by Alexander Litvinenko » 07 Oct 2013 15:08
07 Oct 2013 15:08You are George Reynolds AICMFP!Green wrote:Chicken and egg.
"Build it and they will come"
Certainly hard to imagine a world without it.Green wrote:When Reading buses made moves to increase the service frequency of route 17 there were those saying it would be the death of the company.
A couple of decades on and it's the busiest bus corridor in central Berkshire.
Confused. If they're proposing to build on the field I'm thinking of (the one beside the A33 Relief Road), then the Green Park station would be further away from those houses than it is from the Mad Stad. Must be elsewhere.Bandini wrote:Yep, if the cloggies can build houses in what is, essentially, the sea then at the very least we should be able to bang out a Gentle Ben/Everglades knock off. IN! for powering round Kennet Meadows in one of those giant fan powered boats.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 07 Oct 2013 19:48
07 Oct 2013 19:48The whole Kennet Meadows development is for 7,500 houses, so it'll fill most of the floodplain alongside the A33. It was to be built by a number of developers, and the portion of that development to be built by Prudential was down at the Green Park end, and would be served by GP station - to be paid for by Prudential t make their houses more saleable and to overcome transport objections.Deadlock wrote:Confused. If they're proposing to build on the field I'm thinking of (the one beside the A33 Relief Road), then the Green Park station would be further away from those houses than it is from the Mad Stad. Must be elsewhere.Bandini wrote:Yep, if the cloggies can build houses in what is, essentially, the sea then at the very least we should be able to bang out a Gentle Ben/Everglades knock off. IN! for powering round Kennet Meadows in one of those giant fan powered boats.
Did they get the go-ahead to build on the floodplain in the end? That is ludicrous if so. They're just asking for trouble.Alexander Litvinenko wrote:The whole Kennet Meadows development is for 7,500 houses, so it'll fill most of the floodplain alongside the A33. It was to be built by a number of developers, and the portion of that development to be built by Prudential was down at the Green Park end, and would be served by GP station - to be paid for by Prudential t make their houses more saleable and to overcome transport objections.Deadlock wrote:Confused. If they're proposing to build on the field I'm thinking of (the one beside the A33 Relief Road), then the Green Park station would be further away from those houses than it is from the Mad Stad. Must be elsewhere.Bandini wrote:Yep, if the cloggies can build houses in what is, essentially, the sea then at the very least we should be able to bang out a Gentle Ben/Everglades knock off. IN! for powering round Kennet Meadows in one of those giant fan powered boats.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 07 Oct 2013 19:56
07 Oct 2013 19:56
by John Madejski's Wallet » 07 Oct 2013 22:18
07 Oct 2013 22:18
by John Madejski's Wallet » 07 Oct 2013 22:20
07 Oct 2013 22:20
by John Madejski's Wallet » 07 Oct 2013 22:22
07 Oct 2013 22:22If our country was five times the size it is I'd be inclined to agree but not sure you can just condemn a load of land not fit for construction because it's a bit marshy?John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Flood plains are there for a reason and should be left the f#ck alone. I don't care if their 'expert' engineers reckon that raising theale reservoir by 1m will sort it..... the
engineers are ALWAYS wrong when it comes to building on floodplains in this country, as it always goes wrong
by John Madejski's Wallet » 08 Oct 2013 15:15
08 Oct 2013 15:15Something wrong with where all the empty office blocks are?Green wrote:If our country was five times the size it is I'd be inclined to agree but not sure you can just condemn a load of land not fit for construction because it's a bit marshy?John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Flood plains are there for a reason and should be left the f#ck alone. I don't care if their 'expert' engineers reckon that raising theale reservoir by 1m will sort it..... the
engineers are ALWAYS wrong when it comes to building on floodplains in this country, as it always goes wrong
New homes have to go somewhere JMW - where would you put them then? Perhaps you'd like to see some green belt tarmaced over?
by Barry the bird boggler » 08 Oct 2013 17:16
08 Oct 2013 17:16by Barry the bird boggler » 08 Oct 2013 17:30
08 Oct 2013 17:30Not station related- but does anyone know whats going to happen to the old speedway track. Is that going to be housing, offices or just left empty?Alexander Litvinenko wrote:Not really. The extra revenue from the stadium will never be worth enough to make any other investment worthwhile, and I don't think it's transport planners making the decisions. Plus it's a fair old trek to the station, as shown below. ISTR it's reckoned that the only people who'd gain advantage from it are those who'd normally get a stopping train to Basingstoke - everyone else will find it quicker and easier to use the other methods of transport that already exist. That's a pretty small market.Green wrote:Provincial public transport planners in "missing a trick" shock.
And it's Prudential, owners of Green Park, who are paying for the station to be built, so they can sell houses in the residential development at GP.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests