heel for Kebe Goal)
023 Minutes - Roberts-Chch W 2-0 Roberts (0) Chch (0) Coventry
090 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 1-0 Roberts (0) Hunt (1) Derby
076 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 1-0 Roberts (1) Hunt (0) Burnley
090 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 2-0 Roberts (0) Hunt (1) Middlesboro Roberts Assist (Won FK Harte Scored)
065 Minutes - Roberts-Hunt W 2-1 Roberts (0) Hunt (0) Millwall
025 Minutes - Roberts-Le F. W 2-1 Roberts (0) Le F. (1) Millwall Roberts Assist for Le Fondre winning goal
514 Minutes - Roberts-Other W6 9-1
Goals:
3 Roberts
2 Hunt
1 Le Fondre
Assists:
4 Roberts
1 Hunt
Genuinely grateful thanks to Maguire for his calculator
Bringing it Back to Football
Southampton were VERY lucky at Leeds.
You can't give away chances like that every game without, some day, getting a 3-0 thumping
But they have by FAR the easiest run-in and will probably be champions
We have to hope they slip up somewhere (maybe tonight versus Ipswich?)
H Ipswich Very good chance of a win, tho' Ipswich improving 5 wins out of 6
H Barnsley Good chance of another win
A Millwall Very good chance of an away win
A Hull City Possible loss, but once Hull think the POs are too far off?
H Doncaster Should be 4-0 win
A Blackpool Blackpool are Jekyll & Hyde but Saints could lose here
H Portsmouth Should be a big win, but it is a derby Match, so...
A Crystal Palace Tough to win there, could lose
H Reading I think (ATM) that Saints will win this
A Peterborough Toughie but Saints could win
A Middlesbrough No win guaranteed at Boro
H Coventry Big win, but Coventry may need a result to stay up
Southampton were VERY lucky at Leeds.
You can't give away chances like that every game without, some day, getting a 3-0 thumping
But they have by FAR the easiest run-in and will probably be champions
We have to hope they slip up somewhere (maybe tonight versus Ipswich?)
H Ipswich Very good chance of a win, tho' Ipswich improving 5 wins out of 6
H Barnsley Good chance of another win
A Millwall Very good chance of an away win
A Hull City Possible loss, but once Hull think the POs are too far off?
H Doncaster Should be 4-0 win
A Blackpool Blackpool are Jekyll & Hyde but Saints could lose here
H Portsmouth Should be a big win, but it is a derby Match, so...
A Crystal Palace Tough to win there, could lose
H Reading I think (ATM) that Saints will win this
A Peterborough Toughie but Saints could win
A Middlesbrough No win guaranteed at Boro
H Coventry Big win, but Coventry may need a result to stay up
-
floyd__streete
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 8326
- Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
- Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.
Snowball A Middlesbrough No win guaranteed at Boro
Where can you guarantee me a win? I need tips for my accy.
Bringing it Back to Football
Table Since September 17th (Doncaster)
17 Most Wins
05 Least Defeats
56 Most Points
14 Most Clean Sheets
05 Equal Least Failed to Score
01 Games in Hand and Four Clubs
2.07 Highest Points Per Game
1.90 Second Best Goal Average. Saints 1.96, RFC 1.90, Birmingham 1.8,
1 27 17-5-05 . . . 14 Clean Sheets - 05 FTS - 38-20 +18 56 POINTS - 2.07 Reading
2 27 15-6-06 . . . 12 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 38-25 +13 51 POINTS - 1.89 West Ham United
3 28 14-8-06 . . . 11 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 47-24 +23 50 POINTS - 1.79 Southampton
4 28 13-9-06 . . . 10 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 45-25 +20 48 POINTS - 1.71 Birmingham City
5 26 12-7-07 . . . 12 Clean Sheets - 08 FTS - 28-20 +08 43 POINTS - 1.65 Hull City
6 28 12-9-07 . . . 06 Clean Sheets - 05 FTS - 49-39 +10 45 POINTS - 1.61 Blackpool
7 27 11-9-07 . . . 08 Clean Sheets - 05 FTS - 41-35 +06 42 POINTS - 1.56 Cardiff City
8 27 11-9-07 . . . 10 Clean Sheets - 10 FTS - 29-30 -01 42 POINTS - 1.56 Middlesbrough
9 28 12-6-10 . . . 07 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 41-38 +03 42 POINTS - 1.50 Leeds United[/quote]
Table Since September 17th (Doncaster)
17 Most Wins
05 Least Defeats
56 Most Points
14 Most Clean Sheets
05 Equal Least Failed to Score
01 Games in Hand and Four Clubs
2.07 Highest Points Per Game
1.90 Second Best Goal Average. Saints 1.96, RFC 1.90, Birmingham 1.8,
1 27 17-5-05 . . . 14 Clean Sheets - 05 FTS - 38-20 +18 56 POINTS - 2.07 Reading
2 27 15-6-06 . . . 12 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 38-25 +13 51 POINTS - 1.89 West Ham United
3 28 14-8-06 . . . 11 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 47-24 +23 50 POINTS - 1.79 Southampton
4 28 13-9-06 . . . 10 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 45-25 +20 48 POINTS - 1.71 Birmingham City
5 26 12-7-07 . . . 12 Clean Sheets - 08 FTS - 28-20 +08 43 POINTS - 1.65 Hull City
6 28 12-9-07 . . . 06 Clean Sheets - 05 FTS - 49-39 +10 45 POINTS - 1.61 Blackpool
7 27 11-9-07 . . . 08 Clean Sheets - 05 FTS - 41-35 +06 42 POINTS - 1.56 Cardiff City
8 27 11-9-07 . . . 10 Clean Sheets - 10 FTS - 29-30 -01 42 POINTS - 1.56 Middlesbrough
9 28 12-6-10 . . . 07 Clean Sheets - 06 FTS - 41-38 +03 42 POINTS - 1.50 Leeds United[/quote]
Bringing it Back to Football
Remember that the record-Breaking Reading side averaged 2.265 ppg over the whole season
We have been steadily improving throughout this run since Doncaster
Take a look at the average points achieved every 14 games (1-14, 2-15 etc)
Games-ppg
01-14 1.29 ppg - - 059 Point Season - - Mid Table
02-15 1.21 ppg - - 056 Point Season - - Low Mid Table
03-16 1.21 ppg - - 052 Point Season - - Low Mid Table
04-17 1.21 ppg - - 061 Point Season - - Low Mid Table
05-18 1.43 ppg - - 066 Point Season - - High Mid-Table
06-19 1.64 ppg - - 076 Point Season - - Play Off Position
07-20 1.64 ppg - - 080 Point Season - - Play Off Position From Doncaster Home Game Onwards
08-21 1.64 ppg - - 080 Point Season - - Play Off Position
09-22 1.79 ppg - - 082 Point Season - - 2nd/3rd
10-23 1.79 ppg - - 082 Point Season - - 2nd/3rd
11-24 1.93 ppg - - 089 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
12-25 1.71 ppg - - 079 Point Season - - High Play-Offs
13-26 1.86 ppg - - 085 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form, Possibly 2nd (This Season)
14-27 1.87 ppg - - 082 Point Season - - 2nd/3rd
15-28 1.93 ppg - - 089 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
16-29 2.14 ppg - - 099 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
17-30 2.14 ppg - - 099 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
18-31 2.36 ppg - - 108 Point Season - - Record-Breaking Form Like 2005-06
19-32 2.36 ppg - - 108 Point Season - - Record-Breaking Form Like 2005-06
20-33 2.40 ppg - - 108 Point Season - - Record-Breaking Form Like 2005-06 (Up to Millwall Away)
What follows is just an illustration only, based on IF we win. Will be adjusted as necessary
21-34 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Portsmouth H (63)
22-35 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Leicester H (66)
23-36 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Doncaster A (69)
24-37 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Barnsley A
25-38 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Peterboro A
26-39 2.79 ppg - - 128 Point Season - - Blackpool H
Remember that the record-Breaking Reading side averaged 2.265 ppg over the whole season
We have been steadily improving throughout this run since Doncaster
Take a look at the average points achieved every 14 games (1-14, 2-15 etc)
Games-ppg
01-14 1.29 ppg - - 059 Point Season - - Mid Table
02-15 1.21 ppg - - 056 Point Season - - Low Mid Table
03-16 1.21 ppg - - 052 Point Season - - Low Mid Table
04-17 1.21 ppg - - 061 Point Season - - Low Mid Table
05-18 1.43 ppg - - 066 Point Season - - High Mid-Table
06-19 1.64 ppg - - 076 Point Season - - Play Off Position
07-20 1.64 ppg - - 080 Point Season - - Play Off Position From Doncaster Home Game Onwards
08-21 1.64 ppg - - 080 Point Season - - Play Off Position
09-22 1.79 ppg - - 082 Point Season - - 2nd/3rd
10-23 1.79 ppg - - 082 Point Season - - 2nd/3rd
11-24 1.93 ppg - - 089 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
12-25 1.71 ppg - - 079 Point Season - - High Play-Offs
13-26 1.86 ppg - - 085 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form, Possibly 2nd (This Season)
14-27 1.87 ppg - - 082 Point Season - - 2nd/3rd
15-28 1.93 ppg - - 089 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
16-29 2.14 ppg - - 099 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
17-30 2.14 ppg - - 099 Point Season - - Championship-Winning Form (This Season)
18-31 2.36 ppg - - 108 Point Season - - Record-Breaking Form Like 2005-06
19-32 2.36 ppg - - 108 Point Season - - Record-Breaking Form Like 2005-06
20-33 2.40 ppg - - 108 Point Season - - Record-Breaking Form Like 2005-06 (Up to Millwall Away)
What follows is just an illustration only, based on IF we win. Will be adjusted as necessary
21-34 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Portsmouth H (63)
22-35 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Leicester H (66)
23-36 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Doncaster A (69)
24-37 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Barnsley A
25-38 2.57 ppg - - 118 Point Season - - Peterboro A
26-39 2.79 ppg - - 128 Point Season - - Blackpool H
01 Floyd...
-
Wycombe Royal
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
- Location: Churchdown, Glos
SnowballWycombe Royal So basically you want your own thread that no one else can post on and that only contains stats? That isn't what a discussion forum is for.
No. Not at all. The two threads could be pinned right next to each other
One thread has the main, regular stats, the adjacent thread discusses them.
Just like right now There's the Tilehurst End (separate blog) and discussion here OF that blog
The difference would be that those trying to FIND the stats could do so.
Right now they have to wade through a sea of vitriol to find any stats
The TIlehurst End is a seperate website/blog which has a topic pinned on the team board (only one topic, not two). So in that case why don't you go and create your own stats website where you can put a load of stats, articles, etc which you can moderate your self and have a topic pinned on the team board (if Graham allows it)that discusses what is on there.
No one is stopping you doing that. What you won't get is two topics on here.
01 Floyd...
01 Wycombe Royal...
01 Wycombe Royal...
Bringing it Back to Football
For Those Who Don't Like My Stats.
Football League
http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/H ... 94,00.html
Statto (Excellent)
http://www.statto.com/football/stats/en ... ampionship
Football365
http://stats.football365.com/dom/ENG/D1/runin.html
Player Stats Reading FC
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/readi ... _1032.html
Soccerbase
http://www.soccerbase.com/tournaments/t ... ?comp_id=2
Soccernet
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/stats/scor ... ip?cc=5739
English Football Info
http://www.englishfootball.info/championship/stats/
SoccerStats
http://www.soccerstats.com/trends.asp?league=england2
For Those Who Don't Like My Stats.
Football League
http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/H ... 94,00.html
Statto (Excellent)
http://www.statto.com/football/stats/en ... ampionship
Football365
http://stats.football365.com/dom/ENG/D1/runin.html
Player Stats Reading FC
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/readi ... _1032.html
Soccerbase
http://www.soccerbase.com/tournaments/t ... ?comp_id=2
Soccernet
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/stats/scor ... ip?cc=5739
English Football Info
http://www.englishfootball.info/championship/stats/
SoccerStats
http://www.soccerstats.com/trends.asp?league=england2
Bringing it Back to Football
(and also trying to bring the stats back together as it's murder finding them)
Penalties
Reading play in the Championship and have done for the last 3.7 Seasons
So let's find a stat that is for that exact period, and, of course, in the Championship
You couldn't argue with that, could you? Later I'll try to find more penalty statistics for 2000-2001 through to 2005/6
Here We Are... (Bringing this towards the thread end for easy updating
ALL Championship Penalties, August 2006 - March 1st 2012 (5.7 Years, 5.7 Seasons)
Pen-Gol-Miss-%
070 054 16 0.77 2011-12
157 138 19 0.88 2010-11
124 103 21 0.83 2009-10
142 113 29 0.80 2008-09
105 097 08 0.92 2007-08
040 035 05 0.88 2006-07
638 540 098 85% OVERALL (5 Seasons plus 33 Games)
568 486 082 86% OVERALL (for the 5 Full Seasons before this one)
2007-08 = 92% Scored
2006-07 = 88% Scored
2010-11 = 88% Scored
2009-10 = 83% Scored
2008-09 = 80% Scored
and this season, so far, 77%, will keep table updated.
(Perhaps a higher percentage of pens go in in the last third of the season?)
Grateful Thanks to Ian Royal for the Data URL
(and also trying to bring the stats back together as it's murder finding them)
Penalties
Reading play in the Championship and have done for the last 3.7 Seasons
So let's find a stat that is for that exact period, and, of course, in the Championship
You couldn't argue with that, could you? Later I'll try to find more penalty statistics for 2000-2001 through to 2005/6
Here We Are... (Bringing this towards the thread end for easy updating
ALL Championship Penalties, August 2006 - March 1st 2012 (5.7 Years, 5.7 Seasons)
Pen-Gol-Miss-%
070 054 16 0.77 2011-12
157 138 19 0.88 2010-11
124 103 21 0.83 2009-10
142 113 29 0.80 2008-09
105 097 08 0.92 2007-08
040 035 05 0.88 2006-07
638 540 098 85% OVERALL (5 Seasons plus 33 Games)
568 486 082 86% OVERALL (for the 5 Full Seasons before this one)
2007-08 = 92% Scored
2006-07 = 88% Scored
2010-11 = 88% Scored
2009-10 = 83% Scored
2008-09 = 80% Scored
and this season, so far, 77%, will keep table updated.
(Perhaps a higher percentage of pens go in in the last third of the season?)
Grateful Thanks to Ian Royal for the Data URL
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Linden Jones' Tash, WestYorksRoyal and 155 guests
It is currently 17 Aug 2025 14:57